Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

pdoherty

macrumors 65816
Dec 30, 2014
1,491
1,736
It’s especially noticeable with high bit rate HDR videos! Watching some 4k blu ray rips on Infuse on the new iPad Pro has been a true pleasure. Ignore those who try to tell you it is or isn’t worth it for the OLED screen alone, value and worth is subjective!
Sounds like you were comparing the M4 Pro to an older non-M Pro, because HDR content should look almost identical between a 12.9 M1/M2 Pro and the M4 Pro. They all do 1600 nits and blacks will be very similar.

If they were all placed in such a way that you could only see the displays and you lined all 3 up playing the same HDR video I think most people would have a hard time even determining which was which.
 

pdoherty

macrumors 65816
Dec 30, 2014
1,491
1,736
The other day we were calling a family member on FaceTime using an LCD iPad and then switched to my OLED iPad after the battery died on the LCD iPad. Even though it was just a FaceTime call it was noticeable to me but maybe to the casual observer it's not. I'm surprised at the number of people I know IRL that can't immediately tell the difference between ProMotion and 60Hz which is a bigger deal than OLED in my opinion.

For all forms of media, including SDR content, the tandem OLED is wonderful. It's easily the best display I've ever used. I can't wait for the MacBook Pros to get this tech in a few years, it's my biggest want for the MBP line.

I will say it's not just the obvious benefits of OLED (color and contrast), it's also the M4 chip and significantly better pixel response times that nobody seems to rave about. The beautiful display is accentuated by the fact that every app I use is BUTTER smooth with zero lag. The best demonstration of this is panning and zooming around Maps, it's dare I say magical how smooth the experience is. In fact the pixel response times are probably more noticeable than the color and contrast in my opinion.

Quinn Nelson said it best: the M4 iPad is the fastest feeling computer I've ever used. Yes I get stuff done faster on my Mac but the iPad feels faster.
Curious how one notices/feels pixel response that's faster than the actual draw rate (refresh rate) of the screen itself? If the hardware is only sending 120 fps updates how would you even notice if the pixel response is, say, 10 times faster? You'll still be looking at the same pixel color/position for 1/120th of a second regardless of how fast the pixel refresh rate is.
 

zachchen1996

macrumors member
Nov 5, 2017
60
149
Sounds like you were comparing the M4 Pro to an older non-M Pro, because HDR content should look almost identical between a 12.9 M1/M2 Pro and the M4 Pro. They all do 1600 nits and blacks will be very similar.

If they were all placed in such a way that you could only see the displays and you lined all 3 up playing the same HDR video I think most people would have a hard time even determining which was which.
No I was comparing to the M2 iPad Pro as well, the difference in contrast ratio (especially in a dark environment) and lack of blooming (huge for me) is very noticeable to me. If it’s not obvious to you, consider yourself lucky! It will save you a lot of money haha. Everyone’s perceptions and sensitivities to picture quality differences is entirely subjective, so that’s why I always tell people that they need to judge for themselves. I’m very much enjoying my M4 iPad Pro and am not looking back. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: dantay and judethat

zakarhino

Contributor
Sep 13, 2014
2,610
6,963
Curious how one notices/feels pixel response that's faster than the actual draw rate (refresh rate) of the screen itself? If the hardware is only sending 120 fps updates how would you even notice if the pixel response is, say, 10 times faster? You'll still be looking at the same pixel color/position for 1/120th of a second regardless of how fast the pixel refresh rate is.

Well draw rate and pixel response play off of one another and improving one without improving the other leads to some diminishing effects. Refresh rate determines how often the screen updates with new information like you mentioned, but pixel response time measures how quickly a pixel can change to accommodate that new information. If pixels have a slow response rate, they are still showing old information when fast moving subjects are on screen so you end up with ghosting/smearing. This is why gaming monitors advertise their pixel response time alongside the refresh rate, because gamers know bad pixel response means the extra frame data from a high refresh monitor is pointless because it won't help them see enemies when moving/panning their player's view, they'll just see a blurry image.

For example the M4 iPad Pro and MacBook Pro technically have the same refresh rate but the MBP's screen has notoriously bad pixel response time. If you try to quickly scroll through text on the MacBook the text is hard to read because it's blurry. When you do the same on the iPad the text is much easier to read. The scrolling "smoothness" looks the same, but one is legible and the other is not. I very quickly noticed it after panning around Maps on my iPad and realized I could read landmark names as I'm scrolling which I couldn't really do on my ProMotion LCD iPad Pro, that's when I realized OLED pixel response times are insanely quick -- among the best in display tech. That's why OLED gaming monitors are getting a lot of hype right now, the HDR is great but the pixel response is just as much of a selling point.

