My suggestion would be go for 16" M1Max which has 32Gb base which means your graphics work is super fast and a 1Tb SSD but if you can.. push that to 2Tb as graphics and video are space consuming. If you go for 1Tb you can have an external 4Tb SSD connected super fast and dramatically cheaper than the Apple upgrade cost. If you can buy it as a business item so you can reclaim sale/VAT etc. Sell your old one as soon as you can do without it.
Hmm. Thing is I really don’t believe I’ll benefit that much from getting the best available but I might of course be wrong.
My current computer (MBP15” from 2015, with 2,5 GHz and 16 GB memory) is handling 3D modeling quite fine. I mean I experience some lag, an occasional freeze etc and of course one of the reasons for upgrading to a new computer is to try to avoid these issues but I would assume even the cheapest 16” (maybe even cheapest 14”) even without any BTO should be able out perform my 6.5 year old MacBook Pro. It just seems quite extremely overkill with that particular model. Especially since it costs $5000 in my country (MBP 16” with 1 TB storage and 32 GB RAM). Might have been a but unclear about that both music production and 3D-Modeling are just hobbies and even if some part of my work there is aloe it won’t affect my income etc and therefore I’m not that disturbed by it (at least if the part / part of workflow that is slow, isn’t something I have to do repeatedly whenever I do music production or 3D-modeling).
I’m kind of trying to think about the upgrade like this: I have my MBP15” from mid 2015, therefore all computer launched today should be faster and “better” than what I currently got. I don’t know what expectations to set for myself really, but for example maybe I’d would be reasonable to think that the cheapest 14” would benefit me in a such as in that it will be twice as “good” as my current one overall performance and maybe three times as fast as my current MBP’s CPU but only 50% faster GPU, if I would decide on the the one you me Rhône’s maybe it would be three times as overall good as my current director MBP, three times as fast as my CPU but also three times as fast as my GPU....
What the.. I don’t even know what I’m talking about anymore. I’m so tired after not sleeping more than a few hours these last few days so sorry about kh fkndusion and also I’m nervous and stressed about these computers. Should have tried to better understand what I needed before. Just thought there would be more or less one or two alternatives that I could afford and that would be kind of obvious choices but I feel I have no idea what the specs axrhakkr mean or what I need.
Sadly I have no company anymore so can not write off the expense either but thanks for suggesting it in case I didn’t think of it missed it :/.
Edit: found something that I’m not sure help me understand how much faster the new ones are but I noticed there was a geekbench score for the M1 Max posted in MacRumors front page and it was:
1749
Single-Core Score
11542
Multi-Core Score
While when I searched for my current computer I found this score:
875
Single-Core Score
2955
Multi-Core Score
Now I have a hard time seeing myself spending all that cash for the M1 Max unless there’s a damn good reason for me to do so. I think it’s much more likely that I go for one of the variants of the M1 Pro and I’m not sure whenever Geek Bench results for that will be posted or I’d I somehow can calculate an estimate based on the one I posted above but still some conclusion should be possible to find in it. Right?... I mean single core performance is about twice as high or 1000 points higher in the new machines and multi core is about 4x higher. Never was interested in geek bench so maybe I just don’t know how to read it.