Yep - this is my take on it too. I dont want either device to try and be like the other one. Nope. Just be the best you possibly can at what you were designed for. iPads are the best tablets because they are JUST tablets and have a tablet-centric OS that runs on them. Thats how it should be, IMO. Same for macbooks and laptops: Run your full blown OS like a regular computer ought to. Dont try to add touch features or other gimmicks.
I think it COULD be really good, but nobody has cracked the code yet.
It’s partially hardware and partially software.
On the hardware side, you’re going to need bigger, bulkier hardware to run desktop applications. You can make it iPad thin (like the Samsung hybrid) but you’re sacrificing power (which is the first thing people would scream about - how “underpowered” it is). Or make it thicker and heavier and you loose a big part of what people go for in a tablet.
The BIG issue is on the software side, specifically in changing the whole user experience between desktop/mobile. You really have to do a LOT of reconfiguring in the UI to make a desktop app into a true mobile app. Maybe that even means loosing features, but certainly making it touch-first.
Microsoft had some good momentum with Windows 8. Yes, it was a disaster in terms of a released product, but as a concept it was a really good first step.
If Apple came out with a hybrid (I say, knowing that it won’t happen anytime soon), I would like to see an iPad style device that lets you configure the UI dynamically - maybe using a slider bar - between iOS and MacOS. An “in between OS” won’t cut it - it needs to be adjustable for the user needs at the moment. The UI would have to be completely configurable.
What I like is the SurfaceBook concept from Microsoft. Take the tablet portion and plug it into the “Performance Base” and get more processing power, more graphics power, etc.
A real, TRUE hybrid isn’t going to look anything like what we have today - and may never happen. The industry seems to be going for more of a new OS for every platform. Microsoft WANTS to have one Windows to rule them all, but at the end of the day, it’s still different versions of Windows with different UIs. For Microsoft to be truely successful, they have to leave their current customer base behind and think about what they need to do to make it work - they’re just too tied to their current customer base who demands a Start Menu.