Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
All our M1-SSDs will DIE within 2 years and we can do absolutely nothing about it but throwing away our devices.

Gee, aren't you a bright ray of optimistic sunshine.

There's plenty you can do, Eeyore.

If you're concerned, buy AppleCare. Or sell your system and move to something else.

Edit - turns out @nothingtoseehere was kidding... oh well. :D
 
Last edited:

daverdfw

macrumors member
Aug 23, 2009
74
53
just installed Big Sur 11.4B1 extremely small sample size of 30 min uptime but i am only at 899MB of kernel_task writes. I have never seen it this small. Will update after some more normal usage today.
 

stigman

macrumors regular
Dec 2, 2014
181
67
Europe
I still can't get over it...why they soldered SSD to the motherboard knowing that swap would have such a huge impact on SSDs lifespan. For me it's like spitting into face and making this machine good candidate for PLANNED OBSCOLESCENCE PRIZE WINNER.
Even my MacBook Pro is no longer PRO as it used to be in the past. What makes it PRO? 100 nits more? 1000 pts more in Cn23? little bigger touchpad? They ruined that PRO distinction and definitely PRO can't mean putting me at risk and not giving me a choice.
 
Last edited:

leons

macrumors 6502a
Apr 22, 2009
662
344
I still can't get over it...why they soldered SSD to the motherboard knowing that swap would have such a huge impact on SSDs lifespan. For me it's like spitting into face and making this machine good candidate for PLANNED OBSCOLESCENCE PRIZE WINNER.
Your last post was more on-point to the issue. Actually, soldered on is more reliable, esp. in a laptop.
 

stigman

macrumors regular
Dec 2, 2014
181
67
Europe
Your last post was more on-point to the issue. Actually, soldered on is more reliable, esp. in a laptop.
How do you mean? Performance? Note that if your machine break after 3 years of warranty (including Apple Care) and that will be your SSD, well, in case if you are lucky you have a backup, BUT...make a Genius Bar Reservation and get help from Apple Support and see how much they are gonna charge you for new SSD...I bet it might be a little pricey as we all know how much their service costs. NIHIL NOVI SUB NOLE.
My definition on reliability is to have a choice. It seems like here I'm very limited by soldering SSD to that board and I can't replace it by myself in case something happened.
 

wirtandi

macrumors regular
Feb 3, 2021
179
179
So i finally disabled caching on all my browsers and indeed, the impact was very easy to see. For example, chrome/firefox was writing maybe 10 MB per 5 seconds or so. After disabling caching, it wont go up at all.

I think that is my only issue on my MBA. the high kernel_task writes does not seem to be a problem on my laptop, I only see about 800MB+ of data written by kernel_task. This is ok right? IIRC people have 1 TB or so of kernal_task writes
 

Kung gu

Suspended
Oct 20, 2018
1,379
2,434
I still can't get over it...why they soldered SSD to the motherboard knowing that swap would have such a huge impact on SSDs lifespan. For me it's like spitting into face and making this machine good candidate for PLANNED OBSCOLESCENCE PRIZE WINNER.
Even my MacBook Pro is no longer PRO as it used to be in the past. What makes it PRO? 100 nits more? 1000 pts more in Cn23? little bigger touchpad? They ruined that PRO distinction and definitely PRO can't mean putting me at risk and not giving me a choice.
the real MB PRO is the 4 port model, the 2 port model MB PRO was a laptop PRO in name only. The 4 port model will get 14" XDR screen, more ports(SD card, HDMI, USB C), M1X later this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stigman

leons

macrumors 6502a
Apr 22, 2009
662
344
So i finally disabled caching on all my browsers and indeed, the impact was very easy to see. For example, chrome/firefox was writing maybe 10 MB per 5 seconds or so. After disabling caching, it wont go up at all.

I think that is my only issue on my MBA. the high kernel_task writes does not seem to be a problem on my laptop, I only see about 800MB+ of data written by kernel_task. This is ok right? IIRC people have 1 TB or so of kernal_task writes
800MB+ in what time period?
 

Andrea Filippini

macrumors 6502
Jun 27, 2020
394
339
Tuscany, Italy
All our M1-SSDs will DIE within 2 years and we can do absolutely nothing about it but throwing away our devices.
I can't speak for the M1 users but already on macOS Catalina I have high data written on storage (Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB) without SSD swap.
In this session I haven't used torrent client to download files and I have only used Chrome, Spotify and WhatsApp Desktop without downloading anything.
Basically over 11 GB of data written with basic usage.
Here the attachments:

Schermata 2021-04-22 alle 23.40.31.png


Schermata 2021-04-22 alle 23.41.35.png


I have bought the renewed machine and previously the storage was a Crucial MX200 500 GB with already 160 TB of data written and in fact the performance especially in write speed was awful and the supplier has switched to a Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB for free.
Now with a fresh 1 TB SSD I have basically no fear about storage longevity but users who think to buy a M1 with 256/512GB soldered storage should meditate about the purchase.
Furthermore macOS Big Sur on M1 machines uses a lot of swap on storage so the data written are insanely high.
There is a lot of speculation in this topic between users but mathematics isn't a matter of opinion.
Apple SSD have the MLC type flash memory and the estimated TBW are unquestionable.
Before say goodbye to your SSD you will have the typical loss of performance and already in this scenario you won't able to replace it.
If you used to buy a new machine every 2/3 years well, in the other case you have to pay the Apple tax to upgrade the storage at the time of purchase.
 

