What is it?You may wanna read up on what breitbart.com really is...
What is it?
Fair enough . I have not been aware of it.Not a source of reliable information, if that's what you were going for...
To put it in tech terms, its the wccftech of conservative news. Basically they push conspiracy theories and are very anti-civil rights.What is it?
What is it?
Not a source of reliable information, if that's what you were going for...
Well if you don't know what Breibart is, that would explain why I don't take any of your cut and paste from blogs strategy seriously...Whats wrong with it?
No indication for mac pro.
Addition to previous information about absurdity of Intel managment...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...cation-and-talent-to-fund-feminist-frequency/
Just out of curiosity, have anyone of you claiming the site unreliable really read the article in the first place, to even check if it(the article) is reliable?
I am asking, because FUDzilla have had the same type of reputation. But lately they have very reliable information, especially the ones coming from backstage(especially when it comes to AMD).
Thats why I do have open mind, about information in the sites, because they can have access to very delicate information. And the key here is to get them out, from typical blubbery.
As it stands, what we have with Kaby Lake desktop is effectively Sandy Bridge polished to within an inch of its life, a once-groundbreaking CPU architecture hacked, and tweaked, and mangled into ever-smaller manufacturing processes and power envelopes. Where the next major leap in desktop computing power comes from is still up for debate—but if Kaby Lake is any indication, it won't be coming from Intel.
I suggest following the information they provided, about Vega months before any preview of architecture, and how it turned out in reality. Thats first example, easiest one to validate.That's called: Confirmation Bias and it's a fallacy...
I'm all for AMD succeeding in this extremely uncompetitive environment and all, but WTF was that?
Quote of the day.You know guys what is the saddest thing? We can talk about what Intel, AMD, Nvidia will offer, but we have absolutely no clue whether Apple cares about it, at all.
Thats why I genuinely think that pretty much any hardware news is irrelevant in the context of Apple computers.
I suggest following the information they provided, about Vega months before any preview of architecture, and how it turned out in reality. Thats first example, easiest one to validate.
But hey, you are the expert here and knows better than they do.
Thats transaltes on more earnings on each mac sold, not on cheaper macs...Not Mac Pro related, but Intel released Kaby Lake CPUs. And they have lower prices .
7700T costs 272$ compared to 359 for 6700T. 7700 costs the same amount - 272$ compared to 329$ for 6700. And finally 7700K costs 305$ compared to 359$.
Finally the prices have dropped a bit.
I'm all for AMD succeeding in this extremely uncompetitive environment and all, but WTF was that?
Seriously, who's in charge of AMD's marketing coming up with these stupid names and campaigns? First it was "ryzen" and now this?
That has to be the lamest video announcing "groundbreaking" technology... a ****ing kid walking down a road playing a drum and then encountering a warehouse with stacked drums. I know they're making a metaphor, but ****ing drums???
The worst part of the video is the "Make some noise" part...
The redeeming factor to all of this is that stock AMD Radeon cards are the only GFX cards with good industrial design. The things nVidia makes compared to AMD reminds me of cheesy import cars with huge spoilers.
You're right. Apple has been pissing me off so much that now ranting has become a habit in my lifeHal 9000 looks like the top of maybe the next cylinder MacPro
Guys, have you checked lower end prices, for example Intel Pentium CPUs?
2C/4T setups, with very high core clocks. And BARGAIN price. Check this out: http://ark.intel.com/products/97143/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G4560-3M-Cache-3_50-GHz
3.5 GHz, 2C/4T, and 64$! Intel just cleaned up AMD in this price range. Think about it. GTX 1050, plus this CPU and you have extremely capable budget computer! CPU, mobo, 8 GB of RAM can cost you around 130$, GPU 109$, SSD its up to anyone how much they need the performance and space. For under 300$ you can have extremely capable, basic computer.
Now, lets wait for Ryzen in consumer space.