Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
Hi all,
Question about dual bay nvme + RAID0.
Does anyone have any experience with this enclosure or can recommend an alternative?

Sabrent Dual NVME to TB 3

Here is a review which shows seq read /write of ~2800/2500 MB/s when put into RAID0


Context:

I'm interested in getting two nvmes to put into RAID0, purely to increase random read/write times.
I'm aware of RAID0 risks - i'm not wildly concerned with dataloss, consider it more a large scratch disk - (I have a networked RAID6 HDD box currently) but have achieved some good software RAID0 performance gains in the past with HDDs and software RAID.

I have an m1 max 16'' macbook pro.
The general consensus seems to be: get an Acasis or Orico and that sabrent is generally fine, but can be a bit dodgy.

It seems to be very difficult to find many real alternatives to this dual bay / 2 drive enclosure, and I'm wondering if maybe there is a reason for this?

I've read that I'm not really going to get close to thunderbolt bus bandwidth saturation on my MBP unless I can make use of 2 PCIe lanes, enabled by RAID0.

My application: I'm doing audio post production, I use a lot of sample libraries, my bottle neck is generally loading lots and lots (1000s, 10s of thousands) of small audio files (few hundred kb to 1MB) into memory as fast as possible which is why i'm more interested in random read/write than sequential.


So, can any of you experienced people set me straight?
Should I just be getting a TBU405 and a WD 850x and call it a day?
Or maybe this new one from satechi that uses TB4?
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
It seems to be very difficult to find many real alternatives to this dual bay / 2 drive enclosure, and I'm wondering if maybe there is a reason for this?
OWC has some multi blade enclosures. They seem kind of pricey but they likely do not sell many of them so that is probably why they are expensive. OWC does not have a stellar reputation around here with regard to enclosures though. Enclosure makers have been exclusively using Intel's TB controllers. There are a few new USB4 controllers in the pipeline so we might see some price competition by the end of the year.
 
I suppose the latency will be the same but RAID0 will read twice as many blocks?
Yes this was my general understanding, and of course someone more knowledgeable can feel free to jump in and correct this, but block location latency does not improve, in fact it can go up.
But there is a significant improvement on read times for the files themselves, as long as queue depth is greater than 1.
They are small but not like 1 byte small.
I guess specifying random performance was not really accurate, my bad.
 
Found a SSD enclosure on Amazon about 33% less expensive than the ACASIS and ORICO enclosures. The device claims to be TB4/USB4 with a JHL 7440 controller.
- MacBook Pro M2 Max
- MacOS Ventura 13.3
- INDMEM U4001A TB4/USB4 enclosure, connected via the supplied cable directly to MBP TB4 port.
- Samsung 980 PRO 1TB PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD
- Disk is formatted as APFS(not encrypted)

System Information shows the device enumerates as a Thunderbolt device with 40 Gbps speed. Vendor Name is Intel.


Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB : Apple M2 Max.png
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: ekwipt
TB4/USB4 with a JHL 7440 controller
It supports Thunderbolt 3 and USB.

It uses the Intel Titan Ridge controller for Thunderbolt support. It has a separate USB to NVMe controller for USB support.

It will be limited to USB 10 Gbps if connected to a USB4 host that does not support Thunderbolt (since Thunderbolt support for USB4 hosts is optional).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brian33
Incidentally, does anymore know if it's possible to update WD SN850x firmware using a TB enclosure on a Windows laptop that has Type-C port? I have no access to a PC desktop that I can install the ssd internally. I've read that the WD Dashboard app cannot update the SSD via USB connection, but I'm throwing this out here anyway to see if anyone has an idea how I can update the firmware with no access to a Windows desktop and machine with Thunderbolt.
 
Incidentally, does anymore know if it's possible to update WD SN850x firmware using a TB enclosure on a Windows laptop that has Type-C port? I have no access to a PC desktop that I can install the ssd internally. I've read that the WD Dashboard app cannot update the SSD via USB connection, but I'm throwing this out here anyway to see if anyone has an idea how I can update the firmware with no access to a Windows desktop and machine with Thunderbolt.
Yes, can confirm that you can do this. I hooked up the WD SN850X using an Acasis enclosure on an Intel i5 iMac running bootcamp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EugW and Erpler
Yes, can confirm that you can do this. I hooked up the WD SN850X using an Acasis enclosure on an Intel i5 iMac running bootcamp.

I've done that too, but a Mac running BootCamp would still have Thunderbolt. I think the question was if you can update the firmware using a PC with a non-Thunderbolt USB-C port.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacStudioDude
Your laptop has a battery that will last much longer than 10s when power is lost so it’s irrelevant.

By your comment about not carrying a UPS around. It suggest you’re not using it on a desktop (where a UPS would be better)
Right!
And even he is on a desktop, that 10s won't make any good since the desktop was dead when power was cut.
 
Hi all, I am thinking of replacing my Samsung X5 since it's thermal throttling is ridiculous and it slows down too much even under not so heavy load. Even when cool, write speeds don't go above 1500MB/sec and too often when I am doing some database operations drops to even less than 200MB/sec which is ridiculous. I have read many reports of the same issues with this drive and the overheating.