wirtandi

macrumors regular
Feb 3, 2021
179
179
800MB+ in what time period?
800GB+ of kernel_task in about 6 hours or so. so lets say i have it on for 12 hours, it should be at the max 2GB. This number is ok, yes? Also, this number was before I disabled browser caching. Now that it is off, it shouldnt be this high the next time i use it
 

Spudlicious

macrumors 6502a
Nov 21, 2015
936
818
Bedfordshire, England
I still can't get over it...why they soldered SSD to the motherboard knowing that swap would have such a huge impact on SSDs lifespan. For me it's like spitting into face and making this machine good candidate for PLANNED OBSCOLESCENCE PRIZE WINNER.
Even my MacBook Pro is no longer PRO as it used to be in the past. What makes it PRO? 100 nits more? 1000 pts more in Cn23? little bigger touchpad? They ruined that PRO distinction and definitely PRO can't mean putting me at risk and not giving me a choice.

Can I suggest that Apple know swap will not have a huge impact on SSD life for any significant number of users? Haven't they demonstrated that confidence by launching the 24" iMac using an (apparently) identical M1 SoC to that of the M1 Air and Pro and of course the same unified memory architecture?

Soldered-in RAM and other memory including SSD is pretty much how circuit boards are made in reflow ovens nowadays, if not yet by all manufacturers. Yes that does mean component-level repairs are in practical terms ancient history but that has been the direction of travel for electronics since the advent of large scale integration.

What makes it Pro is Apple naming it thus. It's marketing, it's product differentiation, it's distinguishing the line from the entry level Air range. You didn't think Pro means Professional, did you?

And you did have a choice, you chose to buy the computer. You made a good choice :)
 

TheSynchronizer

macrumors 6502
Dec 2, 2014
443
729
800GB+ of kernel_task in about 6 hours or so. so lets say i have it on for 12 hours, it should be at the max 2GB. This number is ok, yes? Also, this number was before I disabled browser caching. Now that it is off, it shouldnt be this high the next time i use it
Go into Terminal, and type ‘uptime’. Then go into Activity Monitor and go on the Disk tab, and divide number of GB written to the SSD by the hours of uptime. Anything below 5GB/hour and you have nothing to worry about.

From what you’re saying it sounds like you likely have nothing to worry about anyway:) enjoy your mac!
 
  • Like
Reactions: wirtandi

wirtandi

macrumors regular
Feb 3, 2021
179
179
Go into Terminal, and type ‘uptime’. Then go into Activity Monitor and go on the Disk tab, and divide number of GB written to the SSD by the hours of uptime. Anything below 5GB/hour and you have nothing to worry about.

From what you’re saying it sounds like you likely have nothing to worry about anyway:) enjoy your mac!
Thanks synchronizer. I will try this later.

I guess there is one more thing I need to keep an eye out for - many tabs :D I do use many tabs in my browsers and I have not tried this yet. Will monitor this and report back
 

leons

macrumors 6502a
Apr 22, 2009
662
344
Thanks synchronizer. I will try this later.

I guess there is one more thing I need to keep an eye out for - many tabs :D I do use many tabs in my browsers and I have not tried this yet. Will monitor this and report back
Many tabs are not a problem; used well they can be a great advantage (I have 51 open right now). You should install the extension "Auto Tab Discard" and you can have all the tabs open that you want without a memory issue.
 

wirtandi

macrumors regular
Feb 3, 2021
179
179
Go into Terminal, and type ‘uptime’. Then go into Activity Monitor and go on the Disk tab, and divide number of GB written to the SSD by the hours of uptime. Anything below 5GB/hour and you have nothing to worry about.

From what you’re saying it sounds like you likely have nothing to worry about anyway:) enjoy your mac!
Allow me to clarify one thing: "divide the number of GB written to the SSD". For this, should I be looking at the kernel_task or the "data written" in the bottom right?
 

Mc0

macrumors regular
Nov 6, 2017
188
369
800GB+ of kernel_task in about 6 hours or so. so lets say i have it on for 12 hours, it should be at the max 2GB. This number is ok, yes? Also, this number was before I disabled browser caching. Now that it is off, it shouldnt be this high the next time i use it
Did you mean 800MB+? If yes, that’s a pretty low number. Just curios, what’s your usage like.
 

ambient_light

macrumors member
Feb 23, 2021
59
65
As a heads-up, 11.4b1 seems to be using swap less aggressively than 11.3. Gonna monitor it further, but the first day of my usual workload is rather promising.
After a full 24 hrs, writings from swapping are just at 30Gb mark... that's a success, comparing to past versions.
Also, I've noticed improvements in the memory usage efficiency - swapping doesn't start until higher memory pressure with lower amount free memory, and swap file size gets decreased faster than before.

So, looks like after months of complaints, someone finally cared at Apple and fixed a glaring bug in paging/swapping algorithm ... and even tweaked memory pressure parameters as a bonus. Fingers crossed :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.