Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Tim Cook is always trying to find ways to cut corners and give customers less while either not lowering prices or actually increasing prices. His latest scam is to use the previous generation iPhone CPUs in the latest non-Pro models.

That wasn’t always the case. Even all three generations of cheapest low-end budget model iPhone SE (2016, 2020, and 2022) received the exact same CPU that was in most expensive high-end iPhone model at the time.

The reason for this new scam is so Apple can save money on manufacturing and not pass those savings on to the customers, thus maximizing profits for Apple. Furthermore, it will likely cause customers who purchase non-Pro models to upgrade sooner since their phones will slow down sooner than those who purchased the Pro models, thus maximizing Apple’s profits even more.
Got it... purchasing more apple stock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacCheetah3
Tim Cook is always trying to find ways to cut corners and give customers less while either not lowering prices or actually increasing prices. His latest scam is to use the previous generation iPhone CPUs in the latest non-Pro models.

That wasn’t always the case. Even all three generations of cheapest low-end budget model iPhone SE (2016, 2020, and 2022) received the exact same CPU that was in most expensive high-end iPhone model at the time.

The reason for this new scam is so Apple can save money on manufacturing and not pass those savings on to the customers, thus maximizing profits for Apple. Furthermore, it will likely cause customers who purchase non-Pro models to upgrade sooner since their phones will slow down sooner than those who purchased the Pro models, thus maximizing Apple’s profits even more.
I wish more people voted with their wallet.
 
99% of people buying wouldn't know.
Correct. And Tim Cook knows that, which is precisely why he does it. Cook knows the vast majority of customers are not going to check the specs, and instead they'll just assume that it's the latest model and therefore must be faster than the previous year's model.
 
Correct. And Tim Cook knows that, which is precisely why he does it. Cook knows the vast majority of customers are not going to check the specs, and instead they'll just assume that it's the latest model and therefore must be faster than the previous year's model.
I pretty much don't buy anything new from apple anymore, FBMP or gumtree is my go to, you need to know what you are doing though. My 14 pro 256gb I got new for $1KAUD, retail is $1899AUD.
Obviously you have to wait 3-6 months after release to get these deals.

Apple prices a rort here, and that is coming from someone with a house load lol.
 
Tim Cook is always trying to find ways to cut corners and give customers less while either not lowering prices or actually increasing prices. His latest scam is to use the previous generation iPhone CPUs in the latest non-Pro models.

That wasn’t always the case. Even all three generations of cheapest low-end budget model iPhone SE (2016, 2020, and 2022) received the exact same CPU that was in most expensive high-end iPhone model at the time.

The reason for this new scam is so Apple can save money on manufacturing and not pass those savings on to the customers, thus maximizing profits for Apple. Furthermore, it will likely cause customers who purchase non-Pro models to upgrade sooner since their phones will slow down sooner than those who purchased the Pro models, thus maximizing Apple’s profits even more.

You can buy Redmi or accept Tim cut much more corners very soon.
 
OP needs to learn how the business world works 😂
It worked differently under Steve Jobs. Jobs was able to make profits and have high profit margins without Tim Cook’s practice of cutting corners and raising prices by an additional 25% (well before the inflation of the last few years).

Cook has removed chargers and headphones from iPhone boxes, and then raises prices on the iPhone. With Mac laptops, he removed extension chords and microfiber cloths and raised prices on the laptops. Everything that he removed is now sold separately. He’s trying to squeeze as much money as he can out of customers by giving them as little as possible.

It’s possible to make profits without the high level of greed of Cook.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Chidoro and Orka
Well, it worked differently under Steve Jobs. Jobs was able to make profits and have high profit margins without cutting corners and raising prices by an additional 25%.

Tim Cook has removed chargers and headphones from iPhone boxes, and then raises prices on the iPhone. With Mac laptops, he removed extension chords and microfiber cloths and raised prices on the laptops. Everything that he removed is now sold separately.

It’s possible to make profits without the high level of greed of Cook.
Steve Jobs said the famous quote "you're holding it wrong" ... so I'm not sure what mean. Steve Jobs did wonderful things. But he was far from perfect. Steve Jobs was also the one to make Tim Cook the new CEO to take his place, so he thought he was up to the job. And so far, that has most definitely been true. The premise of this thread is inherently false.
 
