… only that the actual Macbook will be cheaper than this iPad/Keyboard/Pencil combo.
Good point and one that really highlights the iPad’s weakness. It should be a lot more capable for the price.
… only that the actual Macbook will be cheaper than this iPad/Keyboard/Pencil combo.
I also use it for Photo Editing and DJing. Other people on here use it for music creation.
I also use it for Photo Editing and DJing. Other people on here use it for music creation.
I also use mine to record voiceovers for work videos.I’m always genuinely surprised to hear from people who can use it as a primary work device, but keep the examples coming. Happy to be proven wrong.
For some people it is, others it isn’t.Well kind of. I still don’t like that it’s a more locked down platform. I still don’t personally consider it to be a full general purpose computer.
agreed; and a legit esc key!The keyboard would be great if it just had a row of function keys. Leave the material alone.
That's right. On the other hand, maybe the keyboard isn't as sturdy 😂I would argue that the iPad is far less likely to flex and touch the keyboard under the same pressure as a MacBook display is.
Not sure. My backpack has a specific compartment for laptops, and yet the aforementioned issue happened. With my new MBP I just put a fiber cloth - the one I use to clean my glasses - on the keyboard before I close the lid.I only travel with my M2 Pro 16 incher rarely (retired) but have a special backpack to protect it and keep other stuff from pushing against directly (has a nice padded sleeve) wonder if that will protect it from this issue?
I doubt it as this would cannibalize Macbook sales, especially because iPads have become quite capable in more recent years.This is why I still hope for macOS on iPad.
LOL good point 🤣That's right. On the other hand, maybe the keyboard isn't as sturdy 😂
How about not being able to choose a default app for each file type? How about the impossibility to have cloud services like dropbox to sync in the background with the file app? (even the pro version of Dropbox, which can sync folders inside the app, does not sync with the file app, and can't even sync inside the drobox app itself in the background since true background activity is not an option on the iPad....)I don’t understand this argument. iPad has a file management system called Files app. I use it frequently, what does it not do for you?
Power users don't necessarily need CPU intensive apps (only some do). But they do need the full version of some apps and apps that are simply not avaiable at all on iPadOS. They also need true backgroud tasks, but this would probably reduce iPad battery life too much... (iPads have smaller batteries than Macs).Yeah, there are fundamental differences between how files are handled between a touch OS and mouse OS. Even simple base functionality like single-tap vs double-click changes how you interact. The two OSes just work differently and frustration caused by these differences are the core of the "I need better file management" want.
Of course the power users who want to do all their Mac heavy lifting on the iPad are going to quickly encounter the thermal throttling joys of a thin, sealed device with no vents (even the MacBook Air has vents in the hinge) and a heat generating screen on one surface. #ipadthrottlegate #whycanti3drenderonanipadmini
Totally agree on this, even opening the file system fully wouldn't move the needle much if at all, if people cannot run desktop apps on iPadOSSure, but you said that better file management is the thing which will stop people from also buying a Mac, which is simply not true. Even if the iPad had the MacOS Finder, people who need a Mac would still need a Mac to run their Mac apps. However, running all your Mac apps even with the existing Files app would reduce Mac sales. Of course you cant run Mac apps without a menubar which is something iPadOS doesn't have.
Power users don't necessarily need CPU intensive apps (only some do). But they do need the full version of some apps and apps that are simply not avaiable at all on iPadOS. They also need true backgroud tasks, but this would probably reduce iPad battery life too much... (iPads have smaller batteries than Macs).
Totally agree on this, even opening the file system fully wouldn't move the needle much if at all, if people cannot run desktop apps on iPadOS
Correct. The price is already way past patently absurd.Making the Magic Keyboard even more expensive is about where I stopped reading.
You're not folding it right.Curious how they’ll prevent the iPad screen from scratching on the aluminum
Since July. No problems with it and as I felt so pleasantly surprised I felt safe to suggest it. But if the reviews are all over the place maybe we're just lucky with our unit.I had not seen this one but the Amazon reviews are all over the place.. how long have you had it?
I doubt it as this would cannibalize Macbook sales, especially because iPads have become quite capable in more recent years.
I really don't think it would tbh.
We have seen recently the iPad embrace the pointer, and if rumours are to be believe soon will see the Mac embrace touch. Of course this doesn't change the fact that the iPad is and always will be a touch first device, while the Mac is a pointer first device.
I do think when the touch Macs are introduced this will be when we see a convergence of software between the iPad and Mac. They will run the same interface which fattens up for touch or slims down for a pointer.
That doesn't mean the iPad would cannibalise the MacBook however. You want to draw, or read a magazine on a couch, then sure the iPad is the best choice for flexibility. But do more typing, working on a desk and want longer battery life, then you go with a MacBook for a more traditional laptop experience. They're all sales to Apple anyway.