But can there not be an objective best, too? I mean what's the point of camera comparisons or tests of screens, and benchmarks and al the plethora of other measuresments. Are those all entirely irrelevant? Do they not offer any sort of value in assessment?
Why are people suddenly so afraid of saying something is best now? What a coincidence that now that iPhone isn't at top of their game on various fronts, we have a huge problem with the idea of "best". We have to now invoke subjectivity (which is a whole different thing). If all we have to go by is subjectivity, then what's the point of any of these discussions? Thats not to say subjectivity doesn't exist or isn't useful. But its also not the only thing that can be discussed.
I think it's 2-fold. One, has anything ever truly been the best? Other than Wayne Gretzky, name one thing or person that is truly the best in the opinion of everyone? There isnt, so anything involving someone proclaiming something is the best will always end in a debate on how something else is better.
And 2, on the Internet these sort of debates can get pretty juvenile, and I think that's why people now alway try to state those caveats, in order to try to prevent those juvenile comments. You'll see across several different types of reviews, not just phones. It's actually something that is getting tiresome, everyone seems to be scared about getting called out in the comments, so they just take a middle of the road approach to their review.