It worked differently under Steve Jobs. Jobs was able to make profits and have high profit margins without Tim Cook’s practice of cutting corners and raising prices by an additional 25% (well before the inflation of the last few years).

Cook has removed chargers and headphones from iPhone boxes, and then raises prices on the iPhone. With Mac laptops, he removed extension chords and microfiber cloths and raised prices on the laptops. Everything that he removed is now sold separately.

It’s possible to make profits without the high level of greed of Cook.
I think "shareholder greed" is the term you're looking for. This is the problem with basically all publicly traded companies, they're expected to be infinitely profitable in a finite world. Apple under Cook has done a lot of things I fundamentally disagree with, but so did Apple under Jobs. The lesson: companies aren't your friends. None have your best interests at heart.
 
Lol no

I have user replaceable batteries in my EPRIB designed to be used on a sinking ship at sea, that’s tends to be a wet violent environment, OKed by the USCG and trusted and proven in plenty of life or death situations, all A OK

I have user replaceable batteries in many weapons systems, lights, optics, which are mounted to recoiling weapons, splashed, muddied, all weather conditions and take tons of recoil, proven in life or death situations, works fine, and not just my opinion, USMC, Army, Air Force, Navy, tons of local PDs and millions of private citizens, all A OK

Medical tools, numerous ventilators, monitors, laryngoscopes, etc, tend to get a little “messy” on occasion, obviously used in critical missions, all A OK

So tell me again why a user replaceable battery can’t withstand being in some hipsters skinny jeans pocket 😂
Easy enough. Read my words. No one said removable batteries did not have good usages like those you list, just that they were not optimal for consumer cellphones for the clear reasons that I listed. And, like you reference, the issue of fitting into skinny jeans pocket is essential to the design engineering of a consumer cell phone.

E.g. I have pro Nikons and a couple of dozen Milwaukee battery operated tools all with removable batteries that are definitely the way to go with those items. But I do not try to stick my Nikons or power tools in my not skinny ;~) jeans pockets.

My non-removable iPhone battery always lasts a full day and is easily MagSafe recharged while I drive, while I am at my desk, or while I sleep. In my opinion the non-removable battery choice was an improvement and apparently Apple agrees.
 
Last edited:
It worked differently under Steve Jobs. Jobs was able to make profits and have high profit margins without Tim Cook’s practice of cutting corners and raising prices by an additional 25% (well before the inflation of the last few years).

Cook has removed chargers and headphones from iPhone boxes, and then raises prices on the iPhone. With Mac laptops, he removed extension chords and microfiber cloths and raised prices on the laptops. Everything that he removed is now sold separately. He’s trying to squeeze as much money as he can out of customers by giving them as little as possible.

It’s possible to make profits without the high level of greed of Cook.
Sorry to burst your bubble. It may have been dressed up better but Apples job is to make that money, 30-40% profit. Get every last cent out of every cable, which used to fall apart after 6 months, but hey, it’s environmentally sound that’s why it’s flimsy. They make some nice kit and sell it well but they don’t give a F about anything other than making money, it has always been this way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InvertedGoldfish
Easy enough. Read my words. No one said removable batteries did not have good usages like those you list, just that they were not optimal for consumer cellphones for the clear reasons that I listed. And, like you reference, the issue of fitting into skinny jeans pocket is essential to the design engineering of a consumer cell phone.

E.g. I have pro Nikons and a couple of dozen Milwaukee battery operated tools all with removable batteries that are definitely the way to go with those items. But I do not try to stick my Nikons or power tools in my not skinny ;~) jeans pockets.

My non-removable iPhone battery always lasts a full day and is easily MagSafe recharged while I drive, while I am at my desk, or while I sleep. In my opinion the non-removable battery choice was an improvement and apparently Apple agrees.

I’m not saying have it clip on the bottom like a dewalt drill

How about just don’t use proprietary screws and bind everything by serial number, Apple innovates more on ways to limit people who want to extend the lifespan of their device, then on their actual devices themselves, all while BSing about being “green”
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThomasJL
Easy enough. Read my words. No one said removable batteries did not have good usages like those you list, just that they were not optimal for consumer cellphones for the clear reasons that I listed. And, like you reference, the issue of fitting into skinny jeans pocket is essential to the design engineering of a consumer cell phone.

E.g. I have pro Nikons and a couple of dozen Milwaukee battery operated tools all with removable batteries that are definitely the way to go with those items. But I do not try to stick my Nikons or power tools in my not skinny ;~) jeans pockets.

