Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The 2023 Apple Watch Series 9: What to Expect From Apple This Fall
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Too many years without innovation already. It's become a boring product and the competition has clearly caught up.
Blood glucose has been rumored for 6-7 years already.
What about the "clinic on a wrist" rumor posted here a few months ago ? It would monitor body hydration, electrolytes and alcohol.
What about blood pressure ? Some watches do it and there were rumors 2 years ago https://www.macrumors.com/2021/05/03/apple-watch-blood-pressure-glucose-alcohol/
What about the fat % and body composition ? Samsung watches do it if you give them an initial value, and it works similarly to doing an ECG on the watch. https://www.samsung.com/levant/supp...dy-composition-with-the-galaxy-watch4-series/
What about sleep apnea ? Rumored for years.
What about all those independent studies who mentioned the Apple Watch could be used to detect this or that? (Depression, COVID, Sickle Disease, Arrhythmias and so on and so on)
www.forbes.com
www.forbes.com
www.macrumors.com
techcrunch.com
Blood glucose has been rumored for 6-7 years already.
What about the "clinic on a wrist" rumor posted here a few months ago ? It would monitor body hydration, electrolytes and alcohol.
What about blood pressure ? Some watches do it and there were rumors 2 years ago https://www.macrumors.com/2021/05/03/apple-watch-blood-pressure-glucose-alcohol/
What about the fat % and body composition ? Samsung watches do it if you give them an initial value, and it works similarly to doing an ECG on the watch. https://www.samsung.com/levant/supp...dy-composition-with-the-galaxy-watch4-series/
What about sleep apnea ? Rumored for years.
What about all those independent studies who mentioned the Apple Watch could be used to detect this or that? (Depression, COVID, Sickle Disease, Arrhythmias and so on and so on)
The Apple Watch Will Be Used To Study Depression, Here’s How
A UCLA study will use data harvested from iPhones, Apple Watches and Bedsit sleep trackers to better understand the relationship between factors like sleep patterns, exercise and heart rate, and symptoms of depression and anxiety.
www.forbes.com
Apple Watch Can Detect Covid-19 Before Symptoms Arise, New Study Shows
A new study reveals that Apple Watch and some other smartwatches are capable of spotting whether a wearer has Covid-19 even before testing confirms it.
www.forbes.com
Apple Watch Could Help Treat Sickle Cell Disease Symptoms, Study Suggests
The Apple Watch can help treat a key symptom of sickle cell disease and changes to Apple's speech recognition algorithm could help people with a...
www.macrumors.com
New study shows Apple Watch can detect heart arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation | TechCrunch
Continuing research by Stanford and Apple from the 2017 Apple Heart Study, which managed to enroll more than 400,000 participants and became one of the
techcrunch.com
Last edited:
I was hoping Apple was going to take cycling seriously when they introduced the Ultra.
I was expecting the workout app on Ultra to at least support BLE cycling accessories like cadence and power sensors.
Without pairing to sensors, the workout app uses speed when calculating calories burned during outdoor cycling workouts. I accidentally set it to an outdoor cycling workout when I was on my indoor trainer, and the watch credited me with 0 active calories.
Speaking of my indoor trainer, the Apple Watch really should broadcast heart rate so I can use it with my bike computer and on Apple TV apps like Rouvy or Zwfit indoors. I only get heart rate from the Watch in the fitness+ app which doesn’t support cadence and power (even though Apple TV supports BLE sensors in other cycling apps).
That would be interesting:
Ad more external sensors and more training metrics on watchOS.
I think Apple will do more on watchOS. The AW Hardware is good enough (except the AW glas -> scratches) and since the last 2-3 AW: there is nothing new.
But not in Europe. Thanks😎
Yes prices increase, but what will happen:
You will have more price discounts:
AW Ultra on Amazon is always 900 €. (Almost 10%)
Same for Garmin Fenix 7:
699 -> 540€.
Wearables demand has decreased.
I wasn’t aware Garmin controlled ANT+, but I recently bought a cheap (non-Garmin) bike computer with ANT+ for my wife, so any licensing fees are minimal.
At any rate, BLE support in the workout app would be simple to implement, along with allowing the Watch to transmit heart rate.
I’m firmly in the Apple ecosystem, and I’m annoyed I had to buy a separate heart rate monitor to use with my bike computer for outdoor riding, and with my Apple TV for indoor rides on Rouvy or Zwift!
