Yikes, is that what they sell for? I would have gone with a Mac Pro for a few hundred more.
Completely agree
Ridiculous price for what you get. I don't see the Mini lasting to much longer.
Yikes, is that what they sell for? I would have gone with a Mac Pro for a few hundred more.
Completely agree
Ridiculous price for what you get. I don't see the Mini lasting to much longer.
Ridiculous price for what you get. I don't see the Mini lasting to much longer.
"There's a sucker born every minute" - Tim Cook
And in this dystopian future, we will all forget how to tinker and create. Instead we can endlessly download apps in our walled garden app store and tweet each other funny Internet videos.
Of course, I am being bombastic. But it is crazy that the more walled Apple gets, the more people seem to love it. Where are the Woz and Jobs era innovators who liked to break and build? I guess over on *nix and Windows PCs, now that MSFT seems to be reversing course some on the walled garden attempts at W8.
Suffice it to say, I really hope you are wrong.
The Mac Mini is an entry level computer for users just getting in to the Mac system and who already have a monitor and keyboard. It will never be what it was and what it is is what it will be. Want quad, get a iMac or Pro.
I went from a mid 2010 Mini to a maxed out late 2014 Mini and I am very happy with this new machine with 1TB SSD and 16GB ram. True, I'm not a gamer, but if I were a gamer I would not be messing around with a Mini anyway.
It is what it is, and it will never be what it was. Get over it guys.
"There's a sucker born every minute" - Tim Cook
Time was, a generation or so ago, that computers were the domain of IT professionals and geeks. They are still around building, tinkering and creating doing a bit more than swapping out one RAM stick for another, and replacing a HDD with a SSD.
Nowadays PC's are ubiquitous. All offices and most homes have a computer or two or more. Most people buy them to do things, not to tinker with, install drivers, debug software and so on. Most don't want the hassle.
Now anybody can use a computer, to a greater or lesser extent, for their own purposes. The original Mac was a big step in that direction.
The Mini was originally promoted as an entry into the Mac system. For some it still is, but it it has become more than that. For many a suitably specced mini is all the computer they need is all the computer they need .. It fills a niche.
The 2005 Mini was my first computer because I wanted something that was occasionally transportable (on a bicycle or motorcycle), but didn't want a delicate portable to tote from home to class or office, to cafe or park. I didn't want an all in one with a glossy screen. I had no need of a honking great high specced box more suited to creative pros and gamers. Just something to keep create documents, and keep records for work, and for digital photography, music, communications and so on away from work. And I didn't want the hassles that came with Windows.
When replacement became more cost effective than repair or upgrading, my needs were unchanged, though tech had moved on a bit one way and another. My second computer was a Mac Mini. When the time comes my next will almost certainly be a new Mac Mini, which is almost certainly coming.
Yeah, like people ranting and whinging here that Apple isn't producing a Mac Mini tailored to their specific dreams and means.
Why so superior sounding and judgmental about the purchasing decisions of the hoi polloi?
Out of the box a Mac Mini comes with an OS and productivity apps to do things straight away. Updates come free of charge, and generally hassle free. Cheap at the price, I reckon. Who gives a a hoot about your cynical point of view?
Move on.
OK, I get it. Everything Apple does is peachy-keen and groovy. That is why I own four 2012 models, three of which were purchased in 2014!
I largely agree, but my biggest issue is actually the lack of SSD options on the base model and overall available capacity. Apple is definitely not following the trends there. If you want a pure SSD experience, you have to go up to the US$900 model. If you want 512GB SSD, then it's $1,300! They specifically did this to up-sell.This time, sure they have upset a few geeks by bringing out an updated, 2014 Mini, without a big increase in computing performance, and dropping the quad core. However it does come with improvements in other areas. especially connectivity, which are relevant for the day to day use of many.
Meanwhile SSD is the "new" RAM when it comes to Apple prices... they are just gouging customers on this, marking up SSDs 2-3 fold compared to retail. In the old days, it was easy to get around Apple RAM prices (which are relatively reasonable these days) by buying 3rd-party. Now you can't do that on the RAM or the SSD (well, maybe technically the SSD is possible, but I don't buy new Apple products to rip them apart and deal with the various DIY issues that keep these forums busy).
With a desktop computer it's easy to add an *external* SSD and get around the Apple Tax. Can't do that with RAM, which IMHO is still gouging. Apple charges $100 per 4GB. Crucial.com RAM is $40 per 4GB, or 2.5 times retail.
FYI gouging on memory is a industry tradition. I could site examples of this from HP, DEC, and Tektronix in the early 1970's and know of a similar "gouge" on a hardware upgrade by IBM in the 1960's.
I can't see a new Mac Mini right on the heels of the baby upgrade they just did. Maybe 1/2 year from now.
The only problem with an external SSD is it doesn't utilize Apples trim utility but most SSDs now come with good garbage collection that runs during idle time so it's not that big of deal any longer.
Is it here yet?
I largely agree, but my biggest issue is actually the lack of SSD options on the base model and overall available capacity. Apple is definitely not following the trends there. If you want a pure SSD experience, you have to go up to the US$900 model. If you want 512GB SSD, then it's $1,300! They specifically did this to up-sell.
Meanwhile SSD is the "new" RAM when it comes to Apple prices... they are just gouging customers on this, marking up SSDs 2-3 fold compared to retail. In the old days, it was easy to get around Apple RAM prices (which are relatively reasonable these days) by buying 3rd-party. Now you can't do that on the RAM or the SSD (well, maybe technically the SSD is possible, but I don't buy new Apple products to rip them apart and deal with the various DIY issues that keep these forums busy).
In 2014 ..?
Why would I want to do that? I just bought a brand new Mac Mini, and now I would have to have a "permanently" attached external drive hanging off of it?With a desktop computer it's easy to add an *external* SSD and get around the Apple Tax.
I agree, the RAM prices are still silly, but as someone who has been buying computers for 30 years from Apple, Dell, HP, etc., the prices just seem relatively a little less silly then they used to. And I wasn't singling out Apple - yes, it's an industry thing on both the RAM and the SSD price gouging.Can't do that with RAM, which IMHO is still gouging. Apple charges $100 per 4GB. Crucial.com RAM is $40 per 4GB, or 2.5 times retail.
FYI gouging on memory is a industry tradition. I could site examples of this from HP, DEC, and Tektronix in the early 1970's and know of a similar "gouge" on a hardware upgrade by IBM in the 1960's.
In the Apple Store on 12/31 asking about 4K display from the Mac Mini. The kids said it was not available yet, even though I knew it should be possible with the Iris Graphics chips ... and now looking at the Apple Mac Mini specs online it does say "Support for 3840-by-2160 resolution at 30Hz" and "Support for 4096-by-2160 resolution at 24Hz" through the HDMI port only.
Why no 4K video through the Thunderbolt/Display port is a mystery. Anyone got an answer?
IMOP: Maybe Apple will have to have 4K out of Thunderbolt on a small foot print cpu "real soon now", or the Winders' world will.
Anyway, when and if is the question for us. Gotta have it.
No, in 2014 we got another old Mac mini. We are talking about the new Mac mini.
The Broadwell CPUs announced today by Intel include 28W parts (for example the 5557U) which would be suitable for a 2015 Mac mini. These are all dual-core CPUs, but of course faster than the Haswell CPUs found the current mini, particularly faster graphics performance.
Does anybody lament the loss of floppy disc or optical disc ports?