Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Heatboy

macrumors member
Nov 16, 2018
41
20
Denmark
The Blue vs Black speed tests are attached below:

WD Blue NVME 1TB in ACASIS enclosure attached to MBP 16GB/1TB via Thunderbolt 3 cable.
View attachment 1731524

WD Black NVME 1TB in ACASIS enclosure attached to MBP 16GB/1TB
View attachment 1731526
Tests were run using Black Magic Speed Test, DiskMark and Sensei Apps. The results are a little noisy but the Black edition is definitely faster overall?
Thanks a lot for your testing, really appreciate it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jzjz2021

Heatboy

macrumors member
Nov 16, 2018
41
20
Denmark
No, just read would be a bug in macOS. Check it out here. Not sure it applies to the M1's though. I will test when I receive my Acasis enclosure.

Just saw this. Another USB4 enclosure from Orico, just came out. One review on the German Amazon page, where it was tested on an MBP M1, with a WD Black 2Tb drive. Great speeds it seems. Seems to me we need the Intel 7440 chip to get speeds as high as on an Intel Mac.

 

Sarpanch

macrumors regular
Jan 12, 2013
138
128
SoCal
Updated my M1 Macbook Air to Big Sur 11.2.1 and unfortunately both USB related issues are still present.

1) Cable Matters and Ugreen USB to SATA enclosures still connecting at 5Gb/s
2) NVMe USB SSD giving ~20% less speed compared to Intel Macs

I have not received any updates from Apple Engineering team either for almost 2 months (since they last took diagnostic data dumps). Anyone else had any luck getting a reply from Apple?
 

AppleTO

macrumors 65816
Oct 31, 2018
1,112
3,065
Toronto, Canada
I’m also having speed issues with my M1 MacBook Air as well. I have a WD Black NVMe 500GB SSD in this enclosure (which I purchased locally).

It’s connected at 10Gbps according to system report, but I can can only get about 550MB/s max read and write.

On my Windows 10 machine, the read/write seems to max out at about 1050MB/s, which is pretty good for a 10Gbps connection.

I really hope Apple can fix this with updated software/firmware.
 

Donza

macrumors regular
Nov 14, 2006
201
97
Finland
I've been doing some tests with an Elgato Cam Link 4K. It's able to capture 4K video (24p or 30p) just fine on an older Intel MacBook Pro, but on a new MacBook Pro M1 with 16GB of RAM, it's dropping frames (between 1-4 per second). I'm wondering if this issue is related to the USB issues in this thread, too, or potentially something different?
I wonder if this is still a problem with latest Big Sur version?
 

VillageBoy

macrumors newbie
Feb 4, 2021
1
0
I have an i-tec MySafe USB-C M.2 SATA Drive Metal External case 10 Gbps (equipped with Asmedia 235CM chipset), should be 10Gbit, unfortunately only makes 5Gbit. Even in today's new version 11.2.2, Apple has not fixed the problem, can they not or do they not want to?
I think that all known chipsets like Asm, Jmicron, Realtek etc. would have to be integrated in the Apple OS -- so that the firmware of these chipsets is known correctly and works with Apples OS like it should.
Or do the TB3 / USB-C connections on the M1 have a different revision than the last systems equipped with Intel and the error is therefore more profound?
Why is the manufacturer listed as: Space Keys? What a nonsense, it should be Asmedia (235CM) in my case! I also will send a bug report to Apple therefore.

//edit:
USB 3.2 Gen 2×1USB 3.1 Gen 2128b/132bNo10101.2SuperSpeed USB 10Gbps USB SuperSpeed 10 Gbps Trident Logo.svg

new Spfc. - old Spfc. - Apple
USB 3.1 Gen 2 (up to 10 Gbit/s) = both the same encoding

ASM235CM

USB3.2 Gen2x1 to SATA
 

Attachments

  • Bildschirmfoto 2021-02-23 um 18.09.06.png
    Bildschirmfoto 2021-02-23 um 18.09.06.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 258
Last edited:

adonis3k

macrumors 6502a
Apr 15, 2012
547
109
For the price/performance the Orico TB3 40GB/s is the best IMO....with 2TB Sabrent Rocket..

