Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Did you opt for an animal cage for the cat/dog or does Dodge not offer one? I've never seen a dealer offer an official one but it seems nearly every dealer has a third party company that operates within and provides cages for animals.

No idea, we don't drive animals around ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: A.Goldberg
No idea, we don't drive animals around ...
I'm wondering why I thought you had two cats and a dog... It's likely (it usually is) that I'm mixing you up for someone else.


So getting back to normalcy, that's a sweet Shelby build but that price is really high.
 
It looks like a typical suv.

Clearly there's enough variation in design, and nuance with execution, that even within the same vehicle class, it's easy to see differences. Do the S2000 and Miata look the same? ;)


If the gray border around the grille was body color, it wouldn’t be so bad.

Yeah, I don't mind the blacked out grill that much, but then they chose to leave those partial, horizontal "fangs" in the body color, they just kind of end, it's a weird visual flow (it's the same problem with some current Toyota/Lexus designs).

Even the new BMW above has a nice updated grill but keeps some traditional design elements like a complete horizontal front section.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn
Isn't the Audi a per-production concept vehicle and the BMW more close to production? I doubt Audi would use a plastic looking grill like that. Maybe a dark chromed plastic. The fake lower intake vents with the narrow slatting for the disc brakes looks chintzy on what I assume will be a 70K+ SUV.

They did such an amazing job with the front end of the A8, for example.
 
Clearly there's enough variation in design, and nuance with execution, that even within the same vehicle class, it's easy to see differences. Do the S2000 and Miata look the same? ;)




Yeah, I don't mind the blacked out grill that much, but then they chose to leave those partial, horizontal "fangs" in the body color, they just kind of end, it's a weird visual flow (it's the same problem with some current Toyota/Lexus designs).

Even the new BMW above has a nice updated grill but keeps some traditional design elements like a complete horizontal front section.
The comment about a typical suv, was not meant to be a compliment for a car maker trying to set themselves apart from the every day product. :)
 
The comment about a typical suv, was not meant to be a compliment for a car maker trying to set themselves apart from the every day product. :)

I think you missed my point. There's of course some common design traits across vehicle classes, SUVs look like SUVs, small roadsters look like small roadsters, trucks look like trucks, sedans look like sedans - but there's enough design variation within a class that should allow for interesting discussion about the details of the execution, without simply dismissing a design as "Just another <insert_vehicle_class>", otherwise, why engage?

Don't ya think?
 
Alright, phase 1 is complete. I've done a lot of this so many times that it's kind of fallen into the "no big deal" category.

Start to finish, this took me about an hour. I guess-as they say-practice makes perfect.

Nice read! Wow, I feel like I could do this now :D
 
Isn't the Audi a per-production concept vehicle and the BMW more close to production? I doubt Audi would use a plastic looking grill like that. Maybe a dark chromed plastic.

They're both production models. I have a feeling the car will look far better IRL, especially in a nice Audi metallic grey or blue.
 
Alright, phase 1 is complete. I've done a lot of this so many times that it's kind of fallen into the "no big deal" category.

First of all, I apologize for the crummy/fuzzy iPhone photos.

As I mentioned, the first step was draining the coolant. In the less than 3 years I've owned the car, I've done 2 full coolant changes and several partial changes, so this time I just brought it down to below the level of the head. I opted not to remove the heater valve or thermostat housing this time-I just disconnected their hoses.

From there, it was time to start taking stuff off.

First, the carburetors come off to leave the bare intake and exhaust manifold.

View attachment 764837

There are 4 1/2" nuts backed by big fender washers that hold both the intake and exhaust in place. One those are removed, the intake manifold pulls straight off.

From the factory, the two ends of the exhaust manifold were also held on with studs. Everyone replaces these with 1/2" head bolts to make the exhaust manifold a lot easier to remove. As long as the engine is to stay in the car, the exhaust manifold just has to be unbolted from the head and not removed completely.

From there, the valve cover came off.

View attachment 764843

The keen-eyed viewer will see an obvious issue here-the oil coating the rockers is "milky" looking. This indicates a breech between the oil and coolant passages, and is a sure sign of a blown head gasket. This obviously happened the last time I drove the car, as I hadn't noticed it previously.

In any case, I skipped photographing a few steps, but the rocker shaft comes off(four nuts for the shaft itself, four that also double as head bolts). Then, the rest of the head studs came out. This is probably bad of me, but I used an impact to zip these off. The pushrods also come out-these just pull out with a small "wiggle" to make sure the tappets don't come out with them.

