Not at all, LOL FPS is only around 70, that is around a $100 cheap display card grade. Most of the games cannot even run with M1 pro or max.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The old Intel model is almost 300% of Max for gaming FPS
- Thread starter babyexercise
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not at all, LOL FPS is only around 70, that is around a $100 cheap display card grade. Most of the games cannot even run with M1 pro or max.
That's patently and utterly false. We have dozens of videos and reviews now. The M1 Max is similar to a desktop 6700 XT and that is conclusive, in gaming and compute.
Yeah I noticed that when I watched the video. Not the first time it happens. I think they're rushing the videos to be the first.
The M1 Max performance is simply outstanding.
At this point, the only thing that REALLY hurts the M1 Max in gaming is, 99% of the games out there aren't native to Apple Silicon.
Why is everyone insisting on checking games on these machines! They are designed for people creating content as a job. Gaming was never a goal. These machines excel at content creation as they are being helped along with secondary processors taking care of a lot of the heavy lifting.
If gaming is what you're after then get a Windows gaming rig and stop bothering the pros here with your childish passtime!
If gaming is what you're after then get a Windows gaming rig and stop bothering the pros here with your childish passtime!
We tried playing PC games on an M1 Max MacBook Pro — it was a disaster
We tried playing PC games on an M1 Max MacBook Pro — it was a disaster
Results were less than optimal
www.tomsguide.com
You should specify which multiple standard programs you are referring to. As far as I can see the European Standardisation Organisations (ESOs) and national standardisation bodies (NSBs) are obliged to establish work programmes and make them publicly available.
I don’t think that this process cant be qualified as ”slow”… I just opened the work programmes of all national standardisation bodies listed here, it was actually really quick.
Maybe you should reset your router?
Glad you have never seen a RTX 3090 with ~1000 GByte/s memory bandwith. The M1 Max has only 400 GByte/s for cpu and gpu together. Even if it would be fast as 6700XT the 3090 is worlds ahead. For Pros with workstations it would be much more suitable to buy a 24 GB GDDR6X RTX 3090 for the price of a Macbook Pro with M1 Max.
We tried playing PC games on an M1 Max MacBook Pro — it was a disaster
We tried playing PC games on an M1 Max MacBook Pro — it was a disaster
Results were less than optimal
They are testing PC games running in Win 11 x64 emulation on top of Parallels virtualization...
So your point is that an ultra high-end video card outperforms a LAPTOP and that's a reason not to get the laptop... so people who want a laptop should just get a desktop + 3090. Or rather, for the price of the entire laptop (which is what they theoretically want in this situation) - they should instead buy *just* the video card... ok
M1 Max versus the Vega II Duo workstation graphics card (same chip as the Vega VII).
The M1 Max wins in Metal gaming and Adobe apps.
Any games you need Crossover/Rosetta for are going to use more resources so of course they are going to have a hard time. The only relevant comparisons would be for M1 native games(vs other platforms) of which there are only a handful
This shows not only do you tell blatant lies in front of everyone but you also don't know how bandwidth in different memory systems function.
The Apple spec is memory bandwidth between the CPU, GPU and VRAM. In other words, system bandwidth.
The Nvidia spec is memory bandwidth between the GPU and VRAM only. The connection to the CPU is bottlenecked.
Apple's has faster system bandwidth.
Yes. If people actually LISTEN to the video, you would know the graph was incorrect. I knew it when he was talking and didn't go yelling on forums that RAAAA M1 is BAAAAAD!!!!!!
LISTEN to video as well as WATCH. If things don't line up between words and visuals, check the comments before making assumptions.
I won't fault Max Tech, YouTube is a "rushing game" to get your content out faster than anyone else so you get the views. And when us humans are rushed, we make more mistakes.
M1 Max versus the Vega II Duo workstation graphics card (same chip as the Vega VII).
The M1 Max wins in Metal gaming and Adobe apps.
What matter is real gaming fps sucks a lot. Lol 70 fps that is not what I expect from a $4000 laptop. Even $400 Windows laptop can have same fps with latest onboard display.
Yeah, all of those Microsoft Surface Pros and Dell XPS models have them with the 400 Watt charging bricks.
It basically comes back to what I said earlier : the only problem with these chips at this point is the games aren't native. One of the only real benchmarks is World of Warcraft.
Other than that, you have to fiddle around with CrossOver or install Windows ARM on Virtual Machines, and both of these are half-assed solutions.