Screenshot 2021-02-27 at 20.30.34.png


The Orico USB4 is twice the price+ for not much more gain by the looks of other posts.
 

joevt

macrumors 604
Jun 21, 2012
6,974
4,262
I have an i-tec MySafe USB-C M.2 SATA Drive Metal External case 10 Gbps (equipped with Asmedia 235CM chipset), should be 10Gbit, unfortunately only makes 5Gbit. Even in today's new version 11.2.2, Apple has not fixed the problem, can they not or do they not want to?
The current work-around is to use a different enclosure or connect it to a USB or Thunderbolt hub or dock.

I think that all known chipsets like Asm, Jmicron, Realtek etc. would have to be integrated in the Apple OS -- so that the firmware of these chipsets is known correctly and works with Apples OS like it should.
USB is a standard. Apple should be able to follow the standard to make work any device that uses the standard.

Or do the TB3 / USB-C connections on the M1 have a different revision than the last systems equipped with Intel and the error is therefore more profound?
TB3/USB-C in the M1 has different hardware than in Intel. Therefore, it is also has different software. The problem could be in either the hardware or the software.

Why is the manufacturer listed as: Space Keys? What a nonsense, it should be Asmedia (235CM) in my case! I also will send a bug report to Apple therefore.
The manufacturer is stored in the USB device. It does not always correspond to the Vendor ID. For example, I have two USB products with Apple Inc. as the Vendor ID, but the Manufacturer for the older Apple device is "Apple Computer, Inc." instead of "Apple Inc.".
 
  • Like
Reactions: VillageBoy

Heatboy

macrumors member
Nov 16, 2018
41
20
Denmark
BTW, a review just came out of the OWC Envoy Pro FX TB3/USB3/4 drive, looks sweet:


quote:
"On a side note, I tested the Envoy Pro FX on both an M1 Mac mini (results shown), and a slightly older Intel iMac. If there are still any issues with USB drives being slower on the M1 or Big Sur, they didn’t show up. In fact, the M1 transfers were anywhere from 10 to 20 percent faster."
 

Corncab44

macrumors regular
Jun 22, 2020
233
62
What sort of speeds are folks getting with Samsung T5s using M1 MBAs? I understand the throttling discussed here is at a higher threshold, but I've seen reports of slower speeds even for less than top of the line SSDs. I have a few WD portable HDDs that are getting from 100 MB/s (a 2.5" My Passport) to a little under 200 MB/s (a 3.5" My Book). Was considering getting an SSD and the T5 is the most obvious, but wasn't sure if it would be throttled at all.
 

rJonze

macrumors newbie
Mar 3, 2021
7
6
What sort of speeds are folks getting with Samsung T5s using M1 MBAs? I understand the throttling discussed here is at a higher threshold, but I've seen reports of slower speeds even for less than top of the line SSDs. I have a few WD portable HDDs that are getting from 100 MB/s (a 2.5" My Passport) to a little under 200 MB/s (a 3.5" My Book). Was considering getting an SSD and the T5 is the most obvious, but wasn't sure if it would be throttled at all.
My new T5 gives a disappointing 308 write / ~360 read on m1 air. Its ~540 read on write on an intel Mac. The sandisk extreme pro v1 gives numbers in the low 800s on the air and it only costs about $30 US more.
 

