What is your mac model? Seems M1 pro and max chips do not have the same issues as the base M1.
Is this the general consensus??
M1 Max and M1 Pro chips should not exhibit such behaviour?
What is your mac model? Seems M1 pro and max chips do not have the same issues as the base M1.
I think my 14" Pro is little faster than my M1 Mac Mini but not by a whole lot. I think it depends more on the controller used by the ext SSD's. Both lag behind my 2018 Intel Mac Mini I used to have. See my post above you.Is this the general consensus??
M1 Max and M1 Pro chips should not exhibit such behaviour?
I remember reading that in the acasis website when I was about to buy it, but I cannot find it now. But also from looking around in posts/testimonials it does seem so.Is this the general consensus??
M1 Max and M1 Pro chips should not exhibit such behaviour?
ioreg -filrtw0 -n pcie-xhci > ioreg_MacStudioAsm3142.txt
ioreg
to find the correct one.Sorry in advance for not completely reading through all the pages of this post.So I got the ACASIS USB4.0 Mobile M.2 Nvme Enclosure today and I installed my 1TB ADATA XPG SX8200.
Speeds are much less than I was expecting. Write speeds often dip below 1000MB/s.
I tried with both a Belkin TB3, and the included ACASIS TB3 cable, no difference.
View attachment 1718663
I have a hypothesis for your results based on extensive testing: Certain controllers perform worse with M1 macs. For example, the JM based controllers are much slower with the TB4 ports. The USBc front ports are based on ASM. Could xplains #1 result if the sandisk controller was an older model. The Studio front USB ports have one PCIe lane, which limits the bandwidth. The sandisk pro could have a more compatible controller which explains the faster speed with the TB4 port.I tested an iMac Pro & Studio M1 Max (with front USB-C ports):
BlackMagic speed test:
1. SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD (v1) USB3.1 Gen 2 (model DSSDE60)
- iMac Pro TB3 = W490 R520
- Studio TB4 = W420 R390
- Studio USB-C = W490 R520
This is baffling why the Studio's TB4 is slowest.
2. SanDisk Extreme PRO Portable SSD (v2) USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (model SDSSDE81)
- iMac Pro TB3 = W960 R960
- Studio TB4 port = W970 R920
- Studio USB-C = W820 R750
This is baffling why the Studio's Front USB-C is slowest.
Never got a resolution to this. I ended up just putting that SX8200 into a laptop (which I actually already sold).Sorry in advance for not completely reading through all the pages of this post.
I also got a adata SX8200 pro 2TB new replacement with the slower controller and got about 1200 W/R speeds, similar to yours using blackmagic. Tried several TB3 enclosures and very minor differences. Put it in a Windows laptop, and got 1700 read, 1300 write using crystaldiskmark,. This is about half the speed expected. Did you ever resolve the issue? I ended up RMA this to Adata.
If I have a Late 2014 iMac 5K with a USB 3.0 Bus listed in System Information, what speed might I get from this here drive would you know?Could be related to USB4 vs. USB 3.x spec.
USB 3.1 Gen 10 GB is I think multi-lane (2x 5GB lanes - it's also called USB 3.1 Gen 2x2 for 10 GB I think), maybe USB4 is not.
USB4 is very similar to thunderbolt, and it may not work in a backwards compatible way with USB3.x in multi-lane.
Which means a single lane at USB 3.x will only get you 5 gigabit, despite the USB4 interface being faster (in a single lane) - but only when running in "USB 4" mode with a USB4 device.
Would also explain why you get full speed through the dock - you're going thunderbolt to another USB 3.x controller on the dock which DOES operate in multi-lane mode.
edit:
And I agree. the USB naming standards are deliberately designed by committee to cause confusion - so that OEMs can sell last year's product as "USB 3.2" or whatever with the original spec from USB 3.0.
The names don't just not make sense - they have actually re-named the same spec to a later version with a "gen1" on it.
i.e., if I recall properly, USB 3.2 gen1 is actually the exact same thing as USB 3.0. And USB 3.1 gen1.
