Is that a failure of the OS, or the software?
Of course no one should judge an OS by its ability to run an application but I think a point was made here: One should choose the OS that runs the applications he/she needs/wants to use.
Is that a failure of the OS, or the software?
You missed the joke. The fish is a "betta fish," which implies that Windows 7 released so far has been betas. The final RTM version will have a different default wallpaper.The default desktop theme with the fish is ugly beyound belief.
Of course no one should judge an OS by its ability to run an application but I think a point was made here: One should choose the OS that runs the applications he/she needs/wants to use.
I think if you are talking about feature changes then you are correct. For cosmetic changes feedback and telemetry are being used to improve the user experience. There have been a few blogs from the engineering team where they have highlighted improvements that have been made based on feedback. They are putting emphasis on this aspect to show that lessons have been learnt from the Vista fiasco.I sent tons of it, before I read on Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows that M$ doesn't bother reading it. They have a different beta program than they had for Vista, where feedback from early testers was incorporated in the system... this time they have a single beta and a single release candidate going out, and everything was already set in stone long before the public beta was released. But I still send feedback sometimes anyway, it's a good way to vent frustration even if it's going straight into a black hole.
I think this was Paul's follow up on that post: http://community.winsupersite.com/b...-re-listening-to-your-windows-7-feedback.aspx.Link to that?
Is that a failure of the OS, or the software?
Seriously?? Who restarts or turns off their computers anymore unless there is an update.
Which one of the XP interfaces? You cannot possibly mean the blue one, an uglier UI never existed. The silver one I put up with for a few years, but eventually replaced it with a custom UI out of pure boredom.
I am talking about the blue one. I love it, and it brings back memories.
Laptops.
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/20589/
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/20602/
If you consider that piece of junk faster (and better) than the cheapest MacBook, you're a fool.
MacDailyNews is a very nice website. It's saying the truth and always brings the latest Apple news.Ha! MacDailyNews! I almost forgot about those clowns. They're just scary. The Baghdad Bobs of the Mac Community. They way they tweak their messages to fill every single word full of utter contempt for everything non-Mac is straight out of Russian hate propaganda from the Stalin era. "See the enemy flee like the dogs they are, on what was to be another day of glorious victory for our brethren in the Communist Party..."
Yes, Karen is an actress (duhh). But this chick who is lying through her teeth about a PC "devouring half her paper" was, of course, a "real user". Not of Macs though, but definitely something you smoke or inject.
Yes, Karen is an actress (duhh). But this chick who is lying through her teeth about a PC "devouring half her paper" was, of course, a "real user". Not of Macs though, but definitely something you smoke or inject.
Priceless. I joked about how they sound like Baghdad Bob, or Russian communist propaganda through newspapers like Pravda (which means "the truth") and you respond by stating that MacDailyNews is "saying the truth".MacDailyNews is a very nice website. It's saying the truth and always brings the latest Apple news.
Maybe if the sound had been off, but her ridiculous story is a turnoff on par with Bruce Vilanch in a bikini. "The PC went beep-beep-beep-beep and half my paper was gone"... yeah, right before the pink elephant humped the purple sheep...Yeah but c'mon at least that ad was sexually arousing.
Priceless. I joked about how they sound like Baghdad Bob, or Russian communist propaganda through newspapers like Pravda (which means "the truth") and you respond by stating that MacDailyNews is "saying the truth".
If that bizarre site is your daily news source, I understand now why you appear brainwashed. I always suspected that the site was started by someone who wanted to create a parody on rabid Mac fanboys, because their PC hatred is just so over the top it's surreal.
.
I think some might find that site bizarre because the editorial comments are so biased against MS that it does not really deliver on the facts.Bizarre site? Why, because it criticizes Windows?
I think some might find that site bizarre because the editorial comments are so biased against MS that it does not really deliver on the facts.
Microsoft has been doing nothing but stupid things. It's normal for MacDailyNews to criticize them.
On a separate but related note, I would like to call for restrictions on Internet access in kindergartens.
Bizarre site? Why, because it criticizes Windows?
I also find surreal the impossibility of PC fanboys to accept the reality, it's really...depressing.
Likewise, I find it hard to believe that you can't accept the fact that PC's are the right choice for some people. Macs are clearly not for everyone.
I find Macs acceptable only for people who cannot afford them at all.
...What? Are you saying the only people who should have Macs are those who can't afford them?
I find PCs acceptable only for people who cannot afford Macs at all.
really?
how may i run my design modeling software and the like....you know, the software that has no mac equivalent?