Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

white7561

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2016
934
386
World
But @Fomalhaut is claiming his T5 runs at 10Gb/s, whereas mine doesn't. Are you suggesting that Samsung changed the bridge chip in their T5s at some point?
I don't think so. Usually they don't change those. But it's probably the firmware. Which is usually upgradeable. . my Strix Arion with ASM2362 has been upgraded last year.
 

mick2

macrumors 6502
Oct 5, 2017
251
237
UK
I don't think so. Usually they don't change those. But it's probably the firmware. Which is usually upgradeable. . my Strix Arion with ASM2362 has been upgraded last year.
So we'd need to know what f/w @Fomalhaut has on his T5. I'm running the latest from Samsung, but my T5 has only run at 5gb/s on my Macs since I've had it, across several f/w versions.

Fwiw I don't think it's a f/w issue; I think that Apple have a quirks plist (or equivalent) in place that for some reason downgrades certain USB chipsets to 5gb/s operation, and that they just don't publicise or acknowledge the fact.

It would be good if Fomalhaut gets back with more details of his setup and confirmation of his 10Gb/s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery

white7561

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2016
934
386
World
So we'd need to know what f/w @Fomalhaut has on his T5. I'm running the latest from Samsung, but my T5 has only run at 5gb/s on my Macs since I've had it, across several f/w versions.

Fwiw I don't think it's a f/w issue; I think that Apple have a quirks plist (or equivalent) in place that for some reason downgrades certain USB chipsets to 5gb/s operation, and that they just don't publicise or acknowledge the fact.

It would be good if Fomalhaut gets back with more details of his setup and confirmation of his 10Gb/s.
Yeah but if it's a quirk settings. Shouldn't all T5 connects at 5gb/s? . Unless it is using a different or upgraded bridge chip inside the T5.
 

mick2

macrumors 6502
Oct 5, 2017
251
237
UK
Yeah but if it's a quirk settings. Shouldn't all T5 connects at 5gb/s? . Unless it is using a different or upgraded bridge chip inside the T5.
Yes, this is correct. I'm predicting that when other T5 Mac users actually look at the connection speed in System Report their T5s will all be running at 5Gb/s. If not, my Quirks theory is wrong and the issue is more subtle than we think...!
 
  • Like
Reactions: white7561

white7561

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2016
934
386
World
Yes, this is correct. I'm predicting that when other T5 Mac users actually look at the connection speed in System Report their T5s will all be running at 5Gb/s. If not, my Quirks theory is wrong and the issue is more subtle than we think...!
Yep if there are others with 10gbps link speed. That means it's either firmware differences or just a different chip altogether.
 

anonymous888

macrumors member
Nov 24, 2018
81
56
India
Yes, this is correct. I'm predicting that when other T5 Mac users actually look at the connection speed in System Report their T5s will all be running at 5Gb/s. If not, my Quirks theory is wrong and the issue is more subtle than we think...!
I posted before. My NVME Enclosure is connected at 10GBPS and I get around ~720MBps write.
When I use a 5GBPS cable I only get ~320MBps.
My SSD is WD SN750.
 
  • Like
Reactions: white7561

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,979
1,718
Any chance you could test and confirm 100%? As none of this is documented/acknowledged by Apple, we're somewhat groping around in the dark trying to nail the issue, so hardware / os details and confirmation via testing are especially useful.
Here it is on my MBP16. I'm travelling at the moment so can't test on the M1 Mini, but I'm pretty sure it connects at 10Gbs. I may have posted images on an earlier post in this thread; let me check!

T5.png



[Edit: It's entirely possible that I'm wrong about the T5 connecting at 10Gbps directly on the M1 Mini, because I often use it via a TB3 hub..which does connect at 10Gbps. The Samsung T7 definitely connects directly at 10Gbps.

I can't recall feeling disappointed by the T5's speed as I was with another USB 3.1Gen2 enclosure than only connects directly at 5Gbps on the M1 Mini.

Unfortunately, I can't check this for another 2 months... ]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mick2 and white7561

mick2

macrumors 6502
Oct 5, 2017
251
237
UK
Here it is on my MBP16. I'm travelling at the moment so can't test on the M1 Mini, but I'm pretty sure it connects at 10Gbs. I may have posted images on an earlier post in this thread; let me check!
Thanks for that - very helpful. What year is your MBP16 from?

