You're right about the Intel 760p but if you look at the charts, each drive has their pros and cons. There are a few drives in that list that are rated for 1500mb/s + write speed but it has something to do with the drive itself. My 760p write speeds are consistent with the charts from gilles_polysoft but its still faster than the 2014 OEM SSD. Sabrent has its pros and cons as well, it has extremely low power usage but look at the write speeds, you're sacrificing 500 MB/s.
The sx8200 pro is definitely better but can't speak about power usage. Have you changed any of your pmset settings? Are you saying that with hibernate mode 25 it works and you don't have wakeup problems even without a modded bootrom? My 2014 MBP has a bootrom of 149 but the latest version of mojave updates it to 151, maybe you can check?
If you set standby=0 and hibernatemode = 25 and then write pmset sleepnow, when you wake up the Mac does it restore your session successfully?
[doublepost=1554225457][/doublepost]
Lol this intel 600p was such a bad drive, it had the worst power consumption for its performance. I have good performance with my 760p, 1650/600 read/write, its so much better than the 600p. I think for performance the sx8200 pro or 760p seems to be a good choice, and the intel 660p/sabrent seem to be the more power efficient ones if you're willing to get into QLC territory or sacrifice some speed.
[doublepost=1554226080][/doublepost]
Well I don't even know anymore. In the charts the Apple SSDs specify that they are PCIe based with 1000mb/s + read write speeds which is definitely not the case with my 2014 128gb OEM MBP SSD, I was getting like 600mb/s read and 250 mb/s write depending on how full the drive was. The power ratings for this drive aren't specified in the charts, but when you compare lets say HP 920, 760p, sx8200, and Sabrent to the Apple SSDs in the charts, only the idle power consumption is higher with the NVME drive, the read/write/avg consumptions are all on par, or lower, somewhere within 0.2 watts of each other. In fact sometimes the read or write power could be significantly lower than the Apple SSD yet people are reporting a decrease in battery life. Could it be that MacBooks that came with the Apple SSDs listed in the chart will actually get better battery life with a more efficient aftermarket drive since they are already optimized for these types of drives? If this is true for the 2014 MBP then I have no idea why one would like 1-1.5 hours of battery life by switching to a sabrent, sx8200, or 760p.
