And give the iPhone 5 only 4 versions of iOS or 5c just 3 when the 4S has 5? I don't think so.100% Agree. 64 bit only.
No reason for that new apps should already be 64 bit ready since a some monthsI hope they drop 32 bit support. The faster Apple leaves that behind, the faster developers will update their apps for 64-bit.
It's longe than others support there devices. At the end of the day iOS 9 could continue to be revised and tweaked long after iOS 10 is mainstream.And give the iPhone 5 only 4 versions of iOS or 5c just 3 when the 4S has 5? I don't think so.
Eventually Apple is going to start pulling the plug early because everyone complains that new iOS versions don't run well on older devices. The iPhone 5c, is the same thing as the iPhone 5. Look how the iPhone 4s runs with iOS 9, putting iOS 10 on an iPhone 5/5c will be the same, if not worse.And give the iPhone 5 only 4 versions of iOS or 5c just 3 when the 4S has 5? I don't think so.
You must not realize how much more capable the A6 chip is over the A5, if that's the way Apple were working they would have dropped the A5 already. It seems more time based to me, rather than power or architecture.Eventually Apple is going to start pulling the plug early because everyone complains that new iOS versions don't run well on older devices. The iPhone 5c, is the same thing as the iPhone 5. Look how the iPhone 4s runs with iOS 9, putting iOS 10 on an iPhone 5/5c will be the same, if not worse.
So they shouldn't support 32-bit devices because you don't like complaining, really? The oldest devices are always "obsolete" so that's not going to stop. Next it'll be 64-bit, then it'll be devices that don't have 3D Touch.Apple has already begun the slow dropping of 32bit. More and more new features that get added are 64bit only. I believe some of the Slide Over/Split Screen and PiP are 64bit only. Safari Content Blockers are 64bit only. And the most current addition to iOS 9, Night Shift is 64bit only. So the process is already started and moving to a 64bit only OS is happening soon. Maybe this year (iOS 10) but for sure by next year (iOS 11)
I personally can't wait for that day to come of when iOS drops all the baggage of supporting 32bit. It has to be done sooner than later in order to move iOS forward.
People will complain no matter what Apple does. ("They made my device sloooow with the newest iOS forcing me to buy a new device!!!!" or "They didn't release the new iOS on my device, forcing me to buy a new device so I can get the new iOS!!!!")
I would rather the dropped support complaints, because they will tire out after a month or so. The slow on my old device complaints would last the entire life cycle of that iOS.
So they shouldn't support 32-bit devices because you don't like complaining, really? The oldest devices are always "obsolete" so that's not going to stop. Next it'll be 64-bit, then it'll be devices that don't have 3D Touch.
We'll see if that results in any benefit. I'm not sure app developers really want to drop those portions of their user base at this time anyway.No, not because of complaining. That's not what I said.
They should drop 32bit so that they can dump all the baggage that comes along with having to keep supporting older hardware and 32bit. That's so much extra code to have to include. If they drop 32bit then everything can be rewritten to be leaner and more efficient 64bit.
My comment about the complaining is about Apple can't win with whatever decision they decide to make but just ripping the bandaid off and getting it over with and dropping 32bit all together is the better choice rather than dragging it along longer than it needs to.
Strange but sort of true I've had less issues with the 4 on iOS 9 than others users on the Air seem to be having.I prefer to have an Ipad 4 rather to have an original Ipad Air
[doublepost=1452285763][/doublepost]The 4 is less buggy compared to the original air
Why? It has the highest number of installed units out of every iPad. Take out the iPad 2 and Mini 1 ( the same device) and thats nearly 40 percent of iPads in use that can't upgrade.
They run well enough for plenty of people including myself. iOS 9 is slower but still perfectly usable.Let's be real, they won't run it well. It's 2016 and the iPad 2 is from 2011. It's better that they cut it... but we know if they keep it people will complain about performance, and if they cut it people will complain about lack of support. I hope they cut it, those users shouldn't upgrade their iPad beyond iOS 7 if they care about performance.