Corncab44

macrumors regular
Jun 22, 2020
233
62
Just don't really have a need for the higher speeds on the t7 or sandisk equivalent, but I do want to get full advertised speeds on the t5. Unfortunately doesn't look like that's even remotely possible on an m1? More like 60% or thereabouts? Might return the t5 but not sure whose fault this is — Samsung's or Apples? Don't mind holding onto it since I got a good deal, but only if there's a fix in the works at some point.
 

jdb8167

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2008
4,867
4,603
Just don't really have a need for the higher speeds on the t7 or sandisk equivalent, but I do want to get full advertised speeds on the t5. Unfortunately doesn't look like that's even remotely possible on an m1? More like 60% or thereabouts? Might return the t5 but not sure whose fault this is — Samsung's or Apples? Don't mind holding onto it since I got a good deal, but only if there's a fix in the works at some point.
Seems likely to be a USB-C driver problem since people aren't seeing a slowdown on Thunderbolt. That makes it Apple's fault more than likely. It's also possible that it is fixable in software.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VillageBoy

cosmicpanther

macrumors newbie
May 1, 2020
9
5
Hi guy, just wondering if anyone has done a comparison between the Orico USB 4.0 and the Acasis USB 4.0 enclosures. They both seem to the same price on Ali express.
Acasis
Orico

Thanks in advance
 

mick2

macrumors 6502
Oct 5, 2017
251
237
UK
Just to return to the original issue of this thread...I have the same problem as the OP of only getting 5 Gb/s speeds when using a 10 Gb/s capable Samsung T5 SSD. These connection speeds are reported as 5 Gb/s in System Information.

However,

- This is using a 2020 i5 Intel MBA
- This is under Catalina
- I also have a StarTech USB3.1 gen 2 10Gb/s enclosure with an 860EVO SSD that also only connects to the MBA at 5Gb/s. This enclosure also connects to Win10 / Linux machines at 10Gb/s.

...all of which suggests that the problem is *not* specifically an M1, a T5 or a Big Sur issue.

Specifics: The drive is a Samsung T5 with latest firmware (1.6.7 iirc) and is rated as USB3.1 gen 2 10Gb/s. The drive connects at 10Gb/s speed on my Win10 and Linux machines. I'm connecting to the MBA with with the same original cables, and the speed is reported as only 5Gb/s in System Info. Speed tests confirm this (ie read/writes around 450MB/s).

I also have a Crucial X8 SSD - also rated as a USB3.1 gen 2 device - which connects to the MBA at the correct 10Gb/s.

My guess is its a case of recent Macs - both Intel and M1 - not supporting certain USB 3.1 gen 2 bridge chips correctly.
 
Last edited:

Carlson-online

macrumors 6502
May 27, 2004
357
1,118
Taking another luck at this - you are correct.

Below are shots from 2 different drives. One with a ASM controller, one with a jmicron one. I connected them to the same port on my m1, and used the same usb-c cable. Notice the ASM controller is the one that only connects at 5GB/s, so that's obviously where the issue lies.

This is after me just installing 11.2.3
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2021-03-13 at 15.54.25.png
    Screenshot 2021-03-13 at 15.54.25.png
    165 KB · Views: 213
  • Screenshot 2021-03-13 at 15.54.03.png
    Screenshot 2021-03-13 at 15.54.03.png
    141.5 KB · Views: 183
  • Like
Reactions: robotica and mick2

Corncab44

macrumors regular
Jun 22, 2020
233
62
Taking another luck at this - you are correct.

Below are shots from 2 different drives. One with a ASM controller, one with a jmicron one. I connected them to the same port on my m1, and used the same usb-c cable. Notice the ASM controller is the one that only connects at 5GB/s, so that's obviously where the issue lies.

This is after me just installing 11.2.3
So should a software fix be possible then?
 

cosmicpanther

macrumors newbie
May 1, 2020
9
5
Taking another luck at this - you are correct.

Below are shots from 2 different drives. One with a ASM controller, one with a jmicron one. I connected them to the same port on my m1, and used the same usb-c cable. Notice the ASM controller is the one that only connects at 5GB/s, so that's obviously where the issue lies.

