You're 100% wrong. A brand's heritage is its heritage. Your argument is shallow in every sense of the word. You also don't seem to understand the difference between a holding company and an auto manufacturer.Negative. Opel was owned by GM and used GM platforms, so it was largely American, and these models are still sold today.
Volvo is mainly designed in Sweden, but I think they now use Chinese parts too. Some model is made in China (I think exclusively). As it would be, given that it is Chinese-owned.
I won't answer the rest. Your post is an opinion.
[doublepost=1539965985][/doublepost]
Someone said Fiat is not British, which cannot be affirmed 100%.
A brand's nationality is based on where it was founded, not where it moved for tax purposes or who bought them.
For instance, a headline would say "Tata bought British Company Land Rover".
But good job derailing a perfectly good thread with your blithering.
Your homework is to go find out
- What a holding company is
- What automakers provide of value (hint: it's not "Chinese parts". They design, sell, and manufacture cars)
- Where these companies are from.
It DOES NOT matter who OWNS a company. The COMPANY is from WHICHEVER country it started in. It's NOT an opinion. This is FACT.