Sadly, my 2006 MBP2,1's backlight has died (not GPU, external monitor works fine) so now I'm looking into a new display assembly as the backlight seems like a tough job to do while re-using the old screen.
Adding a BassJump2 might cause cracks in the wall ... ?did i post on this before?
I must've posted on this before
but if i haven't - this, this is what I've done with an early Intel Mac lately. I'd be using my 2007 17-incher but THAT ONE has its sound set to "Wake up the whole entire neighbourhood" mode. I will be getting its PRAM fixed so it doesn't reset every time but... for now it'll only be turned on during appropriate hours. Ah to live in an apartment with walls thinner than wet toilet paper - 0/10, would not recommend.
No BASS, no fun!Adding a BassJump2 might cause cracks in the wall ... ?
did i post on this before?
I must've posted on this before
but if i haven't - this, this is what I've done with an early Intel Mac lately. I'd be using my 2007 17-incher but THAT ONE has its sound set to "Wake up the whole entire neighbourhood" mode. I will be getting its PRAM fixed so it doesn't reset every time but... for now it'll only be turned on during appropriate hours. Ah to live in an apartment with walls thinner than wet toilet paper - 0/10, would not recommend.
Behold theI have four displays attached to my Mac Mini!
The DisplayLink drivers for macOS should™ work with any USB DisplayLink adapter.The critical piece here is a SIIG DisplayLink USB adapter that I saw on eBay several months back. It's for Mac.
You're lucky that you don't need High Sierra because IIRC DisplayLink devices don't work properly on it.First off - the DisplayLink app didn't work. So, I tried the USB driver, which also didn't work initially. Due to some issues with Catalina, I decided just to wipe the SSD and reinstall patched Mojave.
I will have to get back to you. Right now it's a stock/virgin install, except for the DisplayLink driver. Other than a delay when switching resolutions and a tendency to forget some display settings after waking the displays there seems to be no lag. I don't currently have iStat installed and did not think to open Activity Monitor.Behold thehorrorglory of DisplayLink! What's the lag like via USB 2.0 when e.g. moving windows or playing video on the USB displays? And what's the CPU usage like? These are the main reasons I'm staying away from DisplayLink... it's laggy, creates CPU load and the drivers have a history of quirks.
Yes, those are the ones I used. It just took some trial and error to realize there were two different types (an app and a driver). It was the app that was not working and I had to trial and error the driver.The DisplayLink drivers for macOS should™ work with any USB DisplayLink adapter.
Well, I would not be using this on my work MBP and I'd try rolling back to 10.3.3 if I needed HS on my own systems. It's 10.13.4 to 10.13.6 where it becomes an issue.You're lucky that you don't need High Sierra because IIRC DisplayLink devices don't work properly on it.![]()
Would trying it on fully supported El Capitan be worth it?Oh well, it's a patched OS and shouldn't really be running Mojave anyway.
No, not really. High Sierra is as far as I'd step down and I really do not want to. I've got a dark mode script that works for HS which I got when my MP was on High Sierra and that still makes things bearable on my work MBP. But I want to run Adobe CC21 (at least ID CC21) and I don't believe El Cap will support that.Would trying it on fully supported El Capitan be worth it?
So, now I recall. Apparently on the Mini(s) I am stuck on this version. The MP has 5.x, so I stupidly copied it and prefs over to the L2009 Mini and not from the E2009 Mini.Surprisingly, it's Vivaldi that is being my main problem now. It does not want to work above version 3+. SMH.
It features the wrong font - Fixedsys rather than IBM 9×16, which curiously is what your menus and title bars use rather than the more faithful MS Sans Serif - thoughMy favorite part is the BSOD wallpaper.![]()
Seen this gorgeous icon macOS uses for PCs on a network?My favorite part is the BSOD wallpaper.![]()
With a 2.93GHz C2D PPCMC7 literally can stream a 720p YouTube video in ~5 seconds. The speed hack I found for rpi's and implemented in PPCMC7 does wonders.Got out my late 2009 Mini that was gathering dust and decided to open it up and put in 4 GB of RAM and an SSD I had laying around. I initially put Snow Leopard on it and everything was great until my airport card started refusing to connect to my home Wi-Fi after installing the last round of updates via Software Update. I restarted the Mac, disabled IPv6, zapped the PRAM, but none of that helped. I decided to try a different OS X version and decided to put Leopard on here, inspired by a recent thread about Leopard. I achieved this by putting the Mini into TDM and using my 2006 MBP to do the installation and updating to 10.5.8. Despite not being officially supported, the Mini did successfully boot into 10.5.8. There was some graphical glitching upon first boot, but that went away in subsequent boots. The name of the Mac still has macbookpro in the name instead of macmini, but System Profiler provides the correct info. The built-in Wi-Fi is working just fine even after applying all the updates. Leopard and Universal apps really do run better on here than on the Sawtooth. The Intel build of PPCMC runs really nice on here too. Both QuickTime and PPCMC start up faster than they do on the Sawtooth. The big downside with Intel Leopard is that not all PPC native software runs as intended or in some cases not at all. This is part of why I keep going back to the Sawtooth for my Leopard needs (the other part being that I am just really attached to the Sawtooth, even though I have "better" Mac hardware now), even though web browsing and video playback is significantly better on a Core2Duo. Speaking of web browsing, I wonder what the future of web browsing will be for Intel Leopard since TFF went into hobby mode? Maybe I'll have to finally learn how to build TFF and make my own builds. I did install Xcode on here in case I decided to get into programming stuff for Leopard.
The same can be said about Snow Leopard, which almost any Intel Mac released in 2011 or earlier can run. If I had to decide between Leopard and Snow Leopard, I'd always go for the latter. Tiger (more precisely, its UI), however, will always hold a special space in my heart.Intel Tiger and Leopard are insanely overlooked by most people. They are so optimized and fast compared to most newer Mac OS versions. They also allow you to install any software without having to go through system preferences settings like modern Mac OS.