No, that is not what I said.
You're right. What you said was that they should only provide basic apps. Still a crap idea, because some people don't want to use third party apps and still want a good experience.
No, that is not what I said.
You're right. What you said was that they should only provide basic apps. Still a crap idea, because some people don't want to use third party apps and still want a good experience.
There was streaming music before Apple Music. There was a VoIP client before FaceTime. Podcasts? Developers are doing it. So according to your logic, we might as well gut default apps and just throw third party ones on there.
No, that is still not what I said. I’ll elaborate. I see iMessage in iOS 10 as a clear departure from what Apple did before. All other apps target a certain baseline functionality, basically the essentials of what the apps are supposed to do. Podcasts is for subscribing and listening to podcasts, nothing fancy. Music is for organising and listening to music, optional Apple Music is included for subscribers. iMessage, on the other hand, goes way beyond what a decent messaging app needs. They go over the top with fancies and are cramming a lot of functionality into it that is clearly targeted at a particular market, namely that what Snapchat, Facebook Messenger and others are doing. Instead of providing a good baseline experience for all of their users, they get carried away by their desire to compete in a particular market directly. In addition, they encourage developers to embed mini-apps into Messages directly, so that users can do stuff that they would normally do in dedicated non-messaging apps. Messages is becoming an app platform itself, instead of a messaging app. I believe that this is not what Apple should be doing.
Some might prefer that
If apple presents a better value proposition than the 3rd party apps then more power to them. For me all the new messenger stuff isn't a better experience, te a me-too experience.
I like some "expressive options" to a point, but throwing confetti all over whenever anyone types congratulations just tips over into obnoxious. Imagine typing "I heard a loud boom!" to describe when your roof collapsed and having fireworks go off. Now that word is reserved just for describing excitement. I know it's a fringe example, but I don't like the precedent of an algorithm embellishing the meaning of your words.
Good thing I'm still on iOS 7 with no plans to update =)
Then don't use it and try to get the people you iMessage to not use it. Simple, right?
I like some "expressive options" to a point, but throwing confetti all over whenever anyone types congratulations just tips over into obnoxious. Imagine typing "I heard a loud boom!" to describe when your roof collapsed and having fireworks go off. Now that word is reserved just for describing excitement. I know it's a fringe example, but I don't like the precedent of an algorithm embellishing the meaning of your words.
Actually, "Happy Birthday " automatically triggers the balloons and "Congratulations " automatically triggers the confetti .The full screen effects do not happen automatically. They must be chosen specifically per message.
Actually, "Happy Birthday " automatically triggers the balloons and "Congratulations " automatically triggers the confetti .
Did you try typing them? Who said anything about handwriting?Nope, not with this either. Tried it with two different models. Only the handwriting animation. No confetti. No balloons.
Nice!Apple already thought of a way to make sure you don't have to use anything in the new iMessage. I even took a screenshot to help out.
View attachment 636743
All what buttons? Essentially the same ones that are there now?Oh yeah cause you can install iOS 10 and remove all the buttons that are in iMessagenow?
Wow. I'm big enough to admit when I'm wrong. I thought this was regarding the new handwritten texts. I can see why some might find that annoying. Hopefully Apple will realize that there being a bit overzealous here and change it to being optional.
That said, I still don't think it's worth all the anger, especially when there are so many text options available
Definitely not sky is falling bad, but enough to debate it on a forum
I'm just not a fan conceptually of a system that auto-embellishes your words with animation that may or may not reflect how you want to present yourself.
But I'm also pretty confident that today's "it's fun and expressive you old grouch" will be tomorrow's "dear god get rid of that felt and leather skumorphism!" so I'll just bide my time.
I can almost picture the Jony Ive product video where he describes distilling messaging to its core essence and everything is replaced with simple glyphs that convey all meaning. "We call it apple text, and youre going to love it."
In my opinion, Apple is trying to make iMessage such that it is more appealing and interactive to a larger segment of customers, (and potential customers) instead of sticking with the desires of the 'get off my lawn you kids' segment of users.iMessage is becoming less and less interesting for me, don't like the direction they're taking with this new imessage, seems like another messenger for teens.
Imo, a good messaging app should support multiple platforms because not anyone can afford or want an iphone. So yes whatsapp will still be my main messenger.
iMessage is still iMessage that it used to be -- a messaging service that is useful between Apple users and devices -- nothing really about that has changed. Not sure what about that could become "less and less interesting". Are phone calls becoming less and less interesting, or emails becoming less and less interesting? They are just services and basically utilities these days.iMessage is becoming less and less interesting for me, don't like the direction they're taking with this new imessage, seems like another messenger for teens.
Imo, a good messaging app should support multiple platforms because not anyone can afford or want an iphone. So yes whatsapp will still be my main messenger.
Everything added to iMessage would be so appealing to me if I was a teenage girl. As a grown man, i hate all of it.
Same here. The demo during the keynote didn't really wow me at all. Now that I've used them. I've become a fan, especially for the in-line camera and handwriting. I'm pretty sure I'll use the bubble effects a bit as well. Not so much so for the screen effects, but I have teens, so I'll probably get themSo don't use them.
As a grown man who's probably been married longer than many of these complainers have been alive, I look forward to some of the increased interaction my wife and I can text while I'm away on business trips, or the ways my university aged kids will use it with me.
This thread is full of grumps, sheesh.