Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Who's got a nice watch? Traditional watches only, no smartwatches please.
- Thread starter JW8725
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
By "carry" I mean "wear." Most of my watches get carried at some point or another. The only running one that doesn't is the 18K gold Waltham that I posted earlier, because it's just too nice to risk putting wear on the case.
As for this one, Peoria arose from the ashes of the Fredonia Watch Company in 1886, and I think were gone by 1890, so that gives some idea of the age. I don't exactly when in there it was made.
And, yes it does run. It didn't when I first got it, but after I scraped the crystalized whale oil out of the jewels and put in fresh synthetic oil it ran great. It keeps time to within about a minute a day, and could probably do better if I took the time to regulate it.
Not to dis on anyone who buys one, but am I the only one that thinks Rolex's are rather... plain and boring?
Thank you for your informative and interesting post.
And yes, I am delighted to learn that it runs, and that when you write 'carry' you mean 'wear', I like lovely old things .especially those which still work well, or have been restored so that they have come to work well again
Indeed, if I had come across, or inherited, such a lovely object d'art - which is still capable of doing (very well - a minute a day is little in a watch that is more than a century old - a few weeks ago, I saw a 600 year old clock in Wells Cathedral in south west England which still keeps excellent time .) what it is designed to do, which is keep time accurately, I would wear it, too.
Anyway, well wear; it is a beautiful piece, well worth keeping, and 'carrying' and wearing. Enjoy it.
Well, it is very possible, or probable that you are - this is a watch thread, after all.
For myself, I am not remotely passionate about some of the huge, massive, clunky, macho, over the top modern Rolexes; however, the older, classic, subdued, elegant ones, now, that is a rather different matter ..and I must say that I find some of the old Rolexes to be rather attractive .
This is the typical response from people who are new to watches.
People with high-end watches (higher than Rolex) appreciate Rolexes for being simple durable beater watches.
----------
http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/hodinkee-apple-watch-review
this review is absolutely wonderful.
I wouldn't say I'm "new to watches". I've owned several Bulovas and Citizens. I really like the most of Breitling's lines.
For some reason I just can't see the allure of Rolex's. And I freely admit that it might be because I've never owned one. Each to their own, I suppose.
I wouldn't say I'm "new to watches". I've owned several Bulovas and Citizens. I really like the most of Breitling's lines.
For some reason I just can't see the allure of Rolex's. And I freely admit that it might be because I've never owned one. Each to their own, I suppose.
I would say that is new to watches.
Three basic levels of Rolex appreciation.
1) When I was new to watches, I thought Rolex was THE BEST.
I did not know there were any better than Rolex.
2) Then I discovered that there were other watches, some much better and some better priced. At that time, I felt that Rolex was THE WORST.
3) After owning a lot of watches, some much cheaper and some higher end (Breguet, Patek, etc), I have come to realize that Rolex is really the best at what it does: making durable robust mechanical watches that will last you probably several generations.
This article sums it up perfectly.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jackfor...l-look-at-the-worlds-most-recognized-watch/2/
That argument is sort of like saying that because someone hasn't owned a Ferrari, they are "new to cars".
This (#3) is pretty much why I now love Rolex. I can have several for the price of one PP or ALS, and they are much more robust than watches from those makers.
I'd say that about PP. Much more simple and outdated looking exterior, yet extraordinarily more overpriced than Rolex. You can't go wrong with a Rolex. Even if I did have the money to buy a PP, I would rather throw it away than spend it on that brand.
I have a big appreciation for Rolex although I don't own one and likely never will because of the price. However I don't think you have to own a hugely expensive high end watch to be considered an enthusiast. My favourite watches in my price range are Seiko, Steinhart, and Edifice. I get enjoyment because they are well made, they look good and are good value for me. I still take an interest in the high end watches and enjoy the craftsmanship and history. The watch industry is huge.
I love the circular display and the brightness that it gives off. How is it treating you so far? I have been thinking of getting one and was waiting until they showed the Apple Watch, and the Moto 360 looks 10x better.
Usually wear a Seiko Orange Monster or a Casio G watch but bought the LG G Watch recently, loving it so far and will keep it until the next wave of android wear watches come out, I do love the look of the LG G Watch Round though.
I stopped reading after "If I did have the money to buy a PP.."
----------
I have a big appreciation for Rolex although I don't own one and likely never will because of the price. However I don't think you have to own a hugely expensive high end watch to be considered an enthusiast. My favourite watches in my price range are Seiko, Steinhart, and Edifice. I get enjoyment because they are well made, they look good and are good value for me. I still take an interest in the high end watches and enjoy the craftsmanship and history. The watch industry is huge.
Yes I agree with you.
But to have perspective, you have to know where Rolex stands in the context of the entire watch industry.
If your perspective is that either Rolex is the best or that it is the most overpriced **** ever, that would make you a newbie.
Likewise, you don't need to own a Ferrari to appreciate 911's but anyone claiming that it's either the best or the most overpriced garbage needs perspective.
I don't claim Rolex is the best or that it is overpriced. I am also not new to watch collecting. I think we gain perspective from our own experiences and this can only be judged by ourselves. I must admit I have never encountered your definition of 'newbie' in watch collecting before, its a new one for me I am afraid.
I don't claim Rolex is the best or that it is overpriced. I am also not new to watch collecting. I think we gain perspective from our own experiences and this can only be judged by ourselves. I must admit I have never encountered your definition of 'newbie' in watch collecting before, its a new one for me I am afraid.
I was just referring to the Forbes article link posted above, where the context is three phases of Rolex appreciation.
It does reflect for the most part most luxury watch collectors.
The touchscreen does ignore input at times and the software is a bit laggy too, but so far I'm really liking the fit and how lightweight it is. Very comfortable to wear. Charging is super quick and so far it does barely last you a full day with moderate use. The display is acceptably crisp and legible at all conditions, though not pixel-dense up close. Pretty much every Moto 360 out there has a dead pixel or two as well - including mine. Poor quality control and cheap hardware me thinks. Notifications are by far and away the best thing about this, so long as you're an Android user. It does looks great when the screen is on, but without the screen on it looks like a black dud of a puck on a leathery strap.
I'd be really happy if this was $200, which I feel is the right price for it. It's not overly premium feeling, and the build quality is mediocre compared to a proper piece of metal timepiece.
Yup, I do too, but they are involved in sponsorship and timing of various sports events and the like. I guess luxurious elegance is not of much concern to Rolex, or those that wear one. Functionality and association with action is more the image they foster.
However that is a mere peasant's observation. I have neither worn, nor owned a watch of any kind for several decades, and am unlikely to do so any time soon, not even the
WATCH.