With the rocker shaft off, the engine can be "bumped" a few times with the starter to use compression and help break the seal between the head and block.

A bit of manhandling later and off it comes.

View attachment 764849

Just to check the valve condition, I put kerosene in each of the combustion chambers, and didn't observe any appreciable leaking.

View attachment 764850

I can then turn my attention to the gasket.

It's difficult to see, but just as I suspected there's a small breech in the fire ring between cylinders 2 and 3.

View attachment 764851

View attachment 764852

I did a bit more clean-up work tonight. I basically just used a paint scraper to clean the loose crud off the head and block, but that's it. I also used a tap to CAREFULLY chase the stud holes in the block and blow them out with compressed air.

The rule of thumb is that factory studs never go bad, but for peace of mind I spent the money on new studs. Unfortunately, there are no-inbetweens on MG head studs-either you re-use the factory studs or you go whole hog and buy racing grade ARP studs at $100+ a set. I'm waiting on those to arrive, but I think that once they're here I'll be ready to button it back up with a new gasket.

Start to finish, this took me about an hour. I guess-as they say-practice makes perfect.
I think you take car tinkering to the next level! An hour to strip an engine? Of course on a modern car it takes that long to take off all the covers to find the engine!
 
I think you take car tinkering to the next level! An hour to strip an engine? Of course on a modern car it takes that long to take off all the covers to find the engine!

Just to get the head off :)

An engine pull takes ~3 hours.

BTW, the new head studs arrived today. I also checked the block and head for flatness(both in spec) so I will HOPEFULLY get it put back together and running this evening.
 
I’m more of a Mustang fan in general, But the new 2018 Shelby Super Snake is horrible from the front. Its like a body kit that doesn’t match the car. That hood does blend with that specific body style, the Grill insert is unattractive, but they were trying to achieve the whole *Wide body* look. It just seems over-emphasized. (In fairness, I don’t like the S550 body style.)

But..it certainly doesn’t lack the performance:
  • 5.0 Supercharged/Over 750 HP
  • 0-60>3.5s.
  • Brembo Six Piston calipers
  • 20” wheels
  • Penske Suspension
  • $114,000

Somewhat related (Throw-back GT500):

This is a historic piece revived for the true GT500 enthusiast. Shelby is building _ten_Limited 1967 GT500 Supersnakes for $250,000 in P.A.

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/classic/shelby-building-ten-glorious-mustang-continuations?amp

http://www.shelby.com/Vehicles/50th67GT500SS.pdf

From article:

“Will be built to order from donor 1967 Mustangs in Pennsylvania, complete with factory VINs and original titles. The cars will be stripped down and rebuilt with new sheet metal, with a four-barrel Holley carburetor atop a 550-horsepower 427 big-block V-8. A Top Loader four-speed manual will sync with the locking differential, but a five-speed or even an automatic transmission are options”.


AE8699EF-7920-42EE-BC33-CA4BFCA2742E.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn
Just to get the head off :)

An engine pull takes ~3 hours.

BTW, the new head studs arrived today. I also checked the block and head for flatness(both in spec) so I will HOPEFULLY get it put back together and running this evening.
Well hope it all goes well and solves the problem.
It looks like the sort of weekend you'll want it on the road.
 
So, a minor MG update for today:

First of all, I took the head to the machine shop over in the physics department at work. At first I thought I was in deep trouble because it rocked on his ground-flat granite table. He suspected it was old head gasket material, though, and pulled out his straight edge. Fortunately, the worst we found would pass a 1 thou feeler gauge but not a 2 thou(the spec is 2 thou), so the head is good. I borrowed his straight edge and checked the block with similar results.

I did a bit of other clean-up work too. When the head was reworked, it was fitted with what are called "umbrella" oil seals on the valve stems. These are considered an improvement over the old O-ring type seals, and do a better job of keeping oil from leaking down the valve stems and into the combustion chamber.

I happened to notice that two of the seals had migrated up off the valve guide and were sitting way up on the valve stem.

IMG_5358.jpg


Fortunately, it only took a bit of work to put them right.

When I got home, the ARP studs were waiting for me, so I'd hoped to get it finished tonight.

