But, fixing Squid on PPC would probably be easier than recompiling the Security framework (much less updating it).
Is it there in Macports? Or could you refer to it?
But, fixing Squid on PPC would probably be easier than recompiling the Security framework (much less updating it).
Yes, it's already in macports. However i build outside of macports because i don't like the canned configure options on a lot of things.Is it there in Macports? Or could you refer to it?
So strangely now OpenCL doesn't show up in BOINC anymore with the HD 4650 in ppc64 Debian, it definitely used to. I will try with the HD 4870 again. But still shows up with the HD 5770!First thing, this is interesting to learn. It leaves me to wonder whether ATI/AMD wrote firmware updates for native parsing of OpenCL/compute shader commands, or whether they wrote later drivers for linux to work with OpenCL. I honestly don’t know. Second, the link to that data was down, but I’ll try to check it again later. Third, off-topic: I used to eye Rensselaer to continue an area of research I was working on in grad school.
That’s awesome. Interestingly, I tried running the final BOINC UB client in Leopard on my G5 a couple of years ago. Despite leaving it running and having selected any of five active @home projects for BOINC to manage, I was unable to get any of those projects to send chunks to process. I sussed it to the G5 being far too slow for what those projects needed. In the end, I’ve only managed to get BOINC projects to run on my later Intel Macs.
Build 10A286 is notable for a couple of reasons: it was the first developer build to run a completely Cocoa-based Finder, and it was the final build to explore zfs support before Apple yanked it.
Visually speaking, however, I can attest from applied use that even Build 10A96 is different visually from Leopard: default gamma settings are a slight bit higher (more contrasty); and system type display (dfonts) is slightly tighter, much as default grid spacing in Finder also is. Many of these elements have remained consistent across all the Developer builds and into the retail editions. If you want, I have some screencaps buried somewhere displaying some of these visible differences.
It helps that my test mule, a PowerBook, has both Build 10A96 and 10.5.8 on different partitions, and running both makes it possible to run screen cap side-by-sides, and it’s also possible to bring over 10A96 dfont elements to Leopard to implement those tighter-kerned fonts.
That said, yes, QuickTime X elements became visible from Build 10A286, and some of the Cocoa-only elements for Finder are not present in the Carbonized Finder on Builds 10A96 through 10A261.
You're facing two major challenges with WebKit for PowerPC MacOS.Wish i could pinpoint squids issue on 10.4/10.5. I've gotten squid4 to build on tiger and not crash as often as the leopard build. At times i can browse for hours without issue. Other times it'll crash within minutes. When it works it's great with tenfourkit and leopard-webkit.
I do also have a mac mini running squid under Linux, and even though LWK is old, it still renders better than tenfourfox/interwebppc on select sites, and its faster to render. It'd be awesome to get a newer webkit to build, even without the security framework. Squid proxy fixes that, and having a browser that could render github properly would be awesome.
A bit off topic, but i want to know how the dev for the wayfarer browser on MorphOS was able to build current webkit for powerpc with the updated security frameworks. Unfortunately his source isn't publicly available to look at.
Cheers
You're facing two major challenges with WebKit for PowerPC MacOS.
Due to these challenges you need to calculate at least 4 weeks half time work in order to update JavaScriptCore/WebCore/WebKit to the next major release, which comes every year - for a fully experienced developer. The first time that would take half a year I'd say in order to get it all right.
- The JavaScriptCore framework needs to work almost perfectly or the browser becomes virtually unusable.
- The WebCore and WebKit frameworks are deeply integrated into the OS, so one needs to backport many OS API calls to either private, often slightly incomplete API (so called SPI) calls to other OS frameworks or maintain and extend existing workarounds.
Furthermore you'll not be able to directly update to the current release. You would have to update release by release. That would mean 6 months for the first year's release update and 1 month for each subsequent year of WebKit development, if you're able to invest 2-4 hours of daily work.
Yeah, this looks like a no-go. Anyone with sufficient expertise will not have that much of a free time on an ongoing basis, and for anyone without it just becomes unfeasible.
Do you have an idea about Mozilla-based browsers? What will be needed to update from TFF to something contemporary?
As long as unaccelerated rendering and unaccelerated JavaScript is supported by the code base it shouldn't be too difficult to get something up and (slowly) running.Yeah, this looks like a no-go. Anyone with sufficient expertise will not have that much of a free time on an ongoing basis, and for anyone without it just becomes unfeasible.
Do you have an idea about Mozilla-based browsers? What will be needed to update from TFF to something contemporary?
Have you tinkered about with Interweb-PPC? It is probably the most current, Mozilla-based browser one can use on PPC these days. It’s my go-to browser on SL-PPC.
I think it is just a simplified version of TFF, no? But I can check it, likely gonna build fine. Arctic Fox is arguably more interesting though.
Wait. Is he allowed to do that? Webkit is licensed under the lgpl.A bit off topic, but i want to know how the dev for the wayfarer browser on MorphOS was able to build current webkit for powerpc with the updated security frameworks. Unfortunately his source isn't publicly available to look at.
I don't know. It might be available upon request as i've seen with other projects.Is he allowed to do that?
I got Sonnet Tempo card, and here is the problem: while it is recognized and works in Leopard, 10A190 fails to boot – KP on start-up.
Ideally, I would like to have it working in 10A190.
If that is not possible, at least I want it to be ignored by 10A190, so that I can use that disk with Leopard or FreeBSD.
Obviously, pulling the card out every time is not a feasible solution.
Any ideas?
dev pci3
" reg" delete-property
" interrupts" delete-property
" none" encode-string " compatible" property
device-end
mac-boot
Update:
1. 10A96 also fails with KP at the boot. Any idea how to fix the kernel to enable support for PCIe SSDs?
2. This makes booting 10A190 possible (removing PCIe card from the current boot):
Code:dev pci3 " reg" delete-property " interrupts" delete-property " none" encode-string " compatible" property device-end mac-boot
(Device path depends on the slot used.)
Not yet sure. A quick review (without testing) of kexts from the retail version of 10.6 doesn’t suggest much, other than maybe IOPCIFamily.kext (as it’s not anything noted on Table 4, you might want to compare versions of this kext between 10A96/10A190 and, say, 10.6.0 and 10.6.8. As memory serves, it was the same version supplied with 10.5.8, which is why it was not included in the table.
Safe boot did not help, so I assumed kexts are not responsible. Or safe boot does not disable these?
PCIe 1.0. That is 250 MB/s per lane.Are the A1117 G5s PCIe 1.0 or 2.0?
PCIe 1.0. That is 250 MB/s per lane.
PCIe 2.0 only came with the 2008 Mac Pro.
There you go https://www.pcworld.pl/ftp/producent/mac/joel-barriere.html
It's a online PC mag in Polish. (Who would have thought it). Just keep clicking on red buttons with download logo.
Also, to add to the current 10.6 SDK discussion - take a look at Pacifist's plist and at DTSDKName specifically
I also assume you guys are familiar with these:
XcodeVersionInfo – MacPorts
trac.macports.org
Not dead at all. I just checked. Downloaded like a charm.Link to OnyX 2.2.5 is dead, unfortunately. We have to re-upload it elsewhere and update the Wiki.