Yeah, it's ultimately about greed. But both Google and Apple should push their greed aside to build a messaging solution that works out for the end user. All Google did was mimic iMessage with RCS, there has to be some middle ground between the two companies. Im sure Google would relinquish control if that means they won't have to deal with the blue vs green bubbles dilemma.Although if Apple was altruistic and wanted to open up the messaging market they are in a bad place. RCS as it exists today is a proprietary Google solution, the carriers, due to their own greed, abandoned it long ago. Apple incorporating Googles RCS would give Google too much control.
Advocating bullying is not a nice look, especially for something as trivial as choice of messaging app.maybe Android users should start bullying iPhone users that exclusively use iMessage.
Buy her another oneShe already has one, now what?
This has nothing to do with adopting rcs. Privacy is about your pii and extended pii, security has to do with keeping the data in the apple ecosystem safe and apple can only encrypt what it has control over.
I’m not participating but thanks. Apple doesn’t want to participate Probably because google controls rcs.
Advocating bullying is not a nice look, especially for something as trivial as choice of messaging app.
Is this a real post? So just say no to it stick to completely unencrypted everyone has access SMS. Make sure you are using Http on all websites too.The lack of encryption throughout the RCS system (let alone whether it is using a Google or other off device key vs not) is the best reason to just say no to it.
Some people don't want corporations, let alone groups like the CSP/DFS/FSB/CIA/FBI/NSA/SEBIN etc, to have unfettered access to private communications despite the fact that some of them would like to profit from doing so.
Because the carriers adopted RCS as a coming replacement for SMS. SMS is where it is still as it is universally supported by everyone including Apple and carriers.what'sapp...
why RCS protocol?, why not Signal protocol?, or Whatsapp protocol? or FB Messanger protocol?...or why to bother with this **** anyway?
Apple claims they care about privacy and information but sticks to unsecure SMS.It’s not Apple’s fault that Google messed about for years jumping from one messenger app to another and didn’t come up with anything good. Now they want Apple to bend over backwards to bail them out.
You know anything about the apple ecosystem? Please explain then because anyone who spouts privacy, security and encryption should understand.You know nothing about RCS I see.
It is anti-competitive. Stop cheerleading for a company, it's embarrassing.It’s not anticompetitive. And you don’t run a successful business by giving the consumer everything they want.
No, it’s not. That’s the Pro. The regular 14 is cheaper. Still damn expensive, so no need to bend the truth.What are the poors complaining about? The new iphone in Europe is only 1500€, jUsT bUy EvErYoNe YoU kNoW a NeW iPhOnE.
Force an insecure, technologically inferior standard?Give it a year and regulators will force it on him, like they’ve forced USB-C into their iPhones.