IMG_5361.jpg


IMG_5362.jpg


They were even nice enough to include an ARP "Advanced Racing Performance" sticker. I wonder how many horsepower that's good for :)

Unfortunately, I hit a bit of a road block. I have one stud that absolutely stuck in the block and won't budge. I got it nice and cherry red with my MAP/Oxy torch(a handy $60 Lowes investment) but it's still being stubborn-I hit it with PB blaster and will make another attempt tomorrow.

Also, one other thing. I mentioned "chasing" the threads earlier. This is mostly just a way to clean up and reform them-it's a good idea any time you're dealing with a fastener where the torque is critical, but also is good just as a general habit on this type of work.

Basically, you just use a tap that matches the threads already in the hole, and just turn it gently.

Here's a 5/16-16 tap going into the rocker pedestal stud holes

IMG_5360.jpg


If you've ever tapped a hole, you have some reference for if something is "wrong" when you're doing this. I turned the tap wrench with one finger on the handle for the initial pass, and once I did the initial cleaning the tap would thread all the way into the hole by hand.

Contrast that to when(in another car project) I was tapping a 3/16 NPT hole in a 1/2" sheet of aluminum. Pipe threads are the worst to tap as they are tapered, but any hole that big(I used a 9/16" pilot drill) is going to be a pain. In that case, I had the workpiece clamped in a vice and was turning the tap with a crescent wrench. Normally, using anything other than a proper tap wrench is frowned upon, but in that case it was necessary(taps are harder than any known drill bit and consequently quite brittle), and too much side loading can break the tap. The big pipe tap was strong enough to handle side loading in this case. I also used a special high sulfur tap lube, and would only go 1/4 turn at a time before backing out to clean out the swarf. Even so, I still had sweat popping out of my forehead every time I turned it, and managed a good work-out from tapping the hole.
 
32373B6D-FCFB-4E8D-AAFA-F0AFEABC12B0.jpeg


Gratuitous ‘under the hood’ shot just showing how clean this is. Looks like it’s right from the factory. Preparing for C&C, Meet&Greets and two car shows.


(Also, as someone else previously implied, for the S550 owner (s) with the hideous coolant expansion tank, Mishimoto makes a nice aftermarket set up to delete the stock off-colored bulbous tank.:D)
 
Last edited:
BOOM

My wheels and tires shipped early. Will be arriving tomorrow, five days *ahead* of schedule. Awesome customer service.
 
2019 Scat Pack Spy-shot leaked.
037B7537-C947-4CD1-AAA0-3AD8BB51FD32.jpeg


Seems like a rather minor update from the exterior, aside from the dual nostrils that are now embedded inside the grill for the air intake. It’s difficult to say, but the headlamps looks slightly re-designed or reduced. No much is else known about it, but in a way, I like that’s not completely “overhauled” and it’s more minor. I still think the Scat-Pack looks really good and it does have its core differences from the RT in terms of aesthetics and interior.

The Scat pack was the only other alternative I was considering before purchasing the SHO, and two things I like about Dodge is they always have some outstanding color options and even their stock wheels are a nice set up. Being I drive the RT model for work related purposes, I think the redundancy factor worked out for the best that I did not purchase it.
 
Last edited:
Still looking for recommendations for moderately priced, but decent sheep skin seat covers, or good quality synthetic sheep skin covers, I'm not proud. :):)
 
Still looking for recommendations for moderately priced, but decent sheep skin seat covers, or good quality synthetic sheep skin covers, I'm not proud. :):)

My disclaimer is I don’t have any experience with sheep skin covers or the brand I listed below, but I did do some research from Amazon from various offerings and I found some sheepskin covers that are affordably priced with some outstanding reviews. Offered in four colors. Perhaps these might be of interest to you:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0182QTSPG/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_FA5gBb2Z5E0RP
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
My disclaimer is I don’t have any experience with sheep skin covers or the brand I listed below, but I did do some research from Amazon from various offerings and I found some sheepskin covers that are affordably priced with some outstanding reviews. Offered in four colors. Perhaps these might be of interest to you:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0182QTSPG/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_FA5gBb2Z5E0RP
Thanks, I have looked at these. My only concern is that they fit a seat with an integrated headrest.

I bought some at a local auto supply store, but they are kind of rough looking, all matted and partially disclolored, which I’ll be returning. The issue with ordering something like this online is expense of return, although I could return for discoloration, but not for not liking them, at least I don’t think so.
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.