Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

DJTaurus

macrumors 68000
Jan 31, 2012
1,772
1,386
Its not only Crystals issue on blocking ign's videos... same goes for Purify.... just tested it.
 

Charliebird

macrumors 6502a
Mar 10, 2010
849
110
I've been researching ad blockers and I understand the dilemma between ads being intrusive with privacy concerns and supporting content providers which are primarily funded by ads. I would like to support content providers by allowing a reasonable number of ethical ads to appear however I would like to filter out the really bad stuff. Do any of the existing content blockers meet this requirements?
 

Apple_Robert

Contributor
Sep 21, 2012
35,668
52,491
In a van down by the river
I've been researching ad blockers and I understand the dilemma between ads being intrusive with privacy concerns and supporting content providers which are primarily funded by ads. I would like to support content providers by allowing a reasonable number of ethical ads to appear however I would like to filter out the really bad stuff. Do any of the existing content blockers meet this requirements?
At this point in time, I am not aware of any blocker that allows Whitelisting with the ability to control what does or doesn't get blocked on a Whitelisted site.
 

Rigby

macrumors 603
Aug 5, 2008
6,257
10,215
San Jose, CA
At this point in time, I am not aware of any blocker that allows Whitelisting with the ability to control what does or doesn't get blocked on a Whitelisted site.
The reason for that is a technical limitation of the current content blocker API. Whitelisting as some of the extensions do it today is easy to implement using "ignore-previous-rules" actions. But, as the name implies, they cause Safari to ignore *all* previously encountered blocking rules. So it isn't easily possible to whitelist individual domains without also disabling other blocking rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charliebird

WordsmithMR

macrumors 6502
Mar 17, 2015
370
457
Murica
Technically, the ad networks don't suffer, because each impression that is denied by an ad-blocker is an impression that is not paid out as cash to the website.

So who we are really punishing with our actions are the publishers, who earn less in ad revenue. It hurts, I know, but I hope this will incentivise them to put us readers first and foremost when designing their websites. My iPhone 5s' browser should not have to freeze on the front page of TheVerge and leave me unable to scroll while a giant beer ad spins lazily in front of me.
The ad networks suffer. A tad bit less than the content producers, but they're suffering. What do you suppose happens when the networks aren't producing enough clicks to generate sales? They lose money just as well... They also lose companies who won't waste money in producing content to market via these ad networks. Only whitelist free sites that you want to support, like MacRumors :)
 

JackieInCo

Suspended
Jul 18, 2013
5,178
1,601
Colorado
The ad networks suffer. A tad bit less than the content producers, but they're suffering. What do you suppose happens when the networks aren't producing enough clicks to generate sales? They lose money just as well... They also lose companies who won't waste money in producing content to market via these ad networks. Only whitelist free sites that you want to support, like MacRumors :)
I don't whitelist anyone. I block all ads on all sites.

I don't even have ads on any of the websites that I personally run.
 

0970373

Suspended
Mar 15, 2008
2,727
1,412
I've been researching ad blockers and I understand the dilemma between ads being intrusive with privacy concerns and supporting content providers which are primarily funded by ads. I would like to support content providers by allowing a reasonable number of ethical ads to appear however I would like to filter out the really bad stuff. Do any of the existing content blockers meet this requirements?

Yeah, I don't mind ads so much as the trackers etc collecting data and sending it back to SkyNet. Though I guess they are intertwined at this point.
 

WordsmithMR

macrumors 6502
Mar 17, 2015
370
457
Murica
I don't whitelist anyone. I block all ads on all sites.

I don't even have ads on any of the websites that I personally run.
Well that is great that you can afford to maintain your sites ad free. I hope to one day be on your level. I do not see the harm of supporting a handful of sites that provide me free content... However there are some exceptions to sites that are just cringe worthy and I do not want them making a penny. >:[
 

JackieInCo

Suspended
Jul 18, 2013
5,178
1,601
Colorado
Well that is great that you can afford to maintain your sites ad free. I hope to one day be on your level. I do not see the harm of supporting a handful of sites that provide me free content... However there are some exceptions to sites that are just cringe worthy and I do not want them making a penny. >:[
Agreed. I read an article on the Washington Post site a few days ago and AB+ blocked 22 ads on that one page. Ridiculous.
 

827538

Cancelled
Jul 3, 2013
2,322
2,833
I've read the first and last (28) pages on this.

Could someone fill in a few questions I have? I use ABP on my desktop and love it, is there something similar for safari on iOS?
Do I need this running as a background app or is it an extension? Or do I just need to run it once?

I have a scorched earth policy with ads and data mining. If they hadn't been so aggressive and intrusive I wouldn't have minded Now unless you are paying me to view ads I won't view them, and my data is mine, if you want it, pay me for it.
 

hank moody

macrumors 6502a
Jan 18, 2015
722
351
I've read the first and last (28) pages on this.

Could someone fill in a few questions I have? I use ABP on my desktop and love it, is there something similar for safari on iOS?
Do I need this running as a background app or is it an extension? Or do I just need to run it once?

I have a scorched earth policy with ads and data mining. If they hadn't been so aggressive and intrusive I wouldn't have minded Now unless you are paying me to view ads I won't view them, and my data is mine, if you want it, pay me for it.

unistall ABP. it is sh*t.

install uBlock Origin in your PC/MAC.
install Purify in iOS.

No you don't need to run it in background. iOS does all the work.
 

Apple_Robert

Contributor
Sep 21, 2012
35,668
52,491
In a van down by the river
In my opinion, some members here need to get together, and create a content blocker (maybe call it MacSmack re: smacking ads down). I am not a coder but, I would be willing to help in any way I can with testing, layout and feature suggestions etc.
 

Warbrain

macrumors 603
Jun 28, 2004
5,702
293
Chicago, IL
I've never seen MSNBC do this. Don't know about Fox sports or Sky.
Just tested MSNBC again and videos play fine with Adblock Plus. Tested Fox Sports and I was able to play a video as well.

Considering Adblock Plus will negotiate with sites and get paid to not block some ads, I bet this has happened with them.
 

827538

Cancelled
Jul 3, 2013
2,322
2,833
unistall ABP. it is sh*t.

install uBlock Origin in your PC/MAC.
install Purify in iOS.

No you don't need to run it in background. iOS does all the work.

Just bought and used Crystal, really happy with it. Been long overdue for iOS to get adblocking get in Safari. Some sites were becoming unreadable.

Tried uBlock over ABP, didn't like it, didn't feel any faster and loaded sites weirdly compared to ABP.
Is there any lists I should be using to better cover my privacy as I tend to prefer to avoid Ghostery?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.