Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
More to the point, there hasn't been inflation of IT products until, maybe, fairly recently. $1500 has bought you a half-decent personal computer since the 1980s (for the time - Mac or IBM PC were even more expensive when they were the new shiny). The iMac went up a whole 10% between 1998 and 2020 (c.f. general inflation ~60%). Laptops and basic PCs have gone down in price.

That's ignoring the whole "...and they got several orders of magnitude more powerful" thing that makes talking about inflation almost meaningless - I'm just looking at "cheapest desktop system including display". To judge inflation, you have to as questions like "what's the cheapest new desktop/laptop Mac I can buy today" - since it's almost guaranteed that will have better specs than the cheapest option anything more than two years ago.

...the Mac Mini has gone up $100 between 2005 and 2020 (c.f. general inflation ~36%). The cheapest Mac laptop has gone down from $1299 (2006 white MacBook) to $999 (current M1 MacBook Air).

If you want to compare phones, there's no point comparing the iPhone 3G with the iPhone 14 Pro DoublePlus - the successor to the iPhone 3G is the SE. First price I can find on Everymac for an unlocked, off-contract iPhone was the iPhone 4 at $649 and (as far as I can tell) the SE now starts at $429.

I think what passes for "inflation" is that (a) in the case of Phones Apple have been throwing the love at new, higher priced iPhones that are more pocket video/photo studio/games consoles than smartphones, while the "basic smartphone" has just plodded along - and (b) generally people have come to expect IT prices to stay the same, if not drop in absolute terms while the specs increase exponentially - but the technology is starting to mature and so, sometimes, the spec bumps are coming at a cost.

Having said that, 2020-2022 saw the release of M1 Macs with - generally - significantly better performance at the same price point (unless you wanted a lower-end 27" iMac).
I agree with almost everything you said except the bit in bold. You absolutely should compared the iPhone 3G with the iPhone 14 Pro - the 3G was the only, and best, iPhone they sold back then - it's equivalent now is not the SE - it's the 14 Pro/Max.

You're absolutely right though - Laptops are quite good value for money compared to before. However let's also consider economies of scale compared to 1980/90s and now. There's also stiffer competition that's helped keep that price in check. And funnily enough, somehow, Apple is leading the charge with performance to cost ratio with the M series chips.
 
  • Like
Reactions: madeirabhoy
The price in dollar is non-relevant.

The price is local currency has increased a lot. Due to dollar being very strong recently. Therefore Apple has increased the price a lot in local currency. Which makes customers angry since no one likes paying more than they did last year.
the thing is, the price is dollar is exactly why this is relevant
 
2 weeks ago:

Poland:
Samsung Z Flip 4 128GB = 999$ == 5149 PLN
Iphone 14 Pro 128gb = 999$ =? 6499 PLN

Edit:
Or magic numbers here like:
MacBook Air M1 lowest model $999 == 5799 PLN
Or
Apple Watch Ultra = 799$ == 4799 PLN
And there is the best:
iPhone 14 lowest model = 799$ == 5199 PLN

So? Stop telling about $ ratio, it’s just greedy
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Saladin12
People here in Europe are discussing the price of everything going up because that’s what has happened. A 4 pint of milk was £1.10 in May but now it’s £1.55, so it’s gone up in price, not adjusted. Every product sold has increased by some degree and iPhones are just something else. The consequences of this are that reports suggest the iPhone 14 has suffered a drop in demand here so ultimately Apple have lost out like many other companies competing during this period of high inflation.

To be fair the demand for the iPhone 14 has been extremely low in the US too, and there was no price increase here. The lack of demand might be due to the perception that this is a rather lackluster update rather than the price increases.

But ya, everything has gone up in price here too. A 30-40% increase in the cost of milk/food items is also what I am seeing in my local stores. Although sometimes they just raise the price by 10% while decrease package size by 20%. End result is the same though. That is why the fact that the iPhones didn’t go up in price in the US is so surprising because surely everything else is going up. I do wonder if the stronger dollar has somehow helped Apple keep prices the same in the US.
 
There are a number of posts in this thread referring to consumer protection laws. Let's clear something - the warranty by law is against the merchant and not the manufacturer. Say the law gives 5 years protection and you purchased the iPhone from a retailer, not Apple Store. During those 5 years, you make warranty claims with the store, not Apple. In the first year, because Apple warranty is one year, you may claim against Apple as well - it is your choice.
 