My non-removable iPhone battery always lasts a full day and is easily MagSafe recharged while I drive, while I am at my desk, or while I sleep. In my opinion the non-removable battery choice was an improvement and apparently Apple agrees.
Apple could easily make the battery replaceable by having a simple to remove back plate with a rubber non glued gasket. Have the battery connected with an easily removable connector and pull able glue strips so you can remove the back, unplug the connector, pull the glue strips then swap in a new battery. That’s all the requirement is, it doesn't have to be an encased clip on battery like other devices It just has to be easily user serviceable/replaceable..
 
  • Like
Reactions: InvertedGoldfish
Apple could easily make the battery replaceable by having a simple to remove back plate with a rubber non glued gasket. Have the battery connected with an easily removable connector and pull able glue strips so you can remove the back, unplug the connector, pull the glue strips then swap in a new battery. That’s all the requirement is, it doesn't have to be an encased clip on battery like other devices It just has to be easily user serviceable/replaceable..
Why are people so obsessed with user replaceable batteries? So they can replace it when it gets old? You can already do that.
 
Why are people so obsessed with user replaceable batteries? So they can replace it when it gets old? You can already do that.

Not really, you cant just go get a battery, you have to ask apple for permission and give them serial numbers

But yeah, expensive device that runs on a battery, and seeing batteries have a life span, yah think folks are kinda into being able to easily replace a wear and tear part in their thousand dollar plus phone 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThomasJL
Not really, you cant just go get a battery, you have to ask apple for permission and give them serial numbers

But yeah, expensive device that runs on a battery, and seeing batteries have a life span, yah think folks are kinda into being able to easily replace a wear and tear part in their thousand dollar plus phone 🤷‍♂️
You take the phone to a repair shop. Ask them to replace the battery. Come back an hour later and pick up your phone. And you are good to go for the next several years.

What’s the big deal with that?
 
It worked differently under Steve Jobs. Jobs was able to make profits and have high profit margins without Tim Cook’s practice of cutting corners and raising prices by an additional 25% (well before the inflation of the last few years).
I never understood the Steve Jobs worship. he was a very smart man who did what he did very well, but for some reason people think that means he only did the best things, and was the most ethical and honest person. Maybe it’s because he’s not alive anymore. People have this weird thing of trashing someone while they’re alive, but once they’re dead acting like they were the greatest person in the world

Cook has removed chargers and headphones from iPhone boxes, and then raises prices on the iPhone. With Mac laptops, he removed extension chords and microfiber cloths and raised prices on the laptops. Everything that he removed is now sold separately. He’s trying to squeeze as much money as he can out of customers by giving them as little as possible.
Removing extra accessories that people didn’t use was an environmental decision. If 9 out of 10 people leave the accessory in the box that means 90% e-waste. It sucks for the 10% who wanted the particular accessory. Not only is there an e-waste factor but also shipping factor because look at how small the iPhone box is now versus before they did this. As usual, Samsung criticized Apple for doing this, then did exactly the same thing because it makes sense. Now many phone manufacturers don’t include chargers or headphones.

Also, I’m not sure why you think Tim Cook raised the priced of Apple laptops? The prices have gone up and down slightly but the MacBook Air for example is actually cheaper today than it was before Tim Cook was CEO. That’s not counting inflation because if you took that into consideration, it would be considerably cheaper.

I feel like you’re looking at things from through “the good ole days” lenses. It’s easy to look back in time and think wow it was great back then. It’s because people look back at what they remember was great but forget anything negative.
 
You take the phone to a repair shop. Ask them to replace the battery. Come back an hour later and pick up your phone. And you are good to go for the next several years.

What’s the big deal with that?
To be honest, I miss the ability to pop the back off a phone and replace the battery. What I don’t miss is the battery flying off when I dropped the phone or lack of water resistance.

As you said, there’s really no restrictions on replacing the battery on an iPhone. You can choose to go to the Apple Store which is what I would do or go to some shop in the mall and they will do it as well. Either way your phone is going to work for a few more years.
 
A scam would be telling people it’s the same chip in both devices but secretly crippling the one in the non-pro models. This is just differentiating the two tiers differently than how they’ve done in the past.

How about calling it iPhone 14 but using iPhone 13 cpu?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.