Looks fine to me with font smoothing on or off. "WARNING" is a little alarmist don't you think?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It worked for me. Before I upgraded my 2012 iMac I installed Mojave on an external drive. I enabled the feature with the command. I then took screenshots of some black text on white background in Text Edit. When I examined the screenshots zoomed in I saw the color fringes.
I have not as of yet enabled it on my internal drive which I upgraded to Mojave. I do have the non subpixel anti aliasing enabled.
I already took screengrabs and posted them. The command brings back subpixel rendering.
The vast majority of pro (Eizo, Nec etc) external monitors for photo editing are non-retina.
For me the best macOS experience doesn’t require a laptop. If I wanted a laptop that would be at the very least a secondary machine. I have worked on desktops and multiple monitors for years and that’s not gonna change anytime soon. So no, I don’t think Apple should be focusing only on retina screens, cause obviously I’m not an isolated case!
Irrational scaremongering.
Your headline almost induces fight-or-flight response in people, while in fact the issue is mildly concerning.
Your headline almost induces fight-or-flight response in people, while in fact the issue is mildly concerning.
It can be incredibly jarring. Personally I think it is a big deal.
That is actually the problem! To use a "retina" display in a desktop setting the only way to do this is the super expensive LG UltraFine 5K Display. But this works only with 2017 iMac/iMac Pro and with 2016 and newer MBPs....
Above, monospace font Courier, and variable width San Francisco, seen in menu bar.
Heavy font smoothing turned on. Taken on 13 inch non retina MBP.
Fonts look better than they ever had.
Yes, it is a fix.
Stop lying to people that they will be forever stuck with jaggy fonts on non retina screens if they upgrade to Mojave, because that simply isn't true. What is true is that making your fonts look as they did on High Sierra require you to copy and paste a command line into the Terminal, and once you do that, the fonts antialiasing is back.
I guess you haven’t bothered actually reading the full thread, as just a few posts ago I stated running that command brings back subpixel antialiasing and I even posted screengrabs to illustrate that.
Last edited:
What is that magic fix that you have and I don't?
I am using: defaults write -g CGFontRenderingFontSmoothingDisabled -bool NO
Actually, I shouldn't have directed my reply at you, but everyone else responsible for the amount of scaremongering in this thread.
Both are Mojave. The one with the coloured fringing is after the terminal command was applied.
[doublepost=1538410760][/doublepost]
Sorry, no magic fix. Same fix. I misinterpreted your last post with the screengrab.
Last edited:
I am still on HS, and on a non-retina (2560x1440) screen, but the impact of Apple disabling subpixel font smoothing is already a problem here. If you use Preview, subpixel font smoothing is already disabled. As an example: Here Preview is on left (subpixel AA inactive), Adobe DC on right (subpixel AA active):
It becomes even more glaring when you have small text: subpixel AA (right) has more contrast and easier to read.
Here is a zoom in on the same words: Note the difference the AA makes!
Finally, others may NOT be able to tell, but on a 21 inch retina iMac running HS, I can tell the difference between font rendering in Preview (no subpixel AA) and Adobe DC (subpixel AA). The latter is slightly sharper - especially for smaller font sizes.
Thus I think this is a significant regression that alters clarity for all Mac users.
It becomes even more glaring when you have small text: subpixel AA (right) has more contrast and easier to read.
Here is a zoom in on the same words: Note the difference the AA makes!
Finally, others may NOT be able to tell, but on a 21 inch retina iMac running HS, I can tell the difference between font rendering in Preview (no subpixel AA) and Adobe DC (subpixel AA). The latter is slightly sharper - especially for smaller font sizes.
Thus I think this is a significant regression that alters clarity for all Mac users.
Last edited:
Subpixel AA is active in most of HS. I can't speak for all apps though. In your case seems to be an app issue.
No, Preview being horrible has nothing to do with sub pixel anti-aliasing.
Microsoft open sourced their patents. Could this save OS X fonts? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18184830
Subpixel anti-aliasing is definitely not active in Preview on either a non-retina mac mini, or a 4K retina iMac. It is currently still active in the rest of the OS as far as I can tell. Can someone show me an example where subpixel AA is working in HS? I'd love to have it back!
[doublepost=1539278447][/doublepost]
What makes you say that?
[doublepost=1539278659][/doublepost]Here is a Print to PDF of this webpage viewed in Preview (Left) and AdobeDC (right):
Same PDF file. Only AdobeDC displays the subpixel AA.
Just take a screen shot of any section of text on the OS-menu bar etc. It's there.
Highly unlikely, though. Once Apple makes a decision they rarely backtrack, especially for OSX.
Normal non subpixel anti-aliased text doesn't look as bad as in Preview. Just try to write for example a document in Pages, export to pdf and open it in Preview.
It seems Preview doesn't even try to align text to the pixels.