I always argue with my brother about the colour of things. The funny thing is, he's colour blind so his arguments never seem to hold up.
Even though I know I'm colour-blind, I had a look at this test because I'm always looking for a fiddle-factor to try and convince myself that I'm better at seeing colour than I know I am. I scored a miserable 1/10 and suspect that I was just guessing on that single correct answer. Purple Haze (whatever that is).Doctor Q said:Here is another type of color blindness test: 10 slides where you identify which colored dot looks most like the one in the center. It points out each mistake as you go, so for me it says "You have just made a Protanomalous type of matching error" after most of them, confirming what I already know.
devilot said:I think it just means that people aren't as used to more 'antiquated'-type fonts for numbers? I dunno... I saw it w/ no problems.
Doctor Q said:Here is another type of color blindness test: 10 slides where you identify which colored dot looks most like the one in the center. It points out each mistake as you go, so for me it says "You have just made a Protanomalous type of matching error" after most of them, confirming what I already know.
Chundles said:Um, I'm not colour blind but I don't see a "3" in your first image Q. I see a very clear "8".
whooleytoo said:Ok, now I'm blind as well as colour blind! - I did the test but didn't see any score, where does it appear?!?
dubbz said:It won't display a score. It will just notify you right after one of the tests if you got it wrong. Just add it together yourself If you only got the last, final, screen then congrats! Your colour vision is perfect.
That T-shirt is very clever and hilarious.dotdotdot said:By the way, totally irrelevant to this post, but on tshirthell.com, theres a shirt that says "F*** The Colorblind" in the circle thing above, and my friend sent it to me (of course, not knowing I [kind of] am) and I couldn't see it, so I didn't get it. Thats the only time it has negatively affected me.
Doctor Q said:That T-shirt is very clever and hilarious.
Since I don't favor shirts with foul language in large letters (it's bad enough that I wear mismatched clothes, a pocket protector, and a propellor cap), I have an idea for a variation on the theme. Have it sayDon't tell my color blind husband that I'm seeing somebody else!Then wives could wear it while walking around with their color blind husbands. Or wives can pretend their husbands are color blind and get the same reaction from other people!
And at the same time, many people who deal with color on Macs prefer the all-gray Graphite theme! Those corner gumdrops might be more helpful if the X/, - and + symbols were shown all the time instead of only when the mouse is there, but maybe their color doesn't matter so much?dotdotdot said:Thats also why I've heard Windows is better for colorblind or disabled - though many people on here hate it, everything is so presented to you without having to look for it. On a Mac, its colored, so everything looks great for most people but those with colorblindness have a tough time seeing everything.
iBlue said:hehehe how evil! there could be a nicer way to get the same effect out of that shirt... like "colorblind people are really weird." or something on the lines of "hahaha colorblind people can't read this" and put a face on it in the fashion of those dots with numbers. that other saying is a bit hostile.
It also makes two points I didn't mention earlier about the red-green color blind:Colourblind kids are like kids with dyslexia or learning disabilities: They often learn ways to adapt and function in a way essentially equivalent to nondisabled people. Over a lifetime, a great many kludges, rules of thumb, and forms of guesswork develop to make sense of a world whose colours they see differently. Since nearly all colourblind people can distinguish brightness and contrast, that's one way they identify that two colours are different. They may not know from direct experience what the colours look like to someone with "colour-normal" vision, but they know the hues are not the same. Colourblind people learn that certain objects are certain colours. If an unknown object comes along with an unknown true colour, they can make an educated guess based on the colour used to describe other objects with that same apparent colour and brightness. ("People tell me things that look this colour are dark red, so I'll hazard a guess that this thing is dark red, too.")
Doctor Q said:Colourblind kids are like kids with dyslexia or learning disabilities: They often learn ways to adapt and function in a way essentially equivalent to nondisabled people. Over a lifetime, a great many kludges, rules of thumb, and forms of guesswork develop to make sense of a world whose colours they see differently. Since nearly all colourblind people can distinguish brightness and contrast, that's one way they identify that two colours are different. They may not know from direct experience what the colours look like to someone with "colour-normal" vision, but they know the hues are not the same. Colourblind people learn that certain objects are certain colours. If an unknown object comes along with an unknown true colour, they can make an educated guess based on the colour used to describe other objects with that same apparent colour and brightness. ("People tell me things that look this colour are dark red, so I'll hazard a guess that this thing is dark red, too.")
I think gardens with light colors (light green, white, yellow) and blue are nice looking. When the colors are brown, dark green, and red, I find it less attractive, because it all looks the same.UKnjb said:As in, the garden here has a load of green stuff in it (I know, because I have been told! Grass, leafy shrubs etc.). Any flowers, red, yellow, whatever, take on aspects of the overrall 'garden' colour; they don't stand out as being different from the grass of green shrubs or anything, just a different shade of a sludgy 'brown'. Probably not explaining this at all well, but you should well understand the problems of describing these things adequately.
"Grape soda is purple." "Jeans are blue." If I run into blue grape soda or purple jeans, I wouldn't know the difference, but I call them the colors I've learned are correct without thinking. I assume that cake frosting is pink and not gray because I've never heard of gray frosting. I'm so used to octagonal stop signs being red that I'd assume anything dark that said "STOP" was red and probably that any dark octagonal sign was red.What sort of objects do we learn as having particular colours associated with them? I am not familiar with them - but then the above garden analogy might explain it. Some examples might help to see if I do 'learn' these things unknowingly.
Doctor Q said:It just occurred to me, from thinking about this, that I've always assumed that fire alarm switches (the ones kids pull in school as pranks) are red, because I know fire engines are red, but I've never thought to ask about it.
Doctor Q said:Happy faces are yellow too, right? I assume that this --> <-- is yellow, but I've never asked, because it's so unlikely to be the shade of green I confuse with yellow. This --> <--- could be red or brown but I "know" (in quotes) that it is red because it means "mad". This --> <-- looks blue (right?) and I can tell that this --> <--- is a different shade, but not what color it is. Blue? Purple? Gray?