The previous S2K eventually faded away due to low sales, yet it was fantastic looking, had ~240 HP stock, stellar seating, awesome shifter, but at mid/upper $30s, I think people are looking for higher performance, or more content, I think it was sort of in a bad (I guess nonexistent) segment, though I wonder how many sales were lost due to it only being available in a manual? (I have no idea about transmission sales ratios for the Miata as a comparison)
I don't have exact numbers for the Miata, but the last I heard it was basically the only car in the American market that sold more manuals than automatics.
To be honest, even though today's automatics generally give you better 0-60 times and better fuel economy(the opposite of 20 years ago) it's still hard for me to stomach this type of car with anything BUT a manual transmission.
I've always found it somewhat amusing that through the 17 year lifespan of the MGB(a car near and dear to my heart, and also allegedly one of the cars Mazda examined extensively for the Miata) it was available for a few years with an automatic but only in the domestic market. North American never officially got an automatic while GB did-that's a bit opposite of how you would expect things . It's even more surprising when you consider that something like 4/5 of the total production came to North America. I've never even seen photos of the automatic version aside from the sketches in the Hayne's book.
I know that safety standards today pretty much dictate a lot of added weight, and by and large I'm happy with things like airbags. Heck, my MG has factory 3-point belts, but I'd love a basic comfort like an inertia reel so that I can get a little bit more mobility when driving . I'm also glad that cars today can get the ride height down to something reasonable and still meet impact standards-something that British Leyland had to get around by basically putting the car on stilts.
The lack of "creature comforts" is somewhat refreshing to me since it makes you focus on driving-which is what these type of cars are meant to do quite well. I don't have a(working) radio to mess with in the MG, the temptation to answer my phone is non existant(I can't hear it ringing or feel it vibrating, and even if I did I likely couldn't hear it), and the climate control basically consists of two knobs that do nothing and a single switch to turn the blower on and off . AC would be nice for the really hot parts of the summer, but the heater does well enough in the winter to keep me warm and putting the top down gives plenty of air movement to keep you cool.
As for the S2000, one thing to keep in mind is that the increased power is somewhat offset by the heavier weight. Also, if it's a typical Honda high performance engine, the big horsepower numbers will come at the cost of low-end torque. I'm not crazy about having to wind an engine out to 3.5K+ to start get a decent amount of torque, but then that's a personal preference. Honda engines can certainly handle doing that all day.