Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So far it's at the top of my list for when I upgrade in November but I have a feeling it'll get bumped by the Pixel 4 once I play with the 90 hz refresh. Just have a feeling that's a feature that you can't go back from once you try it.

You really can't as it spoils it for any other phone.

It is an absolute game changer and would expect this to be the norm in the next year for some of these flagships. I am not a fan at all of Samsung phones, OS, and their update process so the Note was never an option but good to see many others enjoying the line.

MKBHD said the exact things I have been thinking about this device since release in his review so that was a good watch.
 
Well bummer.. got my 150.00 samsung code yesterday... it can only be used on mobile accessories (figured that was the case), and it's a one time use only. Spend it all or don't, which is unfortunate as I wanted to order the galaxy buds and the tan leather case, which happens to be out of stock.

Has anyone seen the silver galaxy buds in person? I'm torn on which color to go with.
 
That’s more like it.

Seriously though, my own fault for “pre-ordering” later, but I ordered 10 days ago now and still have 2 more weeks of waiting!

That's annoying, here in the UK I got lucky as the one I want (Black unlocked 4g 256gb) was in stock for delivery. Aura Glow seems to be out of stock for all options though!
 
For anyone who still looking to get one, the $600 trade in offer has been extended to carrier models on the Samsung website.
Oh poo! My husband's arrives on Wednesday. Samsung really knows how to create a disincentive for preorders. Given that they deliver late anyway. Rubbish!
 
Alright, what does Samsung have against faces? I'd taken a photo in really poor light of my beautiful daughter. She is young and her face is flawless in the way young faces are. There is no need for the software to soft focus her face and make everything else crisp and clear. The photo was an amazing example of low light capabilities except for the weird beauty blur.

One thing I'm used to with iPhones is that when I get a new iPhone I can backup from a restore and essentially clone the phone I've been using. I thought I'd done that between my S10+ and Note 10+ but instead I am having to go through and re customize settings when I least expect it.

Anyway I need to figure out again how to turn this stupid face blurring off if possible. It does not make faces look prettier. It makes us look weird.

Carp! The beauty mode IS turned off. Okay well I will have to give the camera the benefit of a doubt because I did have to take the photo quickly. Maybe I didn't focus properly. I will have to do some experimenting. ...Here kitty kitty kitty....

that's my one complaint of Samsung photo processing. I don't have beauty mode or anything turned on and it just makes people's faces and skin kind of soft and almost oil painting like... did that with my kids last night. I also had Gcam installed and it did not do this. So It looks like I'll be using Gcam for people and samsung camera for everything else.

thing is, this isn't the first Samsung phone to be like this for me... all the previous phones from the last few years were very similar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
You'd think by now Samsung would catch on not everyone is a teenager who applies a million filters to photos. Normal people like the detail, blemishes and all!
I suppose. I can't say I like how Pixels make me look like the walking dead, but I can't say I like to have my face oddly blurred and the rest of me in crisp focus.

In happier news I really enjoyed watching an Amazon Prime video on this phone. I'm using the rugged case today and it has a nice built in kickstand to hold the display at a pleasant angle for video watching. I do wish this case had a twin with a folio cover. That would be perfect for my purposes.
 
that's my one complaint of Samsung photo processing. I don't have beauty mode or anything turned on and it just makes people's faces and skin kind of soft and almost oil painting like... did that with my kids last night. I also had Gcam installed and it did not do this. So It looks like I'll be using Gcam for people and samsung camera for everything else.

thing is, this isn't the first Samsung phone to be like this for me... all the previous phones from the last few years were very similar.
Okay thanks for posting that. So I don’t need to fear I did something wrong with how I took the picture.

I have this frustration also with iPhones. Only my iPhones make everything look uniformly oil painting-like in interior lighting conditions. Specifically indoors in a room lit by light coming from windows on an overcast day. That’s a pretty specific set of conditions but describes the conditions I most commonly deal with.
 
Alright, what does Samsung have against faces? I'd taken a photo in really poor light of my beautiful daughter. She is young and her face is flawless in the way young faces are. There is no need for the software to soft focus her face and make everything else crisp and clear. The photo was an amazing example of low light capabilities except for the weird beauty blur.

One thing I'm used to with iPhones is that when I get a new iPhone I can backup from a restore and essentially clone the phone I've been using. I thought I'd done that between my S10+ and Note 10+ but instead I am having to go through and re customize settings when I least expect it.

Anyway I need to figure out again how to turn this stupid face blurring off if possible. It does not make faces look prettier. It makes us look weird.

Carp! The beauty mode IS turned off. Okay well I will have to give the camera the benefit of a doubt because I did have to take the photo quickly. Maybe I didn't focus properly. I will have to do some experimenting. ...Here kitty kitty kitty....
I'm not so sure on this but my quick play taking some pictures of my Swiss army knife on a black marble worktop in low light in auto/night/pro mode on wide/normal/tele all showed depth of field is extremely short maybe an inch or so with the f1.5 force the f2.4 in pro mode and it is a little better

Turn on the lights above and it increase 3 fold or more immediately

It's a lens thing IMO and your daughters face is blurring/smoothing from short depth of field in low light

Everyone wants super low light and Bokeh results and that's part of the trade off small glass small sensor etc

Ok not done in a lab :) hand held in my kitchen

Images resized down but think you can still see the difference look at the number 1 on the CM ruler,

