Random question for you Mac mini fans. Do you think the current M2 Pro mini is reasonable value?
I was thinking about it the other day. For £1,400 you get 16GB RAM and a 512GB SSD which is pretty shocking imo. I worry if theydecide to increase it to say £1500 for the M4 Pro version.
Doubt that like for like price increases are on the cards, M4 Pro may get 18Gb native RAM which they won't call an upgrade. If M4 gets 16Gb as standard though there may have to be a commensurate spec bump for the M4 Pro mini as the gap will shrink - 16Gb RAM and 512 SSD as base spec for a Pro would be likely fine if the M4 starts at 16/256 with a 512 'upgraded' SKU. The price difference between M4 Pro and M4 will then become obvious on model comparison on the Apple website - would they want that to happen?
The M4 Pro to come with 18/512 would then be a logical step up but comparisons could then be drawn if an off the shelf 16/512 M4 could be purchased at an Apple Store.
An 18/1Tb SKU would likely add $400 to the Pro price which is surely too much and might need an M4 Max Studio SKU to come with 1Tb SSD too (raising that price as well).
Pound for pound though, if I were in the market for a desktop I'd have jumped on board at Costco £1299 for base M1 Max Mac Studio (instead of a similarly priced M2 pro mini) a few months ago. That offer was repeated several times over the last few months before stocks ran out.
I would say that there's a decent chance that Costco might repeat that for the M2 Max Studio up against the new M4 Pro Mac mini. The M3 Max does at least have hardware AV1 decoding/encoding though and you can expect the M4 Pro to have some ray tracing in the GPU so a direct comparison will likely be harder to square off, especially if certain use cases support the hardware accelerated features of the M4 class CPUs.
On topic reply though, the M2 Pro CPU is quite the increase over an upgraded M2 Mini (additional £350 extra after adding 16Gb RAM to the middle SKU M2) but on the basis that adding BTO/CTO to Macs is increasingly bad value, I'd tend towards trying to get the base SKU that suits you with fewest upgrades - hence the remaindered M1 Max Mac Studio I mentioned previously. It has double the number of encoders, twice the RAM, and 6 Thunderbolt ports instead of 2 or 4. Yes it's an older CPU so you lose out on single core performance and likely some GPU and a year of software support but I would be looking at performance per £ too.
Street price of the standard SKU M2 pro mini hovered around £1250 if I recall, this is the benefit of having a standard SKU which you can find at a third party retailer rather than being stuck with having to purchase upgrades from Apple for a spec you didn't want in its original state.
At the time, therefore, the choice for me would have been between M1 Max Mac Studio 32/512 at a Costco street sale price of £1299, vs a street price of £1250 from various other retailers for the M2 Pro Mac mini 16/512.
If M4 Pro Mac Nano 18/512 comes to £1399 list from Apple I'd be looking later on down the line for discounts from third party retailers - remember that the saving can be put towards AppleCare+. And I'd also be preparing a performance/use case comparison in case if Costco sell an M2 Max Mac Studio 32/512 for £1299 sometime next year.
The things I would be comparing would be:
Single Core/Multicore Bench
Video decoding/encoding performance (with AV1 hardware on M4 vs none on M2)
Graphics performance, and guide on whether hardware ray tracing may become useful in future.
And then performance per £ depending on deals from third parties.
Most importantly, is coil whine still an issue on the Mac Studio?