I can't recall feeling disappointed by the T5's speed as I was with another USB 3.1Gen2 enclosure than only connects directly at 5Gbps on the M1 Mini.
<snip>
The speed difference between the T5 connecting at 5Gb/s and 10Gb/s is pretty minor - ~440MB/s vs ~520MB/s on sustained read/writes...so you'd probably not notice unless you were looking. This is because the T5 is limited to SATA speeds.

The 5Gb/s vs 10Gb/s issue has much more impact when it affects drives and enclosures using NVME disks.
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,979
1,718
Thanks for that - very helpful. What year is your MBP16 from?


The speed difference between the T5 connecting at 5Gb/s and 10Gb/s is pretty minor - ~440MB/s vs ~520MB/s on sustained read/writes...so you'd probably not notice unless you were looking. This is because the T5 is limited to SATA speeds.

The 5Gb/s vs 10Gb/s issue has much more impact when it affects drives and enclosures using NVME disks.
The MBP is late 2019.

I recall the T5 being significantly slower on the M1 Mini - about 25-30% slower than on the MBP16, and the same applied to every SSD I own (about 6 of them). This is even when connecting at 10Gbps with SATA disks that are not bottlenecked by the interface. At 5Gbps I recall some quite disappointing numbers in BM speed test - some even below 300MB/s. Maybe a couple got over 400MB/s. I wish I'd written down all the results!

No doubt some numbers will emerge over the next few weeks.

If it can get c. 900MB/s read/write with a Samsung T7, I'll be happy. On my M1 Mini I think I was getting 720-750MB/s write and reads a bit faster. It was certainly fast enough for my video files, but every little bit helps :)
 

Love-hate 🍏 relationship

macrumors 68040
Sep 19, 2021
3,055
3,235
I would definitely contact Apple about this, because that is seriously misleading. This is early days, though, there still could be some kind of OS-level issue going on.
i did ,and they dont give a **** ,even with a serious letter they dont care,problem is i cant really show any absolute evidence.currently im seeking for someone who has made torough tests,better be scientific or known website.lemme know if u find,imma tryna sue them again,that is unnacceptable
 

white7561

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2016
934
386
World
Here's my speed using Asus ROG Strix Arion NVMe Enclosure (ASM2362 chip inside) with an Addlink S70 1TB SSD (Phison E12S Controller) tested on the MacBook Pro 16" 2021 with M1 Pro.

Screen Shot 2021-11-10 at 12.34.08 PM.png


Pretty good speed IMO. Also if you're wondering why it says the device is SSI M.2 NVME SSD, It's because the latest ASM2362 firmware has the naming things broken. So on the firmware flasher program even if i set it to match the Asus ROG one like before it won't change the name.. The firmware is good and stable though so i think it's fine.

Also another note, that Asus DOESN'T provide regular firmware updates for this enclosure !! But, since it's using the same ASM2362 controller like others. It works just fine on the Strix Arion.
 

white7561

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2016
934
386
World
Pretty good. But it's missing 13% performance compared to an Intel Mac. Or maybe even compared to a Thunderbolt 3 port of a Thunderbolt 3 dock connected to an M1 Mac?
I don't know. Don't have either :p I might go with thunderbolt 3 enclosure if I need the speed. But idk. Should I even wait for USB 4/Thunderbolt 4 enclosure?
 

white7561

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2016
934
386
World
No. Choose if you want 1060 MB/s USB (880 MB/s on M1) or 2800 MB/s Thunderbolt then get an enclosure and SSD that will do that.
The USB option will be much less expensive and the USB limit means you don't need a super fast NVMe.
Yeh. I was wondering if USB 4 40gbps vs thunderbolt 3 and 4 for external SSD make a difference since all of em are 40gbps.
 

joevt

macrumors 604
Jun 21, 2012
6,938
4,239
Yeh. I was wondering if USB 4 40gbps vs thunderbolt 3 and 4 for external SSD make a difference since all of em are 40gbps.
40 Gbps is 5000 MB/s. We know Thunderbolt 3 can do 4867 MB/s of DisplayPort to an Apple Pro Display XDR but PCIe is limited to ≈3000 MB/s for reasons.

