Well, I am an analytical chemist by training, education, and profession so I guess I have a different outlook on spectroscopy
About 90% of my master's thesis was written based on GC-MS, DSC, and UV-VIS data, and the rest on NMR, GC-FID, IR and TEM(although I didn't get any of my own TEM data-it all came from publications of another group member who trained me in nanoparticle synthesis).
Now, if we want to talk about the infernal, straight from hell HPLC, I'm in full agreement
. While I was at Georgetown(as an undergrad, mind you) we were given a refurbished HP 1050 HPLC system. Somehow or another, I fell into the position of being the only person in the department who knew how to operate it, maintain it, and troubleshoot it. We had a professor emeritus who was trying to separate a pair of diasteriomers for his research(he synthesized anticonvulsants). I spent about an hour on the phone with Varian(RIP) specing a column for the separation. We ended up with a 35cm, 3µM packing column. When we ordered it, I was dreading actually getting the thing to work, and I ended up having to run it at crazy low flow rates to keep the back pressure manageable(our pump would complain at 4,000 PSI and shut off at 6,000). I had to switch the entire system over to acetonitrile/water(right in the middle of the worldwide acetonitrile shortage that came from the 2008 Beijing Olympics) because methanol/water mixtures have weirdly high viscosities at typical HPLC ratios that contribute to higher back pressures. I
finally got a working method, but it took me about a month. Even with a more normal 15cm 5µM column, I was still constantly fighting leaks and back pressure issues.
I spent about a half an hour typing an email to a student last night explaining NMR spectral interpretation-apparently either his TA didn't do a good job of explaining it or the student just didn't understand it the way it was explained. I ended my email, though, by virtually begging the student to come in and meet with me on Monday as it's so much easier to explain it when I can write/draw on spectra and give examples on paper.
Speaking of NMR also, Agilent(formerly the HP scientific instrument division) bought out Varian about 4 years ago. I'm a big fan of Agilent for chromatography stuff, but liked the competition that came from Varian and also generally preferred Varian for consumables. Varian had a
very strong history in the NMR market(we have two in-service Varian magnets in our department along with a Varian spectrometer on an Oxford magnet. We also have an old, out of service 300mhz Varian magnet and a wide-bore 500mhz Varian magnet on a spectrometer that one of the professors in the department built. At Georgetown College, we had a 90mhz Varian permanent magnet from the 1960s with a modern Anasazi FT-NMR spectrometer.
I was under the impression that Agilent had bought Varian primarily to get the NMR business(where Agilent had no presence) but about a year ago they decided to completely kill off the NMR division. They are honoring existing service contracts, but not renewing them, and also not developing the vNMRj software package. That leaves us sort of up a creek as we quite literally have over a million dollars in Varian NMR equipment that's about 6 years old and is effectively EOL, although I know we're not the only ones in that position. I think JEOL or Bruker will be getting our business in the future for NMR, and if I have any part in our next GC-MS it will probably be Shimadzu.