Playing FFXIV with the wife, getting ready for my New Game+ in Sekiro.
on switch? is it awesome?
I will play it one day... but I have to set a lot of time aside for RPG's
Nah, it's the MMO on PC/PS4.
I have pondered getting FFXII for the Switch tho, it's one of my favorite mainline Final Fantasy games.
(Fun bit of trivia, Fran from Final Fantasy XII was one of my first ever cosplays as a kid)
I suck at parrying too, at least in Dark Souls, maybe a little better in Bloodborne.
In Sekiro, the parry window, called 'deflect', is pretty generous. You can even spam the deflect button with decent results.
I'm only through a few bosses, but I'm really enjoying this game so far. If you like Soulsbourne, you owe it to yourself to try Sekiro. There are enough similarities between franchises that you should feel right at home.
Picked it up on Friday/Installing.
Just a few things:
1.) Kind of surprised to see some of the critical reviews that are already released, mainly by the larger journalists, but I usually don’t flock to sites like IGN/GameSpot/Meta, ect, because they tend to over exaggerate and give away too many plot points about the game/storyline.
2.) The more ‘local user’ reviews actually have been very good, the only thing I’ve read so far was that there is some repetitious event/missions in the game, but I think that applies pretty much to any type of sandbox/RPG. Altogether, I will give my impressions later [Without spoilers], but I suspect this will be a fairly reputable game.
View attachment 834092
1.) Kind of surprised to see some of the critical reviews that are already released, mainly by the larger journalists, but I usually don’t flock to sites like IGN/GameSpot/Meta, ect, because they tend to over exaggerate and give away too many plot points about the game/storyline.
The reviews I've been reading have been pretty brutal ranging from "hated it" to "just average". The tech behind the game does look impressive.
The reviews I've been reading have been pretty brutal ranging from "hated it" to "just average". The tech behind the game does look impressive.
Which sounds quite a bit like the reviews for Anthem.
If you are referring to critic reviews, some of them of have been harsh, but the *user* reviews have generally been very good for the majority, which leads me to my next point.
The most impressive part, is ‘Bend studios’ already released a patch for the game within 48 hours of its release addressing some of the issues that were complained of (Lag, audio cues, glitches, frame-rate drops), which from current readings, have really improved the game immensely. And that says milestones about a developer that already made patches for reported problems within 48 hours of a release and there dedication to this new game. As an example, when Metro exodus still hasn’t patched audio/graphic problems that’s been a game released for over three months.
No, Not even close to being relevant in comparison based off your quote. Anthem was a completely broken game from day one with server problems, intrusively long load times, and not to mention it was crashing the PS4, None of which is mutually exclusive to ‘Days Gone.’ Anthem was a catastrophe with those three things alone, even though it has/had potential to be a good game.
And what is your idea? How many hours in the game? Is it getting boring fast like a lot of reviews say? Or is the game keeping you entertained?
I will update you tonight on my impressions of the overall experience later tonight, where I can be a bit more detailed.
Still waiting ;-)
I'm finishing Far Cry 5 tonight, about to kick Joseph Seeds ***.