Ooh I like that.
Looking at the milanese loop, I wonder if there will be problems with magnet sticking to some metal object and undoing the loop? E.g. in public transportation, your wrist touches a steel bar as you're exiting, the yawnWatch falls off, the doors close, and you see the departing train with someone picking your mehWatch and smiling.
Also, probably won't take much force for a thief to yank it from your wrist...
Uh yeah that 'concern' makes no sense though. If it were linked to the middle of the side of the watch, the band would be hovering, not making contact with the skin, for the first few centimeters. Just how is that a better design?My biggest issue with the Almost 360 (besides the flat tire display) is the band connects at the bottom of the watch rather than the middle which makes it looks like a big aluminum tire is sitting on top of a cheap leather strap. It doesn't look like it was designed as one product whereas with Watch you can clearly see it was designed as one holistic product.
Image
Btw, for those who think the Watch is too big and bulky, this is the LG G Watch R (who comes up with these names?). Gotta love how the text is slightly cut off in the first photo yet the Watch is supposedly ugly and a bad design because it's watch face isn't round. And the LG watch uses a fake tachymeter to hide the bezel (and give the illusion of a completely round display). But it seems completely out of place when not viewing an analog watch face.
Image
Image
Uh yeah that 'concern' makes no sense though. If it were linked to the middle of the side of the watch, the band would be hovering, not making contact with the skin, for the first few centimeters. Just how is that a better design?
Uh yeah that 'concern' makes no sense though. If it were linked to the middle of the side of the watch, the band would be hovering, not making contact with the skin, for the first few centimeters. Just how is that a better design?
I'm just not a fan of the way the band connects to the watch.
Compare this:
To:
The Almost 360 bands don't feel like an integral part of the watch, they feel like something that was just tacked on at the end. Like a fat aluminum tire was just laid on top of a leather band. I don't get that feeling with Watch. The Watch feels like it was designed as one harmonious product not the watch and then the bands as an afterthought.
Image
IF I decide to buy an Watch I think this will be my choice (I don't care if it's more masculine; rose gold will probably be out of my price range):
Image
I'm worried that the rose gold with rose gray leather will be too feminine for me. How about I buy the rose gold, and you buy that one, and we swap bands?
Hopefully Apple also sells bands separately. I might pair the Rose Gold with the blue stainless steel modern buckle. I'd hate to have to buy two watches to get the combination I like.
I would assume you'll pick a watch and then the band you want to go with it. Though I'm sure some combinations won't be available like the colored rubber bands with a gold watch. The only question I have is will they sell watch bands on their own (in case people want more than one) or can you only get a band with a watch. I have to believe they will as some people will want more than one band depending on the occasion.
If you ignore the bezel, the 360 really does have the ability to potentially look a really nice thing on your wrist. Just give it some time.
http://phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Gold-Moto-360-1-640x820.jpg
http://img.talkandroid.com/uploads/2014/11/Moto_360_Champagne_Gold_01.jpg
http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/Moto_360_18_mm_vs_23_mm_Different_Views_2_Wide.png
These renderings make it look way better than it actually would, especially with the screen. It looks like it has a Retina display in the rendering, but in real life, the density is mediocre.
Apple Watch has a Retina display, and the bezel is usually invisible. Text and icons look like they're coming from the surface of the watch face, like it's all one object.
I have never understood the fascination with the bezel thickness.
This is a watch not a TV not a tablet not a phone
In the world of watches prominent bezels are often desirable and are featured intentionally.
Only an idiotic designer would accept that flat tire look in order to achieve thin basil on a watch
I hope the text on the watch isn't really that small. The text should be glanceable at a foot or more away.People complain that Apple is form over function but that's exactly what the Almost 360 is. Moto didn't ask what the job to be done was and then design the best shape/form around that. From the outset they said it has to be round and everything was designed around that constraint.
Seems to me Apple started with functionality and determined the rounded rec was the best shape to display information (there is a reason PCs, phones and tablets aren't round). Sure round is great for an analog watch face. But is it great for much else? Below are a couple Watch apps shown off at the event. I suppose they could be re-worked to fit within a round display but the display would have to be quite large to fit any usable information.
I hope the text on the watch isn't really that small. The text should be glanceable at a foot or more away.
You like to read your watch from a foot away?
Why?
You like to read your watch from a foot away?
Why?
I'm just not a fan of the way the band connects to the watch.
Compare this:
To:
The Almost 360 bands don't feel like an integral part of the watch, they feel like something that was just tacked on at the end. Like a fat aluminum tire was just laid on top of a leather band. I don't get that feeling with Watch. The Watch feels like it was designed as one harmonious product not the watch and then the bands as an afterthought.
Image