Sittin' in the morning sun
I'll be sittin' when the evening comes
Watching the posts scroll in
Then I watch them scroll away again, yeah
I'm sittin' by the drive in the bay
Watchin' the screen scroll away, ooh
I'm just sittin' by the drive in the bay
Wastin' time
I left my work unfinished
Headed for the Forum today
Cuz I've had nothing to live for
And look like nothing's gonna come my way
So, I'm just gon' sit by the drive in the bay
Watchin' the posts scroll away, ooh
I'm sittin' by the drive in the bay
Wastin' time
Looks like nothing's gonna change
Everything still remains the same
I can't do what ten people tell me to do
So I guess I'll remain the same, listen
Sittin' here refreshing the screen
And this Apple store is being so mean, listen
Two thousand times I pray
Just to buy a new mac mini today, now
I'm just gon' sit by the drive in the bay
Watchin' the posts scroll away, ooh
Sittin' by the drive in the bay
Wastin' time
The cheapest Mac Mini at nearly half the price is faster. They're not even competing with themselves with this system. You could manipulate the cost of a display, keyboard and mouse to "attempt" to justify it but you would fail miserably as opinions tend to when challenged by facts.
If they want to make a statement of affordability
999 price tag not 1099
If they want to make a statement of affordability
999 price tag… not 1099
You have to look at profit margins and dynamics. The new iMac is made for Asia primarily where AIOs are a huge market driver due to space and styling. Sure, it will also be big for the US education market where, despite what power users here think, money for an AIO at this price is much easier for districts to propose and approve. Also, most that would buy it have no intention of ever adding RAM after purchase so it makes sense for Apple to protect the higher priced systems by locking this new one down.
For those that think the Mini is such a big seller and therefore is long overdue for an upgrade, you're not thinking the way Apple does. They look at the Mini as a utilitarian machine above all else and for those purposes and the target audience, it still competes with the competition (m93p, 800g1, etc) and is still the lowest cost entry point to the ecosystem for newbies. The target audience (not power users on a budget) won't benefit nearly as much from what the upgrades would be to justify it at the moment (ie 4000 GPU vs 5000 or 5200 and slight proc bump).
I love the iMac and the Minis but you have to know what the target audience is, what sells, and what updates would be available. I would love a new Mini right now and will buy a new one when released, but I'm not going to sit here like most and pretend that Apple is stupid for going so long without a refresh. Those that state the Mini is so important because people use them in the HTPC or rack mount configs, well truth be told the actual number of units sold overall are low to begin with, and only a very small single digit percentage would use them for those purposes.
The Mini will live on, but it won't be because of, or targeted at, HTPC or rack mount buyers, that is just a secondary benefit of the current form factor.
I never thought I would see a cheap product from Apple - meaning a IMac with soldered ram and light weight mobile processor - but....well you know the rest.
A throw away IMac.
I hope this isn't a indication of what may happen to the Mini.
I laughed at all the Arm Mac rumours on the site, "no way would apple take a step back and ditch intel" i said.
After seeing todays iMac, maybe the new Mac Mini is the ATV4. This is like a really bad version of Back to the future. An iMac has not had a CPU in the 1.4 Ghz range since 2004 nor a dual core under 2 Ghz since 2006. I hope Apple is not waiting for a quad core A8 to put in the mini.
Before the release of the late 2013 MP the iMac was more or less the power house of the Mac fleet due to the dated Mac Pro. Now the first New iMac of 2014 is based on a 2013 Macbook Air. I think iOS, Mac Os,iPhone, and Mac are going to converge faster then we thought!
No, it won't be doing a lot of Final Cut editing, but it's not intended to ever see that sort of workload. The specs, even on the low end for us here, are quite good for what most people these days would push.
If they want to make a statement of affordability
999 price tag… not 1099
I hope not all soldered down or even glued down. I like the way with the mini you can buy a basic machine and add more memory hd ssd etc quite easily using an as you go budget. If that goes out the window and the cost is not down the lower end I don't see the point. I still cannot see why they can't or won't release a Haswell mini. It can't be because they believe a two year old processor/graphics combination still cuts it.
You also have to keep remembering that the new iMac isn't targeted to anybody on his thread, or even this section of MR.
Agreed. This is the simple thing that seems to escape folks on tech forums, not just RM. Perhaps a bit of an echo chamber effect where surrounding oneself with techies leads to forgetting the majority of buyers are not propeller heads.
For non-techies, all-in-one systems offer a fairly clean package. No worries about which monitor to buy, how to hook it up, etc.
I really want to see 2000 posts. How about a Haiku slam?
Mini computer
Least expensive Macintosh
How we long for you!
Almost certainly,
square aluminum machine,
you will come. Or not.
I think its funny that every time apple releases an under powered, overpriced piece of junk its intended for education or emerging markets. LOL. Emerging markets are not going to spend $1100 on a clunker when there are so many faster cheaper alternatives. The bottom line is that apple expects a 600% profit on anything they sell and to sell something cheaper means to reduce their cost by the equivalent amount period. Its no different than buying a car and saying you want an extra thousand off and them saying no problem, we can take out the radio. That is not a discount.
I have to disagree as far as if they want OSX they will pay the price for entry level.