It was not that many years ago Boeing was found to be manipulating the new KC tanker contract.
So it was redone
And the won
And then it was discovered it was a lease program, and the DoD/USAF would foot bill to convert to passenger.
and that stupidity was stopped.
And then another run off in KC program with Airbus version.
Then failures in catastrophic testing of first ever Li-ON batteries in a commercial jet.
I worked in McDD, and I saw this crap happening there. Getting worse.
Chalk up another one why they should have bought the MRTT.The Air Force has currently stopped accepting deliveries of their KC-46’s due to finding trash, and power tools left in the airframes upon post delivery inspections. Serious times for Boeing.
Chalk up another one why they should have bought the MRTT.
Together with Northrop Grumman.....and it would have been built in the US as well.
Boeing sells an option to warn when the 2 AoA sensors disagree. Lion did not have it.
You can't even pay to get redundant MCAS.
It seems the warning light that will be made standard cost 80K until now.To me the most serious issue with this other that the fact that it is a remarkably negligent decision as an option is what prompted AA and WN to order it? Did they have have information not widely available at the time of ordering? What made them more aware of the need to correct the standard single sensor error anomaly and it’s effect on MCAS? I also don’t buy the statements that most airlines did not want another warning display on the PFD. Show me a pilot who wants less information when running a list. So much political corruption at Boeing right now. I hope they recover.
C919 and MC-21 EIS are planned for 2021.
It seems the warning light that will be made standard cost 80K.
I read WN ordered the AoA display option as an additional precaution after the Lion Air crash. I don't know how much it will still cost.
That's for the new behavior. It seems the AoA display is not included.It’s a no cost reflash to all existing Max as of the patch release in a few weeks. AA pilots start flying the new software in the sim next week.
That's for the new behavior. It seems the AoA display is not included.
I don't know if the airlines will get a warning light kit to be installed at their own cost.
Yes, but I understand they have to add the light, or is it already installed but optionally functional on all planes?Interesting. I’ll have to double check. My understanding was the AOA disagreement notification was part of the new Patch for MCAS parameters? Thanks.
Yes, but I understand they have to add the light, or is it already installed but optionally functional on all planes?
Yes, it is possibly misreported on the press.My understanding was the AOA disagreement on the PFD and a new warning display on the panel were different. I was under the impression that the new software included the AOA disagreement on the PFD along with the new MCAS parameters. I’m fairly certain the warning display on the panel is not included. I need to look into it further.
Interesting. I’ll have to double check. My understanding was the AOA disagreement notification was part of the new Patch for MCAS parameters? Thanks.
Chalk up another one why they should have bought the MRTT.
It is also a question that the MRTT was basically ready and the US did not need to waste time and money making their own.Should have.
It is embarrassing how blatantly biased the selection processes was.
Sure it is better to buy American, but there are plenty of times when better equipment and aircraft was foreign made.
A single AOA sensor for such a vital system? This is unbelievable for modern aircraft design, which have historically been standards based on redundancy to avoid failures that result in fatalities.
The fact that Boeing kept a single AoA sensor input on the Max reinforces the rush to certification. So disappointed in Boeing.
I posted a link which mentioned one AOA, if I’m not mistaken, which I could be. Triplicate seems to be the norm. Back in the day (1990-2000s), the 747s, we had used 3 inertials for over the pond navigation.Everything I'm seeing says there are two AoA sensors, including the post you responded to.
I posted a link which mentioned one AOA, if I’m not mistaken, which I could be. Triplicate seems to be the norm. Back in the day (1990-2000s), the 747s, we had used 3 inertials for over the pond navigation.
One AOA used by the culprit system, even if there are more on the airplanes.Thank you, now I see the cause for confusion. The 737 does have two AoA sensors.
However, it is not a redundant setup--the two AoA sensors are used for different systems. So if one of the two AoA sensor fails, whichever system uses that particular AoA sensor also fails.
One AOA used by the culprit system, even if there are more on the airplanes.
One AOA used by the culprit system, even if there are more on the airplanes.