Amazon linked page says 440MB/second, less than USB 3.0 bus speed, so 440 MB/secIf I have a Late 2014 iMac 5K with a USB 3.0 Bus listed in System Information, what speed might I get from this here drive would you know?
Thank you for this information. Great news!Amazon linked page says 440MB/second, less than USB 3.0 bus speed, so 440 MB/sec
I doubt it. This has been a recurrent issue for ever with macs and usb (and other) controllers. It is absurd because we are talking about huge companies and products that are often marketed for macs, but well.Almost come to the end of 2022, so how's the speed issue resolved till now?
Any update on M2 chip?
My experience is quite different. With my previous Macs with TB3 (MBP 2017 with Touchbar and a few more) I had multiple TB3 docks, from Belkin ("TB3 Express"), Elgato ("TB3") and another I can't recall. On all Macs all docks had identical behaviour: RJ45 Ethernet 50:50 chance of being permanently lost after unplugging the dock and plugging it in again until a reboot of the Mac (the Mac would claim no cable connected), 4k display turning off and on again for a moment and so on.In general, it seems that thunderbolt works much more reliably than pure usb hubs/enclosures etc.
USB3.1 Hub :
Product ID: 0x0822
Vendor ID: 0x2109 (VIA Labs, Inc.)
Version: 90.13
Serial Number: 000000001
Speed: Up to 10 Gb/s
Which benchmark?M1 Mac mini USB-A - USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps)
Black Magic.Which benchmark?
Tech specs says M1 Mac mini has 5 Gbps USB-A ports.
Check the USB hierarchy. It seems the hub's USB-A ports might from a child hub of the hub that controls the USB-C ports.
I think you'll get better results from a Thunderbolt 3 dock since it won't use USB tunnelling like Thunderbolt 4 docks use.
Need a test from an Intel Mac to see the max of the T7 to show how much is lost with the M1.
I would use AmorphousDiskMark.app since it usually gives higher numbers and therefore shows more closely what the bandwidth limit is.Black Magic.
USB 5 Gbps is actually 4 Gbps since it uses 8b/10b encoding.That alone may explain it, since the USB-C speed is double the Mac mini’s USB-A speed
I would use AmorphousDiskMark.app since it usually gives higher numbers and therefore shows more closely what the bandwidth limit is.
Were these drives encrypted? It makes a big difference in the sequential performance. For instance, here's a 2 TB Kingston XS2000 plugged into the TB3 port on my 2019 iMac, before encryption:Samsung T7 Shield 2 TB tests - This drive is 10 Gbps, and rated for 1050 MB/s read. APFS formatted.
M1 Mac mini + Plugable TB4/USB4 Hub - USB-C:
View attachment 2119965
M1 Mac mini + Plugable TB4/USB4 Hub - USB-A:
View attachment 2119966
M1 Mac mini direct USB-C (Plugable hub not connected):
View attachment 2119969
M1 Mac mini direct USB-A (Plugable hub not connected):
View attachment 2119967
M1 Mac mini direct USB-A (Plugable hub connected to Mac mini USB-C, but Samsung drive not attached to hub):
View attachment 2119970
M1 Mac mini 1 TB (Ventura) internal SSD:
View attachment 2119968
Both USB-C 10 Gbps and USB-A 5 Gbps on my 5 year-old Kaby Lake iMac are much faster than on my M1 Mac mini.
Core i5-7600 iMac (Monterey) direct USB-C:
View attachment 2119972
Core i5-7600 iMac (Monterey) direct USB-A:
a View attachment 2119971
Unencrypted APFS. Default test settings.Were these drives encrypted? It makes a big difference in the sequential performance. For instance, here's a 2 TB Kingston XS2000 plugged into the TB3 port on my 2019 iMac, before encryption:
View attachment 2120451
And after encryption:
View attachment 2120453
Also, I believe there's something wrong with the measurement you made of the 1 TB internal SSD on your M1 Mini. 33.20 MB/s is much too slow for 4k random writes with queue depth = 1 (figure at lower R). Here are measurements made on my 2019iMac (Monterey 12.4). Without encryption, I got ~420 MB/s, and with encryption I got ~275 MB/s.
View attachment 2120459