This is why function changes like this should be created as an option. Old way/new way, my choice.Same. If I folded my arms I would sometimes end up with a different watch face. Maybe I’m just folding my arms wrong, though 😄
This is why function changes like this should be created as an option. Old way/new way, my choice.Same. If I folded my arms I would sometimes end up with a different watch face. Maybe I’m just folding my arms wrong, though 😄
I occasionally find that I’ve hit a corner complication by accident, but I’m glad that I don’t have to long-press to use complications. Knock on wood.I'm a big fan of the change in OS10. I don't know how I was doing it, but I was one of those folks that used to accidentally change watch faces on a regular basis. That problem is now gone for me in OS10.
It’s a good point, and easily added with an update!This is why function changes like this should be created as an option. Old way/new way, my choice.
I wanted to do this yesterday but watchOS 10 isn't an option in the software dropdown yet, so I worry it won't be seen properly.Everyone unhappy with this change, please leave feedback
Feedback - Watch
Apple wants to hear from you. Send us your comments and feedback about Apple Watch.www.apple.com
Not sure how easy it is to add the option to turn side swipe on/off. I only took coding class in high school, but remember adding options increased programming complexity quite a lot.It’s a good point, and easily added with an update!
This isn't a fundamental upgrade. They changed some of the fonts and graphical elements and changed some button functions but I can still get around. My only complaint is the subject of the thread. What makes it harder for you to use?While I’m not a fan of the new face swiping method, I have to say that my disappointment with it pales in comparison to my general distaste for WatchOS 10.
Overall this feels like change for change’s sake: to wit, there’s nothing about it that makes my AWU1 easier to use or more efficient. In fact, I find it to be quite the opposite.
Perhaps in time I’ll grow accustomed to it (not though I have a choice), but for now I’m less than impressed.
Regards,
Adam
It shouldn't be too much of a lift. They have the code for doing it the old way so it seems it would just be a matter of switching to one routine or the other.Not sure how easy it is to add the option to turn side swipe on/off. I only took coding class in high school, but remember adding options increased programming complexity quite a lot.
This theory made sense for about a minute, but then I realized that there's no need for Apple to take side swipes away from the faces view in order to make it available for use in apps.Ever since I heard they eliminated swiping to change the face, I wondered why TF, but hadn’t heard a reason, nor had I heard any new use for side swipes.
I just happened to notice that the new weather app allows you to swipe left/right to see the next page (this is different than scrolling up/down with the crown).
So, I think that’s Apple’s intent with this change - allow devs to use it within their apps.
I’m not saying I like the change, because it’s driving me crazy so far. And it’s not really even a better experience in the weather app than using the page switching menu at upper right.
But I sure hope side swipes end up doing something more useful in the long run to make this worth it.
Oh damn you’re right.This theory made sense for about a minute, but then I realized that there's no need for Apple to take side swipes away from the faces view in order to make it available for use in apps.
The first thing the feedback page asks is what version of watchOS you're using...We all need to tell Apple this!
Feedback - Watch
Apple wants to hear from you. Send us your comments and feedback about Apple Watch.www.apple.com
I can speak for myself, but several of the app updates have taken a page that had multiple things on them that could be scanned at a glance, and moved that stuff each onto a separate page. Let's take Fitness for example. Previously, when you first opened Fitness you were shown essentially a summary page, showing your rings and you could scroll down to see the status of all three of them on the same screen. It was all seamless on one "page," letting you scroll down without interruption.This isn't a fundamental upgrade. They changed some of the fonts and graphical elements and changed some button functions but I can still get around. My only complaint is the subject of the thread. What makes it harder for you to use?
I can speak for myself, but several of the app updates have taken a page that had multiple things on them that could be scanned at a glance, and moved that stuff each onto a separate page. Let's take Fitness for example. Previously, when you first opened Fitness you were shown essentially a summary page, showing your rings and you could scroll down to see the status of all three of them on the same screen. It was all seamless on one "page," letting you scroll down without interruption.
Now when you open Fitness, you only see the rings. Then when you "scroll" you actually switch to another page with a dissolve/dip-to-black/transition that breaks things up. But the next page only shows the status of Move. Then you have to switch to another page with the dissolve to see Exercise, and again to see Stand.
So whereas before you could just scroll down a bit to quickly see the status of all three, now you need to go through 4 pages one by one with a transition breaking up and "interrupting" each piece of data/page. This seems to be a new design language across many apps for watchOS 10.
The Carrot weather app also took one scrollable screen of data and broke it out into multiple discrete pages with transitions between each.
Like switching faces, they've taken stuff that was quicker and simpler and made it slightly more cumbersome, making accessing or doing the same thing take more steps that take longer.