Hopefully the readings are accurate.Extended use of 13” and 11” are certainly contributing to dry eye. Not as bad as the mini-LED 12.9” did though. Still waiting for PWM #s for the M4 Pros and M2 Airs from a site like Notebookcheck. Planning to return my 11” today and order either a 13” Pro or 13” Air. The latter if it’s proven that PWM isn’t an issue. The former if they both have PWM. I’ll just have to limit use.
Edit: Notebookcheck just reviewed the 11" iPad Air and found no PWM. I'm assuming (hoping) that the 13" uses the same tech and also has no PWM. Just ordered one in Starlight. Shame they had no silver option to match the rest of my Mac stuff.
Test Apple iPad Air 11 (2024) Gen 6 - Das kraftvolle Apple-Tablet mit dem Identitätsproblem
Das Apple iPad Air 6 setzt auf den M2-Chip von Apple und ist nun in zwei Größen (11 Zoll und 13 Zoll) erhältlich. Ob sich ein Kauf des Apple-Tablet lohnt, lesen Sie im Testbericht von Notebookcheck.www.notebookcheck.com
Certainly worth an attempt. The 12.9 LED bothers my eyes quite a bit. I hope this is better than that. No real information on it yet, that I’ve seen. One Chinese video that seemed to say the frequency was in the 400-500 range but then the Tech Chap video saying it was higher than the 12.9 LED, which is 6401. Those obviously conflict. Waiting for something more concrete. Haven’t seen a review from Notebookcheck and they usually cover PWM.
Despite what they write, it is 480 Hz, and Notebookcheck's own graphs confirm that. That first graph is zoomed in 40x, probably near minimum brightness. I think the graph at 50% is more concerning, as it shows significant modulation.The Notebook Check Statetment of 240 Hz PWM suprises me, i read often in the last Days on russian and chinese Websites that it should be 480 Hz.
Regardless of the actual number, I also experienced eye strain with the 11" m4 iPad Pro. It is really a shame because it is a great piece of hardware. My 14 days expired yesterday, so I returned it to the Apple store and grabbed the new iPad Air, which is not causing eye strain problems.
Let's hope they get this fixed for the next version.
Anecdotally, I asked the Apple salesperson if he had any other people returning it because of eye strain. The response was negative. Perhaps I am in a small minority here.
Sorry for the confusion, I just wanted to confirm what you wrote - everybody (including notebookcheck's measurements) seem to agree it is 480 Hz, I don't know why they put 239 Hz in the text box.
Anecdotally, I asked the Apple salesperson if he had any other people returning it because of eye strain. The response was negative. Perhaps I am in a small minority here.
Sorry for the confusion, I just wanted to confirm what you wrote - everybody (including notebookcheck's measurements) seem to agree it is 480 Hz, I don't know why they put 239 Hz in the text box.
I feel like this is part of their training.In my opinion, not admitting to problems is absolutely typical of Apple. How often have there been "gates"? The Internet was full of them in many forums and Apple Support told me that they had never heard of such a problem, whether in the store or on the phone.
"Fixed?" No more blooming with "mini-LED" would require a per-pixel backlight, not even the Pro Display XDR has that.Maybe Apple should have just fixed the local dimming zones so the mini-LED panel in the iPad has no more blooming.
"Fixed?" No more blooming with "mini-LED" would require a per-pixel backlight, not even the Pro Display XDR has that.
That's not possible to fix. If you have dimming zones, you have blooming. That trade-off is tne whole idea behind mini-LED.Maybe Apple should have just fixed the local dimming zones so the mini-LED panel in the iPad has no more blooming.
That's not possible to fix. If you have dimming zones, you have blooming. That trade-off is tne whole idea behind mini-LED.