iPhone or not, there's no way I'd pay that much for a phone. No way, Jose. It's good, but it's not Macbook Pro good.Wow...that's insane, nearly $1,100 USD
The iPhone 6S is nothing more than a flawed product, designed to yet again maximise Apple's bottom line first and foremost.
The fact they still only offer 16GB as the base model and 4K video recording shows this. I would much rather import a Note 5 into the UK.
And this thread is in the wrong forum on this website.
...Any one else thinking of switching over?
Apple keeps the 16gb around because it is an easy up-sell to the 64gb model. $100 for 4x the storage. Not too hard to convince your average soccer mom to upgrade.I don't see the phone as flawed but will agree that Apple is taking advantage of customers with the 16GB storage entry point. They get to enjoy higher margins than if they used 32GB AND potentially gain additional revenue from the iCloud storage upgrade that customer invariably need to get to accommodate those photos/video.
As far as it being in the wrong forum, the OP presented it as an inquiry to current Android users who might switch back, so I think it's in the right place.
Right....but if Samsung did it they would get blasted.Apple keeps the 16gb around because it is an easy up-sell to the 64gb model. $100 for 4x the storage. Not too hard to convince your average soccer mom to upgrade.
Wasn't some of these same people blasting Samsung for their pricing?Right....but if Samsung did it they would get blasted.
It's purley profit driven, and Apple knows they can get away with it becasue they are Apple
.
Wasn't some of these same people blasting Samsung for their pricing?
That wasn't even the point of my post. The same people are ok with apple over charging but dinged Samsung for the same thing. But I agree both companies have overpriced phones.Not when you consider what is available on the android side for the dollars spent. How isn't Samsung then not overpriced? They need to consider whom they are competing against as their market share is rapidly dwindling.
how on earth is it a flawed product? it is a great product just like alot of android phones are great products.The iPhone 6S is nothing more than a flawed product, designed to yet again maximise Apple's bottom line first and foremost.
The fact they still only offer 16GB as the base model and 4K video recording shows this. I would much rather import a Note 5 into the UK.
And this thread is in the wrong forum on this website.
how on earth is it a flawed product? it is a great product just like alot of android phones are great products.
yes they still offer 16GB which is dumb but the choice is there. All flagships are overpriced lets face it but people will still buy them
note 5 was said to have a smaller battery than note 4...that hasn't mattered for battery life.It's overpriced, the non Plus model has no OIS despite a brand new camera module, and the biggest reason it is flawed is the 16gb with 4K video recording, do they expect you to record 5 mins of video then upload to the cloud and then repeat it? All for in the UK £539 and it has a smaller battery.
I'll be ordering 6s plus to replace my 6 I'll keep my G4 and Moto X.We don't have apple stores here to camp out on - so I'll be ordering mine from Apple store online
It's a stunning device.
All flagships are overpriced sadly
16GB is pointless but as mentioned least there will likely be no storage of 64GB and 128GB models...there is choice. having a 16GB option doesn't mean the product is flawed. sadly
That comes across as making an excuse, it is flawed, you have a feature you cannot use due to the very limited non expandable storage on a very expensive device. It makes no difference if you can spend £80 more for the next storage size because the 16gb model still exists.
You assume everyone who buys an iphone uses it to it full potential.
The iphone to many has become more than just a phone. My 65 yr old mum has asked me to buy her a new 6S and to give away her 6. She has a PAYG sim which I topped up with £10 last year and today still has £7 worth of credit. She turns data off and doesn't even know how to use most apps.
Also you talk about 4k video. I wont even be using 4k video and I will buy a 128gb device. 99% of owners will probably not use 4k video.
In short 16gb is fine to some people. However I do agree that the 16gb offering is greed but at the same time a 32gb option would be as useless as the 16 gb version for nearly everyone on here.
Android fools people with their SD card option but the SD card is almost as useless as no memory (at least until Marshmallow arrives).
Apple can get away with the 16g because of history. Samsungs history is full of junk products especially their tablets.
That wasn't even the point of my post. The same people are ok with apple over charging but dinged Samsung for the same thing. But I agree both companies have overpriced phones.
It still doesn't mean the product is flawed. 16GB is bad of course but that has nothing to do with the actual product.That comes across as making an excuse, it is flawed, you have a feature you cannot use due to the very limited non expandable storage on a very expensive device. It makes no difference if you can spend £80 more for the next storage size because the 16gb model still exists.