@bkmoore773, thanks! I have a G-Tech 500 GB, but it is a Q-Drive (four different connection interfaces) vs. the two interfaces (I think) on the earlier drives. Either way, it is a great, solid and fast drive.
I don’t want to sound daft….but I never knew this was possible…. 😁I managed to create a network bootable disk image on my 17-inch iMac. I then used that image to simultaneously boot both my 2006 Intel iMacs as diskless network clients off of a PowerPC G5.
That's what this group is for. To show each other our cool Macintosh projects and give each other ideas. Steve Jobs demonstrated network booting in 1999. He was quite the showman, you can see it here: OS X Server Introduction.I don’t want to sound daft….but I never knew this was possible…. 😁
Very cool.
So glad that I'm not the only person to think this. Much as I love my B&W, heck I forked out and bought it a G3 1Ghz upgrade only a year or two back. I have to say that since owning a Quicksilver, I have quickly become aware of what a PITA it really is. I love how it looks, I love that it was my first ever G3 back in 2005. BUT it gives me more headaches than any other machine I own. It's the karen of my computer collection. I've not had it turned on since last year, I know for a fact if I were to drag it across the room and turn it on now. It wouldn't boot, until I've laid on the floor, removed each dimm stick, reinserted them, took them out again, placed them in different slots, flashed the pram, THEN placed them back in their original positions only to see it boot up. I'm amazed I actually have any hair left lolWorked fine on the B&W. For some reason, the utility spits out a memory error on my Graphite. Anyways, yet another reason to keep such a Tempermental PITA box as a B&W around. I also picked up another Orico SSD sled (2.5 to 3.5) and stuck that in my a1117 so the 2.5 drive isn’t flopping around in there anymore lol.
The B&W is sat beside the door to my office, I upgraded it last year from a G4 500mhz to a G3 1Ghz and honestly it wasn't wort the effort or the money. Sure it's a little faster, I can make it on here even. But overall it isn't mind blowing, gee wiz that's fast! In fact, since I fitted the darn G4, it has become super picky over ram and will NOT accept 1gb of max ram. I'm not sure if there's a hardware limitation I'm not aware off, but no matter what I do, it does not want to boot with a full bank of 256mb sticks.I hear ya man. Part of me loves this B&W but a big part of me just wants to kick it across the room when it gets pissy.
“ The Karen of my computer collection”
This made me LOL. Perfect description of this box![]()
I have to ask ... does this work in Sorbet?
I downloaded your R-gui port and I am rlly impressed because you managed to build it with Aqua interface. How did you do that? Could FileZilla be build using Aqua?I finally got the latest release of wxWidgets (branch 3.2) working on powerpc. Here is the latest FileZilla built against it.
View attachment 2493106
I downloaded your R-gui port and I am rlly impressed because you managed to build it with Aqua interface. How did you do that? Could FileZilla be build using Aqua?
but I see three mons
That was a TV. I was watching March Madnessbut I see three mons![]()
I finally got the latest release of wxWidgets (branch 3.2) working on powerpc. Here is the latest FileZilla built against it.
View attachment 2493106
Today, I upgraded my Power Mac G5 DP 2.3 GHz from 4.5 GB of RAM to 8.5 GB of RAM, running before and after benchmarks using GeekBench 2.2.7.
Here is the memory configuration before the update:
View attachment 2493781
and here is the memory configuration AFTER the update:
View attachment 2493782
You will note that the new RAM, although sold as, and labeled as, PC2-4200U, is recognized by the Mac as PC2-3200U, and hence is presumably accessed at a slower speed than the PC2-4200U RAM.
Happily, this was not the case, or if it was, it did not impact system performance.
Prior to the upgrade, the GeekBench 2.2.7 RAM score was 1693. After the upgrade, the same score was 1730, actually FASTER despite the slower RAM. I am a bit perplexed, but happy nonetheless. It annoys me that the new RAM was recognized at a lower speed than what it was sold as, but it has clearly not impacted system performance.
One other "side effect" of the upgrade. This machine used to idle at about 38 C. Now it idles at about 47 C. That new RAM must throw more than a little heat! The CPU fans actually seem to be running at a slower speed than before, which is also perplexing, but may in some measure account for the higher idle temperature. At any rate 47 C is well within the "safe zone" for the PowerPC 970MP. If I *ever* succeed in getting my G5 Quad to idle at 47 C I will declare victory and be done with my seemingly endless work on the Quad's Liquid Cooling System (LCS).