After reading the last 10 pages of he thread I am interested in one of these two enclosures:

Acasis


or Orico

And for the SSD either

Seagate Firecuda


or

Samsung 980 Pro

Which combination do you recommend? Or do you recommend something different? Also can you please confirm that the Acasis enclosure in the link is the one many of you talk about? Unfortunately the descriptions on Amazon Germany are not that great so I am confused as to whether it's the same unit mnetioned here so often.

I hope I can get some clarification soon because I am keen to order. Thanks!
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Hi all, I am thinking of replacing my Samsung X5 since it's thermal throttling is ridiculous and it slows down too much even under not so heavy load. Even when cool, write speeds don't go above 1500MB/sec and too often when I am doing some database operations drops to even less than 200MB/sec which is ridiculous. I have read many reports of the same issues with this drive and the overheating.

After reading the last 10 pages of he thread I am interested in one of these two enclosures:

Acasis


or Orico

And for the SSD either

Seagate Firecuda


or

Samsung 980 Pro

Which combination do you recommend? Or do you recommend something different? Also can you please confirm that the Acasis enclosure in the link is the one many of you talk about? Unfortunately the descriptions on Amazon Germany are not that great so I am confused as to whether it's the same unit mnetioned here so often.

I hope I can get some clarification soon because I am keen to order. Thanks!
Hi there.
If you want to save money and can wait, I would get this.

Acasis

And get a 2TB SSD, for future proofing.

WD SN850X 2TB

I found that the WD was faster than the 980PRO.

Hope this helps!
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Hi there.
If you want to save money and can wait, I would get this.

Acasis

And get a 2TB SSD, for future proofing.

WD SN850X 2TB

I found that the WD was faster than the 980PRO.

Hope this helps!

It's 20 euros difference buying from China and I would have to wait one month so it's not worth it for me. For the drive I only use 500GB now so 1TB will be enough for a while. What kind of speeds do you think I would get with this enclosure and drive you recommend? Also how is the cooling with the Acasis? That's one thing I am worried about because the Samsung X5 I got now thottles at a ridiculous level.
 
Hi all,
Question about dual bay nvme + RAID0.
Does anyone have any experience with this enclosure or can recommend an alternative?

Sabrent Dual NVME to TB 3

Here is a review which shows seq read /write of ~2800/2500 MB/s when put into RAID0


Context:

I'm interested in getting two nvmes to put into RAID0, purely to increase random read/write times.
I'm aware of RAID0 risks - i'm not wildly concerned with dataloss, consider it more a large scratch disk - (I have a networked RAID6 HDD box currently) but have achieved some good software RAID0 performance gains in the past with HDDs and software RAID.

I have an m1 max 16'' macbook pro.
The general consensus seems to be: get an Acasis or Orico and that sabrent is generally fine, but can be a bit dodgy.

It seems to be very difficult to find many real alternatives to this dual bay / 2 drive enclosure, and I'm wondering if maybe there is a reason for this?

I've read that I'm not really going to get close to thunderbolt bus bandwidth saturation on my MBP unless I can make use of 2 PCIe lanes, enabled by RAID0.

My application: I'm doing audio post production, I use a lot of sample libraries, my bottle neck is generally loading lots and lots (1000s, 10s of thousands) of small audio files (few hundred kb to 1MB) into memory as fast as possible which is why i'm more interested in random read/write than sequential.


So, can any of you experienced people set me straight?
Should I just be getting a TBU405 and a WD 850x and call it a day?
Or maybe this new one from satechi that uses TB4?

I had this drive a while back…..here are my thoughts…..

 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Hi all, I am thinking of replacing my Samsung X5 since it's thermal throttling is ridiculous and it slows down too much even under not so heavy load. Even when cool, write speeds don't go above 1500MB/sec and too often when I am doing some database operations drops to even less than 200MB/sec which is ridiculous. I have read many reports of the same issues with this drive and the overheating.

After reading the last 10 pages of he thread I am interested in one of these two enclosures:

Acasis


or Orico

And for the SSD either

Seagate Firecuda


or

Samsung 980 Pro

Which combination do you recommend? Or do you recommend something different? Also can you please confirm that the Acasis enclosure in the link is the one many of you talk about? Unfortunately the descriptions on Amazon Germany are not that great so I am confused as to whether it's the same unit mnetioned here so often.

I hope I can get some clarification soon because I am keen to order. Thanks!

ORICO Drive tested here with a 980 Pro SSD:

 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: VitoBotta
ORICO Drive tested here with a 980 Pro SSD:


You have an awesome channel! Since you have tested a lot of stuff, which enclosure+drive would you recommend that doesn't suffer from overheating and guarantees stable performance? Also, are you aware of any solution to improve the cooling of the Samsung X5 which I could try before replacing it? Even when it's not too hot and the read speeds are around 2800 MB/sec as advertised, the writes hardly go above 900-1000 MB/sec :(
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.