Transmitting heart rate over BLE wouldn’t reduce the Apple Watch’s mass market appeal. But it would mean I could use it with my Apple TV on an indoor bike running cycling apps (or on my bike computer outdoors).
Letting the workout app pair with cycling sensors for cadence and power would not affect the Watch’s mass market appeal, but it would mean the workout app would have relevant data to calculate calories burned instead of just using speed (which is different on a mountain bike or road bike, paved trail vs gravel trail, etc…).
Apple is forcing me to buy external heart rate monitors and bike computers from companies like Garmin, which starts to make the Apple ecosystem a little less sticky…
I‘m a big fan of John Gruber’s takes when it comes to Apple, but unless Apple starts to take workouts seriously, he is wrong about Garmin being worried about the Ultra. I wanted to buy the Ultra at launch, but it offered nothing for me as a cyclist that my Series 7 didn’t. It still forces me to need products from companies like Garmin. The annoying part to me as an Apple fan is that the functionally could be enabled in software, but Apple chooses not to.
Apple’s activity rings on the Watch are a great way to get people to be more active, but once we become more active, Apple is dropping the ball in a lot of respects.
Last edited:
Was always going to be another 'meh' year for the AW.
Next year is the 10th anniversary, I expect all the stops to be pulled out then.
Next year is the 10th anniversary, I expect all the stops to be pulled out then.
A very long article just to say that we will be underwhelmed. Once again. Basically it will he an Apple Watch Series 5ssss
I agree. The aw extreme is comically large. I can see the point for the intended use (extreme sports etc). But people use it to go out and about and it just looks silly and ridiculous.
So then drop the prices by 30% to reflect the lack of what the ultra has. many holes in this story.
Apple is working on future Apple Watch technology for the larger-sized model, and rumors suggest that we're going to see smaller updates for the Series 9 with few new features at the current time.
I am very happy with my Series 4 Stainless steel watch. I don't plan to upgrade for few more years regardless of what new features Apple throws at Apple Watch. I dont use any 3rd party apps, and overall my watch usage is basic - can almost say, I use Apple Watch as a watch to tell time 9 out of 10 times and for that I won't need to upgrade for few more years.
I have a series 4 myself. I will buy the apple watch 9 ..........Sept. ultra is too big and seems to be a waste of money at this time.
I wonder if last year's seemingly lacklustre update to the series 8 was because the ultra Apple Watch got all the R&D time and resources. If we assume the Ultra is on a 2-year upgrade cycle, this could mean more meaningful upgrades for the series 9, but it may also mean no new Ultra either.
Sounds like I continue to use my series 5. I need to get a new battery for it. Any tips on how to get one? I took it to Apple and they were like we will charge you $300 so you might as well get a new watch. This was conflicting with my understanding of their repair website which said it would be like $75 for a new battery…
Our family has a 12/18 S4, 4/20 S5, and 6/21 S6 (replaced my 5/17 S1). The only thing that would get me to upgrade my S6 is:
- Flat glass so I can put on a screen protector
- Glucose sensor
- Temp sensor
- Ultra watch band
- Keep price around $400 or so
A true shame, since the ultra is hideous looking and comically large. One of the ugliest products apple released in the recent past.
This is exactly what I have been wondering! I was thinking that if Apple has been using (roughly) the same chip for years now, wouldn't we be able to squeeze out some better efficiency with a smaller node? I would imagine the R&D that would go into creating a new SOC would be quite a bit and surely wouldn't warrant a yearly chip upgrade. I guess that is why it seems that the chips get upgraded every 3-ish years?
Seems like we are due for a processor update, no?
I have a tough time believing they are just going to do a chip bump and no updates to the Ultra. Apple knows that won’t sell consumers and even with “off” years of the AW and S-Models of the phones, they always bring something.
I’d bet on a dark version of the Ultra and some sort of compelling change for the S9 (flat screen, continuous temp monitoring during day, etc.).
I’d bet on a dark version of the Ultra and some sort of compelling change for the S9 (flat screen, continuous temp monitoring during day, etc.).
I feel like the S5 was significant in adding AOD.
S6 was pretty meh, S7 was a little interesting in the added screen size and rapid charging, but S8 again meh.
Looks like I will be holding onto my badly banged-up-and-scratched (but also still perfectly functional) Series 6 until either it croaks or Apple releases something for the mass consumer market that isn’t another middling iterative update.
Last edited: