Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

Weaselboy

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 23, 2005
34,481
16,195
California
How did you check it? It should download and apply updates once in 24 hours.
I just checked settings on my iPad and AG shows "last checked" on Feb. 14 then as soon as I opened the settings page it started swirling and updated to a release from today. I have not noticed on both the iPad and iPhone.
 

avatar-adg

macrumors 6502
May 15, 2015
282
241
Moscow
I just checked settings on my iPad and AG shows "last checked" on Feb. 14 then as soon as I opened the settings page it started swirling and updated to a release from today. I have not noticed on both the iPad and iPhone.

Argh, that bug is irritating.

Could you please send a log file to us?

To do this:
1. Send a message to support through the app
2. You'll see the log file attached to the message, don't remove it:)
3. PM me the ticket ID you'll get in autoreply
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weaselboy

Weaselboy

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 23, 2005
34,481
16,195
California
Argh, that bug is irritating.

Could you please send a log file to us?

To do this:
1. Send a message to support through the app
2. You'll see the log file attached to the message, don't remove it:)
3. PM me the ticket ID you'll get in autoreply
Done and PM sent. Thanks for the follow up.
 

avatar-adg

macrumors 6502
May 15, 2015
282
241
Moscow
Done and PM sent. Thanks for the follow up.

It seems that background updates aren't allowed for Adguard, please check the settings.

General recommendations:
1) In system settings, background updates should be allowed for Adguard (General-> Background App Refresh).
2) You should not swipe Adguard from the list of recent/launched apps. I'd like to emphasize that this behaviour is not unique for Adguard, but rather dictated by iOS.
3) iPhone/iPad is connected to WiFi when the update is scheduled.
 

Weaselboy

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 23, 2005
34,481
16,195
California
It seems that background updates aren't allowed for Adguard, please check the settings.

General recommendations:
1) In system settings, background updates should be allowed for Adguard (General-> Background App Refresh).
2) You should not swipe Adguard from the list of recent/launched apps. I'd like to emphasize that this behaviour is not unique for Adguard, but rather dictated by iOS.
3) iPhone/iPad is connected to WiFi when the update is scheduled.

Well, I'm a big dummy. I had that disabled. Sorry for the wild goose chase and thanks for the help.
 

Anonymous123

macrumors regular
Jul 22, 2009
103
295
It seems that background updates aren't allowed for Adguard, please check the settings.

General recommendations:
1) In system settings, background updates should be allowed for Adguard (General-> Background App Refresh).
2) You should not swipe Adguard from the list of recent/launched apps. I'd like to emphasize that this behaviour is not unique for Adguard, but rather dictated by iOS.
3) iPhone/iPad is connected to WiFi when the update is scheduled.

I meet all this criteria and Adguard still doesn't update in the background over WiFi. I just opened the app and it said last checked 2/22/16.
 

MrNomNoms

macrumors 65816
Jan 25, 2011
1,159
296
Wellington, New Zealand
The one thing that keeps me with Ad Blocker Plus is the white list functionality - is there a adblocker that uses the content blocker but has the ability to add websites to a whitelist?
 

Anonymous123

macrumors regular
Jul 22, 2009
103
295
The one thing that keeps me with Ad Blocker Plus is the white list functionality - is there a adblocker that uses the content blocker but has the ability to add websites to a whitelist?

Adguard uses the latest content blocker API and has the ability to add websites to a whitelist. It's been a while since I've used Adblock Plus but I found Adguard to be faster and more effective when I made the switch to it.
 

MacGekko

macrumors 6502a
Mar 6, 2009
761
277
There's nothing wrong with ublock (non-origin). Just pick the right lists an go. ;)

(I prefer using Wipr right now until the Purify App developer comes of his ass and releases the "promised" OS X content blocker. But it doesn't generate any revenue so, it could understandably take him a bit.)

Ublock: What lists do you recommend checking?
 

flowsy

macrumors 6502
Aug 16, 2009
356
299
Germany
Ublock: What lists do you recommend checking?

These are the lists I used to use with ublock. Some sites may break, but it didn't happen too often. YMMV. Bildschirmfoto 2016-03-13 um 13.58.01.png

Right now I'm using the new Adguard extension with almost exactly the same lists. But it only can handle 50000 entries (Safari restriction). It's a lesser burden on my old 2011 MBA with 4GB RAM while having 50+ tabs open.
 

MacGekko

macrumors 6502a
Mar 6, 2009
761
277
These are the lists I used to use with ublock. Some sites may break, but it didn't happen too often. YMMV. View attachment 620908

Right now I'm using the new Adguard extension with almost exactly the same lists. But it only can handle 50000 entries (Safari restriction). It's a lesser burden on my old 2011 MBA with 4GB RAM while having 50+ tabs open.


Thank you, Adguard? Do you mean Adguard Adblocker? Right now I am using ClicktoPlugin and the original Adblock, it works great but at times the 2015 Macbook Pro gets hot and it is not because I am playing any video, just that I have many tabs open but I can't figure out which website is causing this, could it be Adblock? What are the advantages of using Ublock or Adguard over Adblock?
 

flowsy

macrumors 6502
Aug 16, 2009
356
299
Germany
It sure could be Adblock. You should definitely try out Ublock and have a better experience than with Adblock. I personally don't trust Adblock anymore. And if you're on Yosemite you should check out Adguard as well. It's a content blocker and (in ways that were explained here before) more effective and resource friendly than the old Safari extensions. And to my knowledge it's the only one right now that is at least somehow customizable (whitelist, etc.).

Edit:
Btw. You mentioned you're using click2plugin, so I guess you are still having the Adobe Flash plugin installed. Flash hasn't been a good experience for me (and a lot of others) and I got rid of the plugin a long time ago. You should try living without it, especially for security reasons. There are only a few sites left that require Adobe Flash installed and if that's the case, Google Chrome is a good fallback option to browse these sites. Uninstall the Flash Plugin and try browsing without it for a few days. I'm pretty sure you're not going to miss it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Weaselboy

MacGekko

macrumors 6502a
Mar 6, 2009
761
277
It sure could be Adblock. You should definitely try out Ublock and have a better experience than with Adblock. I personally don't trust Adblock anymore. And if you're on Yosemite you should check out Adguard as well. It's a content blocker and (in ways that were explained here before) more effective and resource friendly than the old Safari extensions. And to my knowledge it's the only one right now that is at least somehow customizable (whitelist, etc.).

Edit:
Btw. You mentioned you're using click2plugin, so I guess you are still having the Adobe Flash plugin installed. Flash hasn't been a good experience for me (and a lot of others) and I got rid of the plugin a long time ago. You should try living without it, especially for security reasons. There are only a few sites left that require Adobe Flash installed and if that's the case, Google Chrome is a good fallback option to browse these sites. Uninstall the Flash Plugin and try browsing without it for a few days. I'm pretty sure you're not going to miss it.



I don't have Flash on Safari, I only utilize Flash as a last resort with Chrome as some of the music streaming sites require it but I thought clicktoplugin blocks all plug ins which is why I still use it.
 

xxfury2xx

macrumors member
Mar 27, 2009
34
0
Sorry to go off-topic, but could any of you recommend a good cookie blocker? I'm currently contemplating a switch from Firefox to Safari and one my most loved Firefox plug-ins is Self Destructing Cookies. If I could find an extension that can replicate this plug-in then I think I can finally make the full time switch to Safari. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
 

Weaselboy

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 23, 2005
34,481
16,195
California
Sorry to go off-topic, but could any of you recommend a good cookie blocker? I'm currently contemplating a switch from Firefox to Safari and one my most loved Firefox plug-ins is Self Destructing Cookies. If I could find an extension that can replicate this plug-in then I think I can finally make the full time switch to Safari. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
I use an app called Cookie. I'm on mobile so don't have a link for you. If you can't find it shoot me a pm. It is in the App Store.

Edit: link
 
Last edited:

tazdevl

macrumors regular
Jul 6, 2010
231
145
@avatar-adg

Why does Adguard need to remain open in the background and cannot be closed via the app switcher? Nearly every other ad blocker can work unopened with safari running.
 

avatar-adg

macrumors 6502
May 15, 2015
282
241
Moscow
Why does Adguard need to remain open in the background and cannot be closed via the app switcher? Nearly every other ad blocker can work unopened with safari running.

Hi! Sorry, didn't get the question, what do you mean? Are you talking about AG browser extension?
 

rnbwd

macrumors regular
Jul 6, 2015
111
38
Seattle
Nope and Ka-Block are open source and pretty decent. Nope is interesting b/c it's a dynamic content-blocker using the new API, disconnect's list - with the open source code for how it's translated it into safari's filter engine and also how to change the filters dynamically while safari is running.

Adguard is impressive.
 

dammerl

macrumors regular
Jun 29, 2012
139
43
Europe
I just compared the filters of some (Safari Desktop) content blockers and found out that the filters.json files of Ka-Block 2.5 and Adamant 1.3 (both downloaded from the Gallery) are 100% identical.

So, Adamant is just “rebranding” the open source filter from Ka-Block?
 

ledzep1

macrumors 6502
Jan 24, 2016
283
100
Hi

Im using latest El Capitan and the Adguard extension for Safari.

I have noticed on a few websites that Adguard protection is off, these websites are not in any whitelist I have created so I'm not sure why this is the case.

Can someone explain this please.

Thanks very much
 

Weaselboy

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 23, 2005
34,481
16,195
California
Hi

Im using latest El Capitan and the Adguard extension for Safari.

I have noticed on a few websites that Adguard protection is off, these websites are not in any whitelist I have created so I'm not sure why this is the case.

Can someone explain this please.

Thanks very much
I have never noticed that on any site. Can you tell us the sites so others can test for you?

Could it be the "Acceptable Ads" AdGuard allows that you are seeing?
 

retroneo

macrumors 6502a
Apr 22, 2005
778
153
I have noticed on a few websites that Adguard protection is off, these websites are not in any whitelist I have created so I'm not sure why this is the case.

Me too. I'm finding Adguard now blocks zero ads on most sites.

Adguard 2.2.3
Safari 9.1

Adguard isn't paused.
Acceptable ads are off.
Filters updated April 14th.
 

Weaselboy

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 23, 2005
34,481
16,195
California
Me too. I'm finding Adguard now blocks zero ads on most sites.

Adguard 2.2.3
Safari 9.1

Adguard isn't paused.
Acceptable ads are off.
Filters updated April 14th.
I have the same settings as you and I'm just not seeing any difference. Can you give us a couple sites as an example. I just went to CNN, Cnet, and Drudge and checked with AG paused and paused and it seems to be working normally every site I visit.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.