I agree with almost everything you said except the bit in bold. You absolutely should compared the iPhone 3G with the iPhone 14 Pro - the 3G was the only, and best, iPhone they sold back then - it's equivalent now is not the SE - it's the 14 Pro/Max.
Well, that's the whole problem with applying inflation to technology - it's rather subjective what you compare with what. With something like bread - if someone compared a basic sliced white sandwich loaf in 2010 with an artisan ancient-grain sourdough in 2020 you'd probably call them out on not comparing like-with-like. Of course, once upon a time, sliced white bread was the expensive new novelty & the best thing since sliced... er... indoor bathrooms. The "standard basket of goods" for inflation is constantly being refined to reflect those changes (which is why working out the cost of a Mac Plus in 'modern money' is a bit pointless - people didn't buy Mac Plus' so that they could chat to Aunt Mary on Zoom).

If the SE had been ditched, or maybe left unchanged, then a 14 would be the only option. However - the iPhone SE is still available, recently updated, and already significantly more powerful than - lets say the iPhone 4 (leaving the 3 and 3G as the novelty for early adopters) - and more than adequate for the original purposes of personal communication, personal organiser, navigation, music player, snapshots etc. which are still what some of us want from a phone. As I see it, the top-end phones are really a different class of product, being pitched as (YMMV) suitable for serious photography and video work and offering processing power comparable to laptop computers - something not really conceivable in the iPhone 4 days.

...the big iPhone "price hike" would have come if Apple had dropped the SE or left it without updates. Offering a more expensive option - while still keeping the entry-level updated - isn't necessarily a price hike.

However let's also consider economies of scale compared to 1980/90s and now. There's also stiffer competition that's helped keep that price in check.
Economies of scale - yes - but competition was ferocious in the 1980s, especially before Microsoft and Intel landed on top & the market became dominated by clone-makers bolting together the same components.
 
There are a number of posts in this thread referring to consumer protection laws. Let's clear something - the warranty by law is against the merchant and not the manufacturer.
Quite true.
But - in terms of any affect on pricing - that only changes who you, as a consumer, have to call/sue when it breaks.

The cost has to come from somewhere: either the manufacturer offers compatible warranty services as part of their contract with the merchant or the margin between the wholesale price and the retail price has to cover the [edit] manufacturer merchant's costs. The end result in either case: unless the manufacturer eats the costs, the consumer pays more.

OTOH, I'd rather pay a bit more up front (which will be kept in check by competition) than have to buy an expensive extended warranty as a "hidden extra".
 
  • Like
Reactions: vddobrev
More to the point, there hasn't been inflation of IT products until, maybe, fairly recently. $1500 has bought you a half-decent personal computer since the 1980s (for the time - Mac or IBM PC were even more expensive when they were the new shiny). The iMac went up a whole 10% between 1998 and 2020 (c.f. general inflation ~60%). Laptops and basic PCs have gone down in price.

That's ignoring the whole "...and they got several orders of magnitude more powerful" thing that makes talking about inflation almost meaningless - I'm just looking at "cheapest desktop system including display". To judge inflation, you have to as questions like "what's the cheapest new desktop/laptop Mac I can buy today" - since it's almost guaranteed that will have better specs than the cheapest option anything more than two years ago.

...the Mac Mini has gone up $100 between 2005 and 2020 (c.f. general inflation ~36%). The cheapest Mac laptop has gone down from $1299 (2006 white MacBook) to $999 (current M1 MacBook Air).

If you want to compare phones, there's no point comparing the iPhone 3G with the iPhone 14 Pro DoublePlus - the successor to the iPhone 3G is the SE. First price I can find on Everymac for an unlocked, off-contract iPhone was the iPhone 4 at $649 and (as far as I can tell) the SE now starts at $429.

I think what passes for "inflation" is that (a) in the case of Phones Apple have been throwing the love at new, higher priced iPhones that are more pocket video/photo studio/games consoles than smartphones, while the "basic smartphone" has just plodded along - and (b) generally people have come to expect IT prices to stay the same, if not drop in absolute terms while the specs increase exponentially - but the technology is starting to mature and so, sometimes, the spec bumps are coming at a cost.

Having said that, 2020-2022 saw the release of M1 Macs with - generally - significantly better performance at the same price point (unless you wanted a lower-end 27" iMac).
Reminds me of a PC Magazine article read by I think John C Dvorak. He basically said the computer you WANT is always "$3000" a statement which has held from the time I bought my first "PC" back in 1991, through today.
 
OTOH, I'd rather pay a bit more up front (which will be kept in check by competition) than have to buy an expensive extended warranty as a "hidden extra".
I'd rather pay a little less up front, then skip the entirely unnecessary extended warranty. As a consumer, I prefer choice.
 
