I will recycle for you, at no charge!All our M1-SSDs will DIE within 2 years and we can do absolutely nothing about it but throwing away our devices.
I will recycle for you, at no charge!All our M1-SSDs will DIE within 2 years and we can do absolutely nothing about it but throwing away our devices.
All our M1-SSDs will DIE within 2 years and we can do absolutely nothing about it but throwing away our devices.
My 256GB M1-SSD is currently on track to die after 100 years..All our M1-SSDs will DIE within 2 years and we can do absolutely nothing about it but throwing away our devices.
Well if mine dies within 2 years I'm taking it to the Apple Store and giving it to them to fix because I got AppleCare+ for my M1 MBP..All our M1-SSDs will DIE within 2 years and we can do absolutely nothing about it but throwing away our devices.
Your last post was more on-point to the issue. Actually, soldered on is more reliable, esp. in a laptop.I still can't get over it...why they soldered SSD to the motherboard knowing that swap would have such a huge impact on SSDs lifespan. For me it's like spitting into face and making this machine good candidate for PLANNED OBSCOLESCENCE PRIZE WINNER.
How do you mean? Performance? Note that if your machine break after 3 years of warranty (including Apple Care) and that will be your SSD, well, in case if you are lucky you have a backup, BUT...make a Genius Bar Reservation and get help from Apple Support and see how much they are gonna charge you for new SSD...I bet it might be a little pricey as we all know how much their service costs. NIHIL NOVI SUB NOLE.Your last post was more on-point to the issue. Actually, soldered on is more reliable, esp. in a laptop.
the real MB PRO is the 4 port model, the 2 port model MB PRO was a laptop PRO in name only. The 4 port model will get 14" XDR screen, more ports(SD card, HDMI, USB C), M1X later this year.I still can't get over it...why they soldered SSD to the motherboard knowing that swap would have such a huge impact on SSDs lifespan. For me it's like spitting into face and making this machine good candidate for PLANNED OBSCOLESCENCE PRIZE WINNER.
Even my MacBook Pro is no longer PRO as it used to be in the past. What makes it PRO? 100 nits more? 1000 pts more in Cn23? little bigger touchpad? They ruined that PRO distinction and definitely PRO can't mean putting me at risk and not giving me a choice.
800MB+ in what time period?So i finally disabled caching on all my browsers and indeed, the impact was very easy to see. For example, chrome/firefox was writing maybe 10 MB per 5 seconds or so. After disabling caching, it wont go up at all.
I think that is my only issue on my MBA. the high kernel_task writes does not seem to be a problem on my laptop, I only see about 800MB+ of data written by kernel_task. This is ok right? IIRC people have 1 TB or so of kernal_task writes
I can't speak for the M1 users but already on macOS Catalina I have high data written on storage (Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB) without SSD swap.All our M1-SSDs will DIE within 2 years and we can do absolutely nothing about it but throwing away our devices.
Pay for what? For an unusable machine?Before you just throw them away, please consider putting them on eBay or Craigslist. There are plenty of people on this thread who will pay you very green dollars for them.
They won't be dead in 3 years. If they died then, Apple would lose many millions, even with AppleCare.Pay for what? For an unusable machine?
800GB+ of kernel_task in about 6 hours or so. so lets say i have it on for 12 hours, it should be at the max 2GB. This number is ok, yes? Also, this number was before I disabled browser caching. Now that it is off, it shouldnt be this high the next time i use it800MB+ in what time period?
I still can't get over it...why they soldered SSD to the motherboard knowing that swap would have such a huge impact on SSDs lifespan. For me it's like spitting into face and making this machine good candidate for PLANNED OBSCOLESCENCE PRIZE WINNER.
Even my MacBook Pro is no longer PRO as it used to be in the past. What makes it PRO? 100 nits more? 1000 pts more in Cn23? little bigger touchpad? They ruined that PRO distinction and definitely PRO can't mean putting me at risk and not giving me a choice.
Go into Terminal, and type ‘uptime’. Then go into Activity Monitor and go on the Disk tab, and divide number of GB written to the SSD by the hours of uptime. Anything below 5GB/hour and you have nothing to worry about.800GB+ of kernel_task in about 6 hours or so. so lets say i have it on for 12 hours, it should be at the max 2GB. This number is ok, yes? Also, this number was before I disabled browser caching. Now that it is off, it shouldnt be this high the next time i use it
Thanks synchronizer. I will try this later.Go into Terminal, and type ‘uptime’. Then go into Activity Monitor and go on the Disk tab, and divide number of GB written to the SSD by the hours of uptime. Anything below 5GB/hour and you have nothing to worry about.
From what you’re saying it sounds like you likely have nothing to worry about anyway enjoy your mac!
Many tabs are not a problem; used well they can be a great advantage (I have 51 open right now). You should install the extension "Auto Tab Discard" and you can have all the tabs open that you want without a memory issue.Thanks synchronizer. I will try this later.
I guess there is one more thing I need to keep an eye out for - many tabs I do use many tabs in my browsers and I have not tried this yet. Will monitor this and report back
Allow me to clarify one thing: "divide the number of GB written to the SSD". For this, should I be looking at the kernel_task or the "data written" in the bottom right?Go into Terminal, and type ‘uptime’. Then go into Activity Monitor and go on the Disk tab, and divide number of GB written to the SSD by the hours of uptime. Anything below 5GB/hour and you have nothing to worry about.
From what you’re saying it sounds like you likely have nothing to worry about anyway enjoy your mac!
Data WrittenAllow me to clarify one thing: "divide the number of GB written to the SSD". For this, should I be looking at the kernel_task or the "data written" in the bottom right?
Did you mean 800MB+? If yes, that’s a pretty low number. Just curios, what’s your usage like.800GB+ of kernel_task in about 6 hours or so. so lets say i have it on for 12 hours, it should be at the max 2GB. This number is ok, yes? Also, this number was before I disabled browser caching. Now that it is off, it shouldnt be this high the next time i use it
Yes 800 MB. I will still keep monitoring it though just to be safe. My usage is just browsing, MS office, etc. Nothing heavy.Did you mean 800MB+? If yes, that’s a pretty low number. Just curios, what’s your usage like.
Ok thank you. Will keep monitoring.Data Written
After a full 24 hrs, writings from swapping are just at 30Gb mark... that's a success, comparing to past versions.As a heads-up, 11.4b1 seems to be using swap less aggressively than 11.3. Gonna monitor it further, but the first day of my usual workload is rather promising.