-2GB Ram (misleading)
Android is far far worse of a resourse hog than the iPhone but either way few smartphones will ever make use of any ram above 1GB. There will be no performance difference between the two due to ram
Not really misleading. Both Android and iOS apps could theoretically reference at least 2.5GB RAM if the device had that much memory. And there is a difference on iOS devices with less RAM than current models. You'll find iOS apps are forced to quit inelegantly a lot more frequently on older devices containing less RAM than current models due to memory constraints.
I haven't tested Jelly Bean yet, and I may never get the chance of my current Android device, but definitely I agree ICS has serious performance issues that can lock up devices pretty bad.
- A totally different lightning plug vs Standard Micro USB plug. (meaningless)
It's just a plug, both will eventually terminate in a USB plug or a peripheral. The real difference would be what comes after the plug ie the cable, which people will mainly care about the price of the lightning stuff until someone releases a chinese versions for $0.50
Not meaningless. Being able to use a universal plug to connect a range of different devices is definitely a positive thing. Being able to connect a camera to a Mac without playing hunt the Panasonic proprietary plug is definitely a positive thing. More and more non-Apple devices have been getting on board the Micro USB standard, and that's a positive thing for consumers.
Lightning also has a much higher throughput than USB.
Not really. "The advantages are mostly passed on through hardware design not necessarily around performance."
http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/12/apples-new-lightning-connector-what-it-does-and-doesnt-change/
- All the other marketing terms for their features. (very very misleading)
Almost all marketing is misleading by design. Even Apple marketing.
Each OS has thousands of features the other OS doesn't. To not list the many featurs iOS has while listing yours is and outright atempt to be misleading.
Their job is to sell Samsung devices not promote Apple's in a positive light. Advertising doesn't claim to be fair. They come up with the comparisons that are favorable to their device and advertise them. That's what any good company what do.
In any comparison between the features between the two it's worth noting that the iPhone 5 is made of better materials, has the Samsung Exynos 5 processor (Apple's version of) versus the SIII's Samsung Exynos 4 in the international Galaxy SIII. (The Us Galaxy SIII of course has different slower procesor than the SIII international version too). It's also thinner, has better microphones, has better call quality, has better cameras and better speakers.
It sounds like you been blessed with the opportunity to have tested the new iPhone 5 extensively having drawn so many positive conclusions about Apple's new phone.