Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
IMG_9136.jpeg


Look at this unusable blurry image I just took with the camera button. It’s like looking through Mr Magoo’s glasses!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
My point is that most people don’t need it, but most people still run into the situation of their phone running hot. And running hot is a direct consequence of reaching processing levels where the SoC isn’t that efficient anymore, and is wasting battery to unnecessarily heat the surroundings.

It’s great that Apple is improving efficiency every year. But they are counteracting these improvements by also raising processing power every year (note how in the keynote they are comparing efficiency at the same processing performance, not at the respective peak performance), which most users don’t actually need.
They didn’t increase it one year, the iPhone 14 has the same chip as the 13 plus one more GPU core. This (rightfully) pissed people off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
Ok, I’m in Safari right now, and see a fleeting moment I want a photo of. Can you tell me a faster way to open the camera than the camera button?
For several years now on Samsung phones I've double-clicked the power button to launch the camera. So quick and convenient, and beats having to go back to the home screen to launch it. Works even if the phone is locked, so instant access to the camera.

Apple can easily add this in software for past iPhones without needing to introduce a dedicated camera button.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iPhone2019
Dor several years now on Samsung phones I've double-clicked the power button to launch the camera. So convenient and quick, and beats having to go back to the home screen to launch it.
That’s fair enough, and a pretty good solution. It won’t work for iPhones as that is already mapped to Apple Pay, and triple click for accessibility shortcut, but a quick muscle memory camera open is something smartphones should have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kitKAC
I should've been more clear. The primary purpose of all of those other buttons is not photo taking. The entire reason this whole new button was added was for taking photos, and it can't really be used for anything else. It's not a multi-purpose button (yet anyway).

Personally I'm not totally against it. But so far I'm also having an issue with it being kind of awkward. Like any other hardware or physical change, I'm sure it's something we'll all get better at and get used to over the next few weeks/months.



You're stretching a bit here (trolling a bit?) just to try to prove your point. ;)
As for the first half of your reply, I’m just being extra sarcastic, borderline mocking the logic of OP. I too think software is the problem to make that button awkward. Button itself feels good and definitely can see it’s not made cheap or simple.

As for the second half, the intention I guess is more or less the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
Absolutely. But I’m trying to point out, through example, that a) they shouldn’t remove something from the phone because he doesn’t personally like it, and b) key functions can justify their own physical button, even when the same action can be performed through the on-screen UI.

That makes sense, and personally I don't think it's useless - I was looking forward to it because I take 99% of my photos horizontally. But I do think there's a case to be made that (at least for some people) it's hard to take a photo with that button without a little shake happening because you have to give a little extra squeeze to get it to register. Maybe it's just how some of us are used to holding our phones. But it definitely adds more movement than tapping the screen, and it's harder to push than the volume button (maybe a case with a camera control cover would help that). I've also found it's actually harder to reach than tapping the screen as well, so it's not as helpful as I thought it would be prior to owning the device, at least so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iPhone2019
My old Pixel 3a had the "squeeze" to activate Google Assistant feature, and it would go off sometimes. Thankfully, Google has provided a sensitivity scale and the option to turn it off.
It worked well for me and I liked it. I think a double-squeeze would remove a lot of false positives.
 
That however is not a RAM issue since my wife‘s M4 iPad with 16GB RAM does it, too. It’s just how iOS/iPad OS is ‚designed‘.

You‘ll have to switch operating systems and hope they’ll do better (hint: they mostly don’t).
Yeah it’s definitely an app based issue because my phone (13 mini) only has 4gb of RAM, yet certain apps (e.g.B&H Photo) will open up to the EXACT spot even weeks later, while apps like Amazon will reload in just a couple hours.
 
My 15 pro is constantly refreshing apps/webpages, it's insane they didn't increase the RAM
It doesn’t matter if iOS caps the RAM per app at 256MB, which is pathetic in Today’s standards, and iOS just kills an app trying to use 257MB. I think nowadays Apple allows some apps to use more RAM but still. iOS just doesn't need 2TB of RAM Because it can’t, Literally can’t, use 2TB.
 
Apple could add something useful instead of the camera button nobody asked for. Like 16GB of RAM, the X80 modem, and a 1-inch main camera sensor. The hardware on the iPhone is quickly falling behind if they don't add these things. But Apple probably doesn't care. It's all about the money!
If you don’t want to use the Camera Button, turn it off. Your problem is solved and many other people who want to use the new button will still have the choice.
 
If you don’t want to use the Camera Button, turn it off. Your problem is solved and many other people who want to use the new button will still have the choice.
I won't buy the 16 Pro Max since it's such a letdown, but I plan on buying the 17 Pro Max. I hope the camera button is improved by then.
 
Y’all keep saying add more ram.

For what? iOS doesn’t lag like android on smaller ram. Android NEEDS the ram. Y’all just want it for the sake of having it.
I will say that more RAM is almost never a bad thing. Ironically, me browsing this very thread and switching to the camera and taking a couple of photos (via Camera Control) and then switching back to Safari sometimes caused Safari to completely reload.

I assume this is also a memory management issue as some of the apps used less recently than Safari don't need to reload and this is something I also experienced with early iOS versions on my 11 Pro back in the day (and it got better with updates), but it's an instance where more memory would've very likely helped.

Some Apple representatives say that more memory increases energy consumption and while that might be true to a certain (small) extent, I'd argue that more memory would result in fewer apps having to reload, which would actually decrease energy consumption.

But Apple probably didn't want to put more memory in their "Pro" phone than what they put in the iPad Pro (<1 TB) or entry-level MacBook Pro 🤣
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.