I prefer to hear the sound of a motor than a battery whipper snipper lol
I prefer the much quieter EV sound thanks. You feel less drained after a long journey. Can talk on the phone (hands free of course!) and listen to music without the drone of a combustion engine.I prefer to hear the sound of a motor than a battery whipper snipper lol
I prefer the much quieter EV sound thanks. You feel less drained after a long journey. Can talk on the phone (hands free of course!) and listen to music without the drone of a combustion engine.
Plus of course you aren’t pumping out obnoxious gases as you drive.
No, that's already taken into account. If you compare total numbers, then ICE vehicles catch on fire thousands of times more often.Perhaps you are correct, but you have to consider the total number of ICE automobiles versus the total number of EV's.
EVs catch on fire much less often and are inherently safer. Very weird attempt to "both sides" something that's objectively true.But putting aside the notion of both an anti-EV or a pro-EV brigade, the most important to all life and the environment is to continue our efforts to improve or make all products that we make, safer. Blaming one side or another does not make any "brigade" right.
The facts say what's better, that's who. Sorry you find reality inconvenient. Insurance companies require verifiable facts in order to make money and not go out of business.It is a smoke and mirrors show; we are the spectators. Regardless of which human-made item is, a vehicle, house, and so on, it affects all life and the environment. Who is to say that one is better or worse than the rest?
The point I am trying to make has nothing to do with which automobile ignites more often than the other and the pollution each creates. Regardless, the construction and use of both types of automobiles leaves a trail of pollution, environmental damage and so on for the life of the vehicle. The main difference is that the ICE automobile emits harmful gasses, plus hydrocarbons whenever the engine idles, and this continues through the life of the vehicle, while the EV does not. Any harmful fumes emitted from the EV can only happen if there is a battery electrical malfunction, which is rare. I completely understand your points; as such I cannot argue with anybody about the pros and cons of either vehicle.The reality is my Audi A4 burns fuel and exhaust gases come out of the back, it’s visible and you can smell it. My wife’s Q4 doesn’t exhaust any fumes, therefore is not contributing to pollution, especially in built up areas on her commute. A few hundred like my car on the road is more of an environmental risk than a few hundred EV’s producing no pollution on their commute. You mentioned the environment and you don’t need an article or a report to point out the obvious.
c. No, that's already taken into account. If you compare total numbers, then ICE vehicles catch on fire thousands of times more often.
b. EVs catch on fire much less often and are inherently safer. Very weird attempt to "both sides" something that's objectively true.
a. The facts say what's better, that's who. Sorry you find reality inconvenient. Insurance companies require verifiable facts in order to make money and not go out of business.
The truth is as follows: the only way for humankind to not harm the environment and our own health is by not existing. But there are people in isolated places, villages, and so on, who subsist from the sea and land, people who aren't industrialized, don't have automobiles, nor electrical power.
Your daily commute really sucks….You guys wouldn't know what a long drive is. Do 1000km, 10.5 hours straight in a day and come back to me lol.
The point I am trying to make has nothing to do with which automobile ignites more often than the other and the pollution each creates. Regardless, the construction and use of both types of automobiles leaves a trail of pollution, environmental damage and so on for the life of the vehicle. The main difference is that the ICE automobile emits harmful gasses, plus hydrocarbons whenever the engine idles, and this continues through the life of the vehicle, while the EV does not. Any harmful fumes emitted from the EV can only happen if there is a battery electrical malfunction, which is rare. I completely understand your points; as such I cannot argue with anybody about the pros and cons of either vehicle.
The truth is as follows: the only way for humankind to not harm the environment and our own health is by not existing. But there are people in isolated places, villages, and so on, who subsist from the sea and land, people who aren't industrialized, don't have automobiles, nor electrical power.
You guys wouldn't know what a long drive is. Do 1000km, 10.5 hours straight in a day and come back to me lol.
That is like driving from Virginia to Florida in the US (I actually think that trip is longer distance than yours). Which I've done before in my EV. IIRC it was like a 11-12 hour trip.You guys wouldn't know what a long drive is. Do 1000km, 10.5 hours straight in a day and come back to me lol.
The carbon footprint of building an EV is only really an issue for the first 2 years. After that it’s miles better than a gas guzzler. Especially if your electricity is powered by renewables.I don’t think anybody is suggesting producing cars and just about any product does not have some carbon footprint. Anything that uses metal, plastic or rubber will contain a background to some degree where it’s not environmentally friendly. It’s possible to improve as much as we can though and EV’s may not be green to produce, but they don’t emit emissions once in use and that has to be a good thing. Not suggesting everybody gets an EV as that is unrealistic at this point in time. Plus I don’t want everybody to get EV’s because I’m enjoying the benefits of easy parking and charging far too much. But, those that do are at least reducing emissions a little bit at a time.
Did I say I like it, it’s called a job lol wouldn’t do it for fun.I have absolutely no desire to drive 1000km in a day to be brutally honest. It would be impossible to do that where I live anyway as traffic and congestion simply wouldn’t allow you to achieve it.
We get it though. You like driving for 10.5 hours a day in a noisy car and you’re welcome to it.
Making your car did lolYour daily commute really sucks….
No I couldn’t drive 10 hours straight in a day. I need to stop to pee and drink and eat.
So charging the car whilst I do that (say 3-4 long journeys a year) is no issue.
Driving for that long without a break is dangerous.
Meanwhile 99% of my journeys don’t require charging stops. 100% of my journeys don’t pump out harmful gases into the environment.
Like every EV driver I’ve ever spoken to, I’m never buying another ICE car. So last century technology.
Did I say I like it, it’s called a job lol wouldn’t do it for fun.
Not to mention the pollution from the oil drilling, transportation, refining and delivery to the car.The point I am trying to make has nothing to do with which automobile ignites more often than the other and the pollution each creates. Regardless, the construction and use of both types of automobiles leaves a trail of pollution, environmental damage and so on for the life of the vehicle. The main difference is that the ICE automobile emits harmful gasses, plus hydrocarbons whenever the engine idles, and this continues through the life of the vehicle, while the EV does not. […]
People underestimate this, most refineries have a power station nearby because they consume so much energy.Not to mention the pollution from the oil drilling, transportation, refining and delivery to the car.
No I just travel the state for my business sometimes.You didn’t provide any context at all, just a vague challenge for the rest of us to drive 10.5 hours a day because the rest of us ‘don’t know what a long drive is’. What are you, a long distance lorry driver or something?
Indeed. As does making any car. Many of the materials are very similar. But once an EV is made it is a lot more efficient than any ICE vehicle. Even more so if you drive a lightweight EV like mine made from carbon fibre and aluminium etc.Making your car did lol
95% of my charging is done whilst I'm working and its sat in the office car park. So whilst you are having to go to the gas station (after all time is money) then filling up (gas is money!), I'd just sat at work earning money and not wasting my time.Till your better needs replacing then will be spending big bucks, and what happens to your battery land fill.
My car is a tax right off earns me my living, cost doesn’t matter, time is money, sitting around waiting or looking for a charging station while on the road would be a nightmare lol