More options would be great but there's not a single website I encountered problems with Adblock Fast. It doesn't matter if the developer respond in real time if you have to contact him all the time to fix websites.
I'm not judging devs nor Crystal developer. I think the deal is fair since it's an OPTIONAL whitelist.
And I don't think it's bad to support developers. I buy plenty of apps and donate when the app is free.
Here Adblock Fast doesn't block sponsored ads on ebaumsworld and it doesn't block a banner ad on Huffington Post. I'm sure there are other sites it doesn't do well on. The point is, no ad blocker does it all perfectly. Not even the free ones. You need developers to be responsive, because the day your choice starts failing you won't be thinking it doesn't matter that the developer responds.
I believe options are needed in ad blocking apps, because there is just no way to render each individual site perfectly. Just my opinion. If Adblock Fast is working for you in every aspect, then that's the app for you. To me, there are many other good ones with many more options to implement.
Sent a email to the Silentium developer last night about the app, and a reply was waiting for me when I woke. That's how it gets done, folks. Attention to customer details.
That's what we want out of all these developers. It's the only way content blocking can be improved. There's no one perfect rule set or app. It comes down to who will act on a screenshot or website you send in for adjustment.