2.0 will work fine.Im thinking of going from my tb13in with 3.1/16gb/1tb to the non tb model. Im just concerned over the 2.0 vs 2.4.
I mainly use iTunes, Chrome w/ 15 to 20 tabs open, Tweetbot. Some youtube/netflix maybe but nothing crazy.
2.0 will work fine.Im thinking of going from my tb13in with 3.1/16gb/1tb to the non tb model. Im just concerned over the 2.0 vs 2.4.
I mainly use iTunes, Chrome w/ 15 to 20 tabs open, Tweetbot. Some youtube/netflix maybe but nothing crazy.
If it's anything like the MBA, it is cooled through the keyboard. I had a 2013 13" MBA and upgraded to a 2015 13" MBP in June. On the MBP (and on the 2016 MBP TB models), the sound comes through the speaker grills and the vent, but the TB models sound worse/thinner than the nTB model in YouTube clips I have heard.I noticed that vents have different location than on TB model. Where exactly is the intake and exhaust. Is it more practical than on TB?
does the difference in wifi between the two 13in models have any impact on real-life usage?
While I don't know anything specific about SolidWorks, I'm going to presume it'll run much better with a full 8GB of RAM. If you're going to be running Windows frequently, you may want the 16GB depending on how you're going to be running it.I'm currently gathering the #courage to cancel my 13in TB order (3.1/16/512) and to pull the trigger on a non-tb i5/16/512. I know that 8gb is enough for most of my needs, but I plan to use SolidWorks through Parallels once in a while. That's the reason I'm leaning towards 16gb.
Does anyone know if I need the 16gb to run SolidWorks? Can the i5 even handle SolidWorks?
Another question: does the difference in wifi between the two 13in models have any impact on real-life usage?
Any advice would be extremely appreciated, as I'm currently frozen by indecision.
According to ArsTechnica, the non-touch version has 867Mbps wifi (source), whereas the TB version has 1.3Gbps wifi (source).Could you please enlighten me on what exactly the difference is? I wasn't aware there was a difference between internet connectivity between the two models..
My current laptop has only 4gb of ram, so I have no idea what my usage would be with either 8gb or 16gb. How often did you go over 8gb on your previous MBP?So I'm also trying to decide between 16gb or 8gb. My previous 2013 rMBP had 16gb of ram, but at that time I upgraded because everyone was saying to "futureproof". Now I face the same dilemma.
My current laptop has only 4gb of ram, so I have no idea what my usage would be with either 8gb or 16gb. How often did you go over 8gb on your previous MBP?
Interesting. I have read this, although I don't quite know what it means. How exactly does macOS utilize the extra RAM?Your laptop will utilize all of its RAM regardless. Spare ram is useless RAM, thus the computer makes do of whatever it has.
Interesting. I have read this, although I don't quite know what it means. How exactly does macOS utilize the extra RAM?
Thanks guys :
I'm getting a $200 student discount off the total cost, but it would still be a $430 upgrade. For a 2.4 / 16 / 256, the typical consumer would be paying $AU 2999 as opposed to me $AU 2797.30. So y'all won't think it'll be worth it? Really all I'll be using it for is word processing, occasional video creation for a school project or whatever. On top of the stereotypical teenager thing to do; Netflix, YouTube, FaceBook, etc. I'm thinking the majority of the use will be browser wise as I'm pretty sure Google Docs is encouraged at the school I'll be attending.
I do have Mac Mini (2014) that was issued as a replacement for a 2012 model. It's only dual core as opposed to the quad core it replaced. It's a 3GHz i7, but I notice it doesn't perform nearly as well as my 2012 MacBook Pro with a quad core 2.3GHz i7. The Pro has a SSD installed, but the Mini a fusion-drive. Would the hard drive have anything to do with the performance of the processor? Not very familiar with all this stuff!
Cheers
You'll be fine with the base version and will save 430 dollar. No need in overspending for something you probably will never need.
Im thinking of going from my tb13in with 3.1/16gb/1tb to the non tb model. Im just concerned over the 2.0 vs 2.4.
I mainly use iTunes, Chrome w/ 15 to 20 tabs open, Tweetbot. Some youtube/netflix maybe but nothing crazy.
that's almost double the speed..has anyone actually noticed a difference with this?
Right now my uses are safari with 10-15 tabs open, word, monitor setup through hdmi or usb-c, 3D anatomy apps, and the usual netflix and youtube. What do you guys think, im leaning towards 16gb, but the extra 200$ could be put towards buying an ipad pro.
Also be sure you really need 1tb of storage, that's a big chunk of money. I was first debating whether to get 512gb. But with that kind of money I saved, I can buy a NAS of 4tb and have all my files available and backed up in the cloud. That's more valuable to me.
And you will not benefit from 16gb, it will be 200$ wasted for the pleasure of having a bigger number. 8gb will be more than plenty for your use case, and you'll save a lot of money.
I'm probably going to go with 256gb, and get a usc-c external hard drive when they become more affordable, until then the kingston duo usb 3.0/usb c 64gb drive will do. Would the RAM be helpful when running 3D like apps on a monitor through HDMI? or is that more processor speed?
[doublepost=1479799162][/doublepost]
I guess i'll go with the 8gb and save 200$ then!
3D apps will mostly benefit from the intel iris 540 GPU, which is quite good for a 13inch laptop. Way better than last year's model, practicality the same as the touch bar version.
You'll be happy to have saved 200$
You'll be fine with the base version and will save 430 dollar.
And you will not benefit from 16gb, it will be 200$ wasted for the pleasure of having a bigger number. 8gb will be more than plenty for your use case, and you'll save a lot of money.