If someone can make an enclosure for Thunderbolt 3/4/USB4 that can do more than 3000 MB/s then you'll hear about it here, otherwise you'll have to wait for Thunderbolt 5/USB5.
 

white7561

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2016
934
386
World
40 Gbps is 5000 MB/s. We know Thunderbolt 3 can do 4867 MB/s of DisplayPort to an Apple Pro Display XDR but PCIe is limited to ≈3000 MB/s for reasons.

If someone can make an enclosure for Thunderbolt 3/4/USB4 that can do more than 3000 MB/s then you'll hear about it here, otherwise you'll have to wait for Thunderbolt 5/USB5.
Tbh thunderbolt 3 enclosure should be fine with gen 3x4 SSDs. The speeds tested on the Mac are usually tested using black magic tho so we dont know the max speed like if you were to test it using AmorphousDiskMark
 

joevt

macrumors 604
Jun 21, 2012
6,938
4,239
Should be. But some gen 3x4 SSDs behave strangely in Thunderbolt enclosures (write speed is reduced to sub 1000 MB/s). gen 4 SSDs usually don't have that problem.
Actually, this YouTube video has a test where the gen 4 SN850 has bad behaviour for write speed (M1 and Intel):
Seems like a good video including USB-C and Thunderbolt tests, AmorphousDiskMark synthetic tests, large file copy tests, export times, and notes about SSD cache for longer writes.

The read speeds are getting really close to 25 Gbps (not an insignificant increase over the original description of 22 Gbps for Thunderbolt 3).
 

Norbex

macrumors newbie
Nov 30, 2021
3
0
I'm using a M1-chip MBP and to test it with Sandisk E61 directly attached (see pic 1), the actual speed falls into between 630-650MB/s both on read and written.

Sandisk E61 supports USB 3.2 gen2. So I guess the issue hasn't been fixed yet on M1 machines to date?
截屏2021-12-02 11.51.28.png



截屏2021-12-02 11.49.08.png
 

400

macrumors 6502a
Sep 12, 2015
760
319
Wales
Completely in the dark here and reading many threads has just frazzled my brain and not sure what I am looking at, new thread or drop this Q in here?
M1 iMac.
I have now, a Crucial P2 2tb in a Orico USB3.1 Gen 2 case (TCM2-C3). (plan was to pick up a TB one when I see a deal).
If I use the Apple supplied C-C cable it is way worse. This is the cable as per Orico box. System report says 10gbs connection (up to).

What have I done wrong is the first question. This I the same on any port on the rear.

Screenshot 2021-12-03 at 12.53.52.png



Edit. By the power of grey skull!
Re formated, encryption off this time.
External USB3.0 : Apple M1.png
 
Last edited:

Stussi

macrumors newbie
Jun 9, 2017
11
4
Seems this issue hasn't been discussed in all those Youtube Videos covering the M1 Pro / Max..

I've got the SanDisk portable SSD, 2TB with 1050MB/s and the 2000MB/s version each. The 2000MB/s version isn't much faster on the M1 Max...

1050MB/s Version:
Sandisk 1050.png


2000MB/s Version:
Sandisk 2000.png


Will post some Intel comparison later.
 

wytwolf

macrumors 6502
Apr 23, 2012
256
75
Seems this issue hasn't been discussed in all those Youtube Videos covering the M1 Pro / Max..

I've got the SanDisk portable SSD, 2TB with 1050MB/s and the 2000MB/s version each. The 2000MB/s version isn't much faster on the M1 Max...

1050MB/s Version:
View attachment 1923790

2000MB/s Version:
View attachment 1923791

Will post some Intel comparison later.
The 2000MBps version is a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 which has already been reported no supported by apple. Hence the reason why the 1050MBps is almost the same as the 2000MBps version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fomalhaut

Stussi

macrumors newbie
Jun 9, 2017
11
4
Thanks for the heads-up on that. Didn't know that, thought USB4 includes this.. in my use case the speed is no problem.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.