Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

gan6660

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Aug 18, 2008
1,417
0
Cant Wait:
 

Attachments

  • 909700-apple-magic-trackpad.jpg
    909700-apple-magic-trackpad.jpg
    10.7 KB · Views: 53

DylanLikesPorn

macrumors 6502
May 20, 2010
314
1
I have the knock-off version of that, love it. Very versatile for getting sequential astro photos with a wide lens throughout an evening.

I bought two of them for both my T2is. It makes me two times more productive. Waiting an hour for a 10 sec time lapse to finish is hell on earth... I could better spend my time fapping.
 

boatski

macrumors regular
Oct 16, 2008
200
0
I bought a lot of stuff the last two days.

Mother board and video card went out:
519G7WkSW%2BL._SL500_AA300_.jpg


41BuPq-OdHL._SL500_AA300_.jpg


A remote for my T2i:
416DTDsMmdL._SL500_AA300_.jpg


Cheap tripod to hold me over:
31xiVVXdQ1L._SL500_AA300_.jpg


Movie:
61qGnMCGtuL._SL500_AA300_.jpg


School books:
41w85yhW%2BFL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg


61W5b4wa-KL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg


61FKc8jbekL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg


41C0Kuo18YL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
 

rymack

macrumors regular
Apr 27, 2010
207
13
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Simply kick-ass! :cool:

Haven't heard the new Castles yet, but I LOVE their first album. They were to open for Nine Inch Nails a few years ago, but NIN had to cancel the night before I was going to drive down to Minneapolis due to Trent being ill. When they rescheduled the show, CC was not available to open, so we heard Boris instead...
 

stevenlangley1

macrumors regular
Jun 9, 2009
183
5
just ordered some Belkin Anti-glare screen protectors for my iP4. I have loved these things on my 2G and 3G iphones...:)

41rfRvyL6QL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
 

Ateace3

macrumors member
Dec 1, 2007
63
0
this better be in my possession by saturday...
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2010-08-18 at 2.20.18 AM.png
    Screen shot 2010-08-18 at 2.20.18 AM.png
    411.7 KB · Views: 59

sprtnbsblplya

macrumors regular
Jan 28, 2004
145
0
Arlington, VA
mind giving a review? I was thinking of getting that lens for my d90. How are you finding not having image stabilization?

Just played around a little bit so far, not too much. The trail I went on yesterday didn't have many opportunities and today is thunderstorms and leaving on a jetplane later.
I'm not a sports or action photographer so I don't miss IS. It would only add a couple stops anyways, I can't justify the huge price gap for that right now, maybe later. If I had the cash, I wouldn't hesitate to buy the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II. At 200mm on a crop body it is hard to keep it steady.
So far:
Lens is very solid, well built. Smooth action on zoom and manual focus rings. Well built tripod collar. The included lens hood is excellent, snaps on well and cuts down on stray light very well.
The autofocus is great, I really like the Sigma HSM in this model. It is very quiet, accurate, doesn't creep unless the subject has low contrast.
The f/2.8 is amazing. Not only does it allow you to shoot in lower light than the typical f/4 tele zooms, in good light it also expands your creative dof, both factors which ruled out the f/4 for me. This is my first tele zoom of my own. I played with the Canon 75-300mm zoom in the past, that thing was garbage compared to this (at 4x the price it should be, but still). I'm really pleased with the image quality.
I never played with the Canon 70-200 f/4L which I was considering besides this one, but on the retail websites I compared specs and this is what swayed me:
f/2.8 vs f/4, pretty huge deciding factor here.
Sigma includes a padded softcase for the lens.
Sigma includes a good tripod collar.
I have the Canon 20mm f/2.8 USM and 28-135mm f/3.5 IS USM. Comparing the USM in these to the HSM in the Sigma, I can't see much difference. HSM is great. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another lens with HSM in it.
I honestly don't have many good pictures for you to review right now, it has been insanely hazy in DC recently so any distant tele pics look like crap regardless of the lens. I can post some boring shots I took under a canopy of deciduous trees on a trail if you want.
 

zwaffel

macrumors newbie
Jul 30, 2010
20
0
Just got my Audioengine A5's.
My neighbors will love me!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0161.JPG
    IMG_0161.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 70

vnle

macrumors 6502
Jun 3, 2010
263
0
Maryland
Finally got a iPhone 4 - my iPhone 3G died on me so it was an impromptu and mad scramble to find an iPhone 4. A 6 hour search yesterday turned successful!