This is reasonable representation of brightness in kitchen with lights off

room.jpg

This is at F1.5

f1.5.jpg

This is at F2.4

2.4.jpg

This is auto with lights on

flash.jpg

PS Do not tell the wife I forgot to wipe the glass marks off first :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: csurfr and 5105973
I'm not so sure on this but my quick play taking some pictures of my Swiss army knife on a black marble worktop in low light in auto/night/pro mode on wide/normal/tele all showed depth of field is extremely short maybe an inch or so with the f1.5 force the f2.4 in pro mode and it is a little better

Turn on the lights above and it increase 3 fold or more immediately

It's a lens thing IMO and your daughters face is blurring/smoothing from short depth of field in low light

Everyone wants super low light and Bokeh results and that's part of the trade off small glass small sensor etc

Ok not done in a lab :) hand held in my kitchen

Images resized down but think you can still see the difference look at the number 1 on the CM ruler,

This is reasonable representation of brightness in kitchen with lights off

View attachment 854900

This is at F1.5

View attachment 854898

This is at F2.4

View attachment 854897

This is auto with lights on

View attachment 854899

PS Do not tell the wife I forgot to wipe the glass marks off first :)
Nice kitchen!
 
I'm not so sure on this but my quick play taking some pictures of my Swiss army knife on a black marble worktop in low light in auto/night/pro mode on wide/normal/tele all showed depth of field is extremely short maybe an inch or so with the f1.5 force the f2.4 in pro mode and it is a little better

Turn on the lights above and it increase 3 fold or more immediately

It's a lens thing IMO and your daughters face is blurring/smoothing from short depth of field in low light

Everyone wants super low light and Bokeh results and that's part of the trade off small glass small sensor etc

Ok not done in a lab :) hand held in my kitchen

Images resized down but think you can still see the difference look at the number 1 on the CM ruler,

This is reasonable representation of brightness in kitchen with lights off

PS Do not tell the wife I forgot to wipe the glass marks off first :)
Okay I think I’ll be able to take the kinds of shots I want but it will take practice and effort. Thanks for those pictures.

And yeah that is a gorgeous kitchen!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveJUAE
Okay I think I’ll be able to take the kinds of shots I want but it will take practice and effort. Thanks for those pictures.

And yeah that is a gorgeous kitchen!
Your welcome and thanks

I must say I am impressed with the colour accuracy of the cameras and even on the Note screen

Samsung were well known for having a bit too much vibrancy that some disliked but now :)
 
Both turned on with same graphic resolution and same clips
[doublepost=1566912263][/doublepost]Video enhancer on in both phones
It’s gotta be Video Enhancer I returned my iPhone XSMAX because it does not have Video Enhancer, like the Note 9 or S8+ or Note 10 Plus, co-workers all with iPhones always ask why my YouTube looks waaay better.
[doublepost=1566944859][/doublepost]Question for anyone who see this.

Is the Note 10 Plus 6.8” (non 5G) a 2 year phone ?
 
It’s gotta be Video Enhancer I returned my iPhone XSMAX because it does not have Video Enhancer, like the Note 9 or S8+ or Note 10 Plus, co-workers all with iPhones always ask why my YouTube looks waaay better.
[doublepost=1566944859][/doublepost]Question for anyone who see this.

Is the Note 10 Plus 6.8” (non 5G) a 2 year phone ?
Can’t have had any serious interest in an iPhone if that’s the reason you returned it.
 
Okay I think I’ll be able to take the kinds of shots I want but it will take practice and effort. Thanks for those pictures.

And yeah that is a gorgeous kitchen!

If you want good pics of people/pets indoors without natural light, you should download the pixel camera onto your note. Much more realistic photos in those situations. Look at the difference
 

Attachments

  • 20190825_220217.jpg
    20190825_220217.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 115
  • IMG_20190825_215815.jpg
    IMG_20190825_215815.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 154
So I was about to go to Best Buy and take advantage of their current promo, and then cancel my order with Samsung. Unfortunately, it seems the shortage in Canada is on the extreme side. Not a single unlocked Note 10+ at any Best Buy available. I honestly thought supply would not be an issue for the unlocked models. I mean, how many people are willing to pay $1500 outright? Obviously more than I ever thought would.
 
Which is which? I think both look really good.
The 2nd one where the dogs face is closer is taken by the pixel. The first one the dogs fur on its face looks smoothed out or painted on.

Funny enough that I actually showed these photos to a couple of none tech friends and they couldn't decide which photo was better. So it could be that the problem is overblown and the masses don't really care about the beauty mode. I can clearly see the difference though and prefer the more natural pixel picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
The 2nd one where the dogs face is closer is taken by the pixel. The first one the dogs fur on its face looks smoothed out or painted on.

Funny enough that I actually showed these photos to a couple of none tech friends and they couldn't decide which photo was better. So it could be that the problem is overblown and the masses don't really care about the beauty mode. I can clearly see the difference though and prefer the more natural pixel picture.

You bring up a good point about the fact that it might just be people like us that are over analyzing. I went back to my Google Photos last week and looked at all the photos I’ve taken over the last year, whether it was Samsung, Pixel, iPhone and when looking through them quickly I couldn’t really tell a difference at all and each of them were able to produce some amazing moments.
 
The 2nd one where the dogs face is closer is taken by the pixel. The first one the dogs fur on its face looks smoothed out or painted on.

Funny enough that I actually showed these photos to a couple of none tech friends and they couldn't decide which photo was better. So it could be that the problem is overblown and the masses don't really care about the beauty mode. I can clearly see the difference though and prefer the more natural pixel picture.
Ah cross posted. I am slow to put my posts up because I have to correct so many typos.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.