This is after me just installing 11.2.3
I am not sure it's the entire problem. I did a quick speed test with a NVME ssd docked to a HP G2 thunderbolt dock and connected to the M1 MacBook Air directly. In both cases, the ssd is recognised as being capable of 10Gb/s but when I in the Blackmagic test, the speed is almost halved connected to the M1directly compared to when it is connected through the thunderbolt dock.

External SSD connected directly

SSD direct info.jpg SSD direct.jpg




External SSD connected through the thunderbolt 3 dock

SSD docked info.jpg SSD docked.jpg
 

albercook

macrumors newbie
Mar 20, 2021
4
0
For the price/performance the Orico TB3 40GB/s is the best IMO....with 2TB Sabrent Rocket..

View attachment 1736193

The Orico USB4 is twice the price+ for not much more gain by the looks of other posts.
Sorry, I'm not sure that I'm reading this correctly. So the speedometer numbers for write and read are 1819/2229 MB/s, but disk drives are rated in Gbps

MB/s = Megabytes per sec

Gbps = Gigabits per sec

8 bits = 1 byte

So the those convert roughly to 14.5 and 17.8 Gb/s. Are these on an M1 Air? That better than the specifications for the M1 Air? I googled BlackMagic speed tests for the internal drive on the M1 Air and they come in at 2600-3000MB/s or abound 20Gb/s so an external drive is 3/4 the speed of an internal drive? Did I get this right?
 
Last edited:

crevalic

Suspended
May 17, 2011
83
98
Sorry, I'm not sure that I'm reading this correctly. So the speedometer numbers for write and read are 1819/2229 MB/s, but disk drives are rated in Gbps

MB/s = Megabytes per sec

Gbps = Gigabits per sec

8 bits = 1 byte

So the those convert roughly to 14.5 and 17.8 Gb/s. Are these on an M1 Air? That better than the specifications for the M1 Air? I googled BlackMagic speed tests for the internal drive on the M1 Air and they come in at 2600-3000MB/s or abound 20Gb/s so an external drive is 3/4 the speed of an internal drive? Did I get this right?
Disk drives are absolutely not rated in bits per second, where are you getting this from? Except if you mean USB drives, but the Gbps in that case attempts to clarify what type of USB3 port is supported rather than indicating the speed of a drive. For example, USB 3.1 Gen 2 = USB 3.2 Gen 2x1 = SuperSpeed USB 10Gbps = USB 3.1 10GBps, with the last being currently most common in marketing materials. You can buy drives that support 10Gbps USB3 that vary in speeds from <100MB/s to slightly over 1GB/s, which will saturate the port. The whole point of this thread is that the drive Gbps ratings are especially useless on M1 Macs, since many drives will only connect with slower USB protocols than is supported, or will operate at significantly slower speeds than on PCs. As you've even seen yourself, when you searched for the rating of the internal drive, it was rated in MB/s not Mbps, which made your whole post trying to convert the external drive speeds from bytes to bits for comparison purposes completely unnecessary. Literally every single drive speed measurement tool and all drive marketing materials or specifications I have ever seen (and I've seen many, from many different companies), measure speed in bytes, not bits.

And to answer your question:
The absolute maximum data bus bandwidth of a TB3/4 port is 22Gbps, which can be reduced down to 8Gbps if the same cable/TB controller is used to connect to monitors. Therefore the absolutely maximum possible data transfer speed to a device connected to a TB3/4 port is 22Gbps/8=2.75GB/s or 2750MB/s. As you found out yourself, this is rather close to speeds of MBA's internal SSD and more generally, the rated speeds of currently most popular good PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe SSDs. So yes, with a high quality TB3 enclosure and a good NVMe drive inside it, you will be able to have your external drive reach read speeds close to 90-100% and write speeds 75-90% of those of thee internal drive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: adonis3k

joevt

macrumors 604
Jun 21, 2012
6,974
4,262
Here are some numbers:

AmorphousDiskMark gives higher numbers than Blackmagic Disk Speed Test. It shows that Thunderbolt can do over 24 Gbps (3000 MB/s).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.