Can you articulate how much faster the Studio is than the Mac Pro? 50% faster or......
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
❔ What computer is your Mac Studio replacing? ❔
- Thread starter sonicthehedgefrog
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
2011 3.4gHz i7 27" iMac with 16GB RAM, 1TB HDD and 250GB SSD which I bought nearly new from the refurb store in late 2011. It came without SSD and with only 4GB RAM. I upgraded those things myself (remember when you could do that?). It's been an absolute soldier. Something tells me my Studio won't still be working as well as my iMac is in 11 years' time, if at all.
On another board that I frequent, it was very recently suggested that Affinity Photo does focus stacking very well, and is AS-native. Have you had any experience with that?
Mine is replacing my 2012 27" iMac (which had to have the hard drive replaced twice over the last 5 years, but otherwise served me quite well for 10 years. Hoping I get 10 years out of this one. So far I am very happy.
Would love to hear about how the jump is for you, as well as what kind of work you do? I'm coming from a similar machine. I'm guessing from the VEGA FE that you're doing some kind of graphics or video work? (I'm in audio, but also use FCPX and Capture One)
Bought a base Studio Ultra (20c/48c/64gb/1TB) to replace two machines
- X299 Hackintosh (10980XE/64GB/1Tb/W5500)
- Unraid server (10400/64GB/1TB/GTX 1660) for Plex.
Last edited:
I have currently Asus Z490 hackintosh, Intel i9-10850, 32 GB RAM, RX 580, 1TB M2 drive, so I would like to know how your Studio fared in comparison with your Hackintosh and how u use it, what is your general impression. I use my Hack mainly for Logic Pro and FCPX projects.
Last edited:
A 12900k with 128gb of ram.
Sad, it's just too unstable as a workstation.
I blame windows, not the hardware. If only microsoft could get their act together - which will never happen.
If the studio ultra shows unstable behavior, I'm going to be slightly peeved.
My M1 macbook pro has been great though, even as a workhorse for a few months, so I'm not that worried.
Sad, it's just too unstable as a workstation.
I blame windows, not the hardware. If only microsoft could get their act together - which will never happen.
If the studio ultra shows unstable behavior, I'm going to be slightly peeved.
My M1 macbook pro has been great though, even as a workhorse for a few months, so I'm not that worried.
I'm working with graphic design, photography, coding (homepages and webshops) and the occasional event (video).
It's clear the single threaded performance just wasn't cutting it anymore with the M1 cores being so much more powerful. That can definitely be felt in my normal workflow. The power efficiency is also something else. The highest package power I've hit is around 65 Watt, using both tasks for the CPU, GPU and neural engine simultaneous. The VEGA FE alone would hit over 400 Watt on some tasks.
I guess the only reason I kept on to the old Mac Pro was the fact that I felt the 2019 Mac Pro just clearly wasn't for me and could never justify the entry price / performance ratio. I disregarded the iMac Pro and iMac as well, as I bought a Dell UP3218K (7680x4320 pixels) 8K monitor in 2018. Unfortunately it doesn't play nice with macOS and the M1 chips, so it will exhibit timing issues which can only be resolved by reconnecting it several times at every boot. It frankly sucks but I can't imagine myself downgrading to 5K or 6K.
I use Adobe CC, so only have experience with Adobe Camera RAW. The 32GB of RAM in the base model Mac Studio can be a limitation at times, especially when doing heavy focus stacking.
I haven't tried it out, but I'll give it a whirl. It looks like its very basic compared to the program I use--Helicon Focus. Helicon is AS native, but the problem is that its still using old OpenCL for graphics, so the boost using the GPU is pretty weak compared to what is *could* be. The Apple GPU doesn't work nearly as well as the AMD W6800X Duo in my Mac Pro, which is not surprising given that Apple deprecated OpenCL a number of years ago now.
It depends on the task. I do a lot of photo editing in Adobe Lightroom Classic. On the tasks I can benchmark, it's about 5-10% faster on most of them. Not a lot. A few tasks though it's much faster--50% or more. Overall though the user experience is just so much better. Everything is much more responsive and feels more fluid. I tend to be running half a dozen or more applications at the same time, and will have multiple browser tabs running. That all adds up to the pressure on the memory and CPU, and I drive two ProDisplay XDRs, so that taxes the GPU as well.
The Mac Pro will become the primary box for doing focus stacking for now as it can crunch through that really well, but I'm just amazed that a machine that cost 1/4 as much and generates practically no heat (vs. heating up my office) can be so incredibly fast.
2010 Mac Pro 5,1 3.33 GHz hex-core. The 5,1 was sluggish editing some old VHS home videos that I had just had digitized. Awaiting my Studio Display and finalizing the desktop setup before I resume editing, and hoping that the M1 Max with 32 GPU cores and 32GB of RAM is faster. And I need to figure out how to dispose of the Mac Pro...
Current: Mac Mini (2018) 6-core with 64GB RAM and Blackmagic eGPU Pro (Vega 56)
Ordered: Ultra 20/64/128/4TB due in early May
I do a lot of photography with a Nikon D850 but I have almost stopped using it as processing has been a pain for years. The new Mac Studio looks like it will be an improvement. Also I’m into astrophotography so PixInsight and Photoshop will hopefully run a bit faster and let me concentrate on taking images rather than hours on integrating and clean up tasks.
Ordered: Ultra 20/64/128/4TB due in early May
I do a lot of photography with a Nikon D850 but I have almost stopped using it as processing has been a pain for years. The new Mac Studio looks like it will be an improvement. Also I’m into astrophotography so PixInsight and Photoshop will hopefully run a bit faster and let me concentrate on taking images rather than hours on integrating and clean up tasks.
Mac mini 2018 and Windows PC...kind of.
My Mac mini 2018 died recently, so I was using a Windows PC (Core i7 10700F, RTX 3060 Ti) but it's so loud and hot it increasing room temperature by 2~3 degrees celsius even at idle.
I'm very happy with my Mac Studio, silent, faster than Core i7 10700F, and stays cool.
My Mac mini 2018 died recently, so I was using a Windows PC (Core i7 10700F, RTX 3060 Ti) but it's so loud and hot it increasing room temperature by 2~3 degrees celsius even at idle.
I'm very happy with my Mac Studio, silent, faster than Core i7 10700F, and stays cool.