Oh and of course a case/pouch for my iPhone: the Vaja Classic Retro Slim Bag in Rabbit Grey (body) and Nautical Blue (stripe) - similar to the pic attached as it is not mine :cool:. Pic courtesy of OasisNYK.
 

Attachments

  • Vaja1.jpg
    Vaja1.jpg
    109.4 KB · Views: 57
  • iphone-4-reviews.jpg
    iphone-4-reviews.jpg
    36.6 KB · Views: 67

Jason Beck

macrumors 68000
Oct 19, 2009
1,913
0
Cedar City, Utah
Just played around a little bit so far, not too much. The trail I went on yesterday didn't have many opportunities and today is thunderstorms and leaving on a jetplane later.
I'm not a sports or action photographer so I don't miss IS. It would only add a couple stops anyways, I can't justify the huge price gap for that right now, maybe later. If I had the cash, I wouldn't hesitate to buy the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II. At 200mm on a crop body it is hard to keep it steady.
So far:
Lens is very solid, well built. Smooth action on zoom and manual focus rings. Well built tripod collar. The included lens hood is excellent, snaps on well and cuts down on stray light very well.
The autofocus is great, I really like the Sigma HSM in this model. It is very quiet, accurate, doesn't creep unless the subject has low contrast.
The f/2.8 is amazing. Not only does it allow you to shoot in lower light than the typical f/4 tele zooms, in good light it also expands your creative dof, both factors which ruled out the f/4 for me. This is my first tele zoom of my own. I played with the Canon 75-300mm zoom in the past, that thing was garbage compared to this (at 4x the price it should be, but still). I'm really pleased with the image quality.
I never played with the Canon 70-200 f/4L which I was considering besides this one, but on the retail websites I compared specs and this is what swayed me:
f/2.8 vs f/4, pretty huge deciding factor here.
Sigma includes a padded softcase for the lens.
Sigma includes a good tripod collar.
I have the Canon 20mm f/2.8 USM and 28-135mm f/3.5 IS USM. Comparing the USM in these to the HSM in the Sigma, I can't see much difference. HSM is great. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another lens with HSM in it.
I honestly don't have many good pictures for you to review right now, it has been insanely hazy in DC recently so any distant tele pics look like crap regardless of the lens. I can post some boring shots I took under a canopy of deciduous trees on a trail if you want.


I have the 24-70 2.8 L for my Canon and if I am shooting even with a little bit of light I don't notice it. Of course most of the time I am shooting wide open. It gives you some creamy bokeh and fast focus and the high shutter speeds at 2.8 outside when I am on location .. really once in a _great_ while, maybe one per shoot will be blurry. Out of.. 200 photos. I don't really miss i.s. at 2.8 on my lens. Stopped down, it is still a fast performer.. no issues yet.


I know my lens isn't a Sigma.. but I thought I would share my experience at 2,8 too. My next purchase is the 1.2 portrait lens :D Well after the 1ds mark ii.
 

puffnstuff

macrumors 65816
Jan 2, 2008
1,469
0
taco_bell_cantina_tacos.gif


I have tasted some pretty gnarly stuff in my time but those cantina tacos at Taco Bell are the nastiest things I have ever tried in my entire life.:eek:
 

creator2456

macrumors 68000
Jul 10, 2007
1,649
2
Chicago
Not a purchase in direct regards, but paid down my student loans and paid off a couple credit cards thanks to a financial aid refund. Now if I could only get the rest of the money the school owes me I should be credit card debt free.
 

nobunaga209

macrumors 6502a
Mar 13, 2009
812
21
TX
taco_bell_cantina_tacos.gif


I have tasted some pretty gnarly stuff in my time but those cantina tacos at Taco Bell are the nastiest things I have ever tried in my entire life.:eek:

Tried these two nights ago and I couldn't agree more. The pork one was at least edible but the chicken and steak however = yuck!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.