They run well enough for plenty of people including myself. iOS 9 is slower but still perfectly usable.
Apple could essentially deliver iOS 10 for A5 devices as an extremely basic version, next to no new features, just the changes to allow continued app compatibility and iCloud syncing plus any new security fixes.
If people complaining is your biggest reason for not wanting the majority of iPad users to be supported, then maybe ignore the complaining? Apple could easily fix it by allowing downgrading anyway.
That way the usable life of devices is extended, which is especially good for the environment and those who bought iPad mini 1s 6 months ago. If Apple thought it was good enough to take he fat margins from selling old technology in 2015 (The mini 1 outsold the mini 2 and 3 for a portion of 2015), then apple can extend support for as long as they can.
A5 chip devices already got a "bonus" year when Apple decided to not drop a single device with iOS 9, when they normally have dropped some devices in previous years.
I'm fairly confident A5 will for sure be gone in iOS 10 (especially since they are getting sued by some people in the US that iOS 9 destroyed their A5 4s iPhone and made it "unusable".) That's what Apple gets when they actually do people a favour by extending support instead of dropping it like it was expected to be (it shocked nearly everyone that iOS 9 dropped no devices.)
The iPad 3 is basically an (iPad 2 with Retina display), iPad 4 is 5 times faster than an iPad 3 with it A6x, if u compare iPad 2 to iPad 3, they both have a5, iPad 3 has a5x to handle the Retina display and graphic stuff. iPad 3 was released as a mistake as people demanded a new iPad in the time apple was just trying to shift the time it releases an iPad from March to October, there was nothing Apple could do to stop people from complaining unless they release an IPad 3 with less features than they planned, so basically the iPad 3 was the iPad meant to be released with an A6x chip and a new lightning connector, Apple didn't have much time for completing the whole project, they released iPad 3 which is an incomplete project with A5x chip then released iPad 4 which was supposed to be in the place of the iPad 3rd gen.
A5 chip devices already got a "bonus" year when Apple decided to not drop a single device with iOS 9, when they normally have dropped some devices in previous years.
I'm fairly confident A5 will for sure be gone in iOS 10 (especially since they are getting sued by some people in the US that iOS 9 destroyed their A5 4s iPhone and made it "unusable".) That's what Apple gets when they actually do people a favour by extending support instead of dropping it like it was expected to be (it shocked nearly everyone that iOS 9 dropped no devices.)
It's note really exactly like this, I've read an article about the iPad 3 & iPad 4 and it actually said that apple meant to shift the iPad release cycle from March to September & release a new iPad with a Retina display, lightning connector and A6x chip. People kept requesting Apple to upgrade the iPad line & for some other reasons apple had to release an in completed project. The A6x chip & lightning connector were meant to come with the iPad 3.Is that a very rambling stream of consciousness way of saying, iPad 4 was the iPad 3 that they hadn't finished in time and iPad 3 was the stopgap to market something new?
Those devices won't disappear with a 64 bit only iOS 10. Some people will upgrade, most of them probably won't until these iPads falls apart. If Apple drops them, developers will face smaller installation base and more hassle to keep their apps compatible. In an already shrinking iPad market, probably not a good outlook. As much as i appreciate a move to only 64 bit, there is no easy way out the current situation. I don't know, maybe Apple could release a barebone iOS 10 for those devices. Or some kind of last iOS 9.4 update with the possibility of minor future enhancements and security patches (similar to outdated Mac OS X versions).
I think either they should release iOS 10 for these devices (stripped right down) or continue with 9.X updates which would security and minor other updates to ensure compatiblity. Wouldn't it suck to have bought an iPad mini mid last year only to find that when you update pages on your Mac, you can't update on your iPad and because the new version of pages predictably uses a new file format, your iPad can open your documents.