Here's a simple representation of why pixel response time matters:

Screenshot 2024-06-29 at 10.08.10 AM.png
 

jonnyb098

macrumors 601
Nov 16, 2010
4,248
6,492
Michigan
Wow, this definitely showcases the display. Finally able to see how much better it looks. I guess more mundane apps or webpages won't really show how capable the new iPad Pro is.
That’s the thing….in day to day use the M4 screen is a bit nicer but really not a huge deal till you see HDR content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSoares

pdoherty

macrumors 65816
Dec 30, 2014
1,491
1,736
I'm thinking most people aren't trying to use their iPads in broad daylight. Not just because the screen is harder to see but the iPads (and phones) tend to overheat quickly. Heck, my iPhone inside an air conditioned car, if exposed to sunlight at all, will discontinue charging due to heat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Romain_H

Surfsalot

Suspended
Mar 18, 2023
2,049
2,028
I'm thinking most people aren't trying to use their iPads in broad daylight. Not just because the screen is harder to see but the iPads (and phones) tend to overheat quickly. Heck, my iPhone inside an air conditioned car, if exposed to sunlight at all, will discontinue charging due to heat.

Think you will find they meant outdoor under cover, not in direct sun use.
Less glare on the M4's that I tried.
 

Student of Life

macrumors 6502a
Oct 13, 2020
786
892

zachchen1996

macrumors member
Nov 5, 2017
60
149
Thanks, did not know this existed. So wait to watch it you downloaded a 70+ gb file? Any idea if this is supposed to come out to streaming, that reddit link is two years old.
Yup! It’s totally worth it haha. Actually it’s coming out on 4K Blu Ray next year!

https://www.reddit.com/r/tron/comments/1ckbqfo

So if you want to watch it on your iPad you’d need to remux it as an iso file or mkv file and play it back on Infuse Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Student of Life

Aka757

macrumors 6502
Sep 22, 2016
302
443
Houston
Oh no, i’ll never be able to use my iPad again if the background isn’t completely black.
That’s the beauty of choice, isn’t it? Those of us that appreciate the upgrade and are willing to pay for it, can do so, and no one is being forced to upgrade!

There’s also a matter of subjectivity as well. I don’t think anyone will argue that a previous iPad is completely unusable due to the lack of an OLED panel, but for certain users it does make a noticeable difference.

For example, many folks don’t care about or don’t even notice the difference between 60 hz and 120 hz refresh rates. For me, all the devices I use on a daily basis (iPhone, iPad, MacBook, computer monitor) have high refresh rates, so going from a 120 hz panel to a 60 hz panel is actually jarring. Doesn’t mean I couldn’t use a device locked to 60 hz; just that it makes a difference to me in use.
 

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,311
25,460
Wales, United Kingdom
That’s the beauty of choice, isn’t it? Those of us that appreciate the upgrade and are willing to pay for it, can do so, and no one is being forced to upgrade!

There’s also a matter of subjectivity as well. I don’t think anyone will argue that a previous iPad is completely unusable due to the lack of an OLED panel, but for certain users it does make a noticeable difference.

For example, many folks don’t care about or don’t even notice the difference between 60 hz and 120 hz refresh rates. For me, all the devices I use on a daily basis (iPhone, iPad, MacBook, computer monitor) have high refresh rates, so going from a 120 hz panel to a 60 hz panel is actually jarring. Doesn’t mean I couldn’t use a device locked to 60 hz; just that it makes a difference to me in use.

It certainly is the beauty of choice and the beauty of not being preached to by tech snobs who look down on devices that aren’t as technically advanced. It’s not unique to iPads and seems to be the case with all Apple products now. If it hasn’t got ‘Pro’ in the name, it’s often looked down upon amongst enthusiasts while the general user couldn’t give a toss.

I’m lucky in that my eyes can process refresh rates very well, so going from 60hz to 120hz is very minimal to me. Some notice a huge difference and the mistake that is often made is assuming everybody sees the same difference. The OLED thing was a big debate here with the iPhone X and now pretty much all of us use devices with OLED screens, it’s not the big deal it was once made out to be.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.