Canada here, we're shedding tears into our hearty non-watered down beer and maple syrup with you Europe. The price hikes are painful.

Just for the record, the beer scene down here is a whole lot better than it was thirty years ago. Lots of 6, 7, 8, and 9% ABV options readily available; and these are just some of the ones brewed within an hour or so of me.

Cheers! 🍻
 
There are a number of posts in this thread referring to consumer protection laws. Let's clear something - the warranty by law is against the merchant and not the manufacturer. Say the law gives 5 years protection and you purchased the iPhone from a retailer, not Apple Store. During those 5 years, you make warranty claims with the store, not Apple. In the first year, because Apple warranty is one year, you may claim against Apple as well - it is your choice.

Not in the UK. Whenever I’ve had issues with Apple products I have been referred to Apple who have taken in the replacement process even if I bought the iPhone through a carrier.
 
Not in the UK. Whenever I’ve had issues with Apple products I have been referred to Apple who have taken in the replacement process even if I bought the iPhone through a carrier.
It’s not just Apple, part of the reason I switched was because I was sick of paying almost a month of line rental to be without a phone because I had to mail it in. One of my friends told me that I could walk into Apple and get it looked at (today I had an appointment with a genius who fixed my issue and made sure my other phone didn’t have it. All credit to Cardiff Apple Store)
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
It’s not just Apple, part of the reason I switched was because I was sick of paying almost a month of line rental to be without a phone because I had to mail it in. One of my friends told me that I could walk into Apple and get it looked at (today I had an appointment with a genius who fixed my issue and made sure my other phone didn’t have it. All credit to Cardiff Apple Store)

Always had first class service at Cardiff’s Apple store including replacing a more than 2 year old iPhone for free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VampyricGentleman
Always had first class service at Cardiff’s Apple store including replacing a more than 2 year old iPhone for free.
Yep same here, they replaced a iPad Mini for me that had screen bleed even though it was out of warranty, because “it happened in warranty as far as we are concerned, you just couldn’t get to us because of the pandemic”
 
2 weeks ago:

Poland:
Samsung Z Flip 4 128GB = 999$ == 5149 PLN
Iphone 14 Pro 128gb = 999$ =? 6499 PLN

Edit:
Or magic numbers here like:
MacBook Air M1 lowest model $999 == 5799 PLN
Or
Apple Watch Ultra = 799$ == 4799 PLN
And there is the best:
iPhone 14 lowest model = 799$ == 5199 PLN

So? Stop telling about $ ratio, it’s just greedy
BTW: $999 exchanges to 4,954.52 PLN
S799 exchanges to 3,961.39 PLN

Well, Apple has always been using really funny exchange rates in less interesting countries. We had a reason to go to the US and buy Apple products there, the price difference was so huge it literally paid up for the plane ticket and then some more.
However when it comes to difference between AWU $799 and iP14 $799 it is about product segmentation. Apple will sell a few of these watches in Poland, so their distributor (AB S.A., IIRC?) can take the hit, no harm will be done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: addamas
Yeah. Have you ever had the misfortune of trying Samsung after sales support? I wouldn’t wish it on my enemy.
Nope I heard bad things and stayed away, I was a Sony user until I made the switch. Whilst their team were good, everything had to be posted in, inspected, letter sent (not emailed, posted) with any costs plus their service charge, which had to be then replied to before they would fix the machine. Again this had to be posted
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fred Zed
Also, if you're talking about phones, ask your European colleagues how much they're paying for their call/data plans. Last I looked, USA folk were paying through the nose...
It's because
- Europe as a continent full of countries and densely populated is completely different from the US,which makes the telco market completely different.
- the EU has a great history of precise yet fair market regulation for telco.

(In the UK I'm paying £17/month for unlimited calls & data, after very minimal haggling)
Ouch, not EU. But I believe you've kept the legislation. Also, EU: £7.11 for two SIM cards, unlimited calls, 60GB data, major operator originating from France.
 
It's because
- Europe as a continent full of countries and densely populated is completely different from the US,which makes the telco market completely different.
- the EU has a great history of precise yet fair market regulation for telco.


Ouch, not EU. But I believe you've kept the legislation. Also, EU: £7.11 for two SIM cards, unlimited calls, 60GB data, major operator originating from France.
Yea US gets the shaft on a few things cause of uneven population.

Cell plans like you mentioned.
Internet
Mass Transit, especially trains. Wish we had trains equal speed or better than planes instead of half your vacation in travel time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hwojtek
Yea US gets the shaft on a few things cause of uneven population.

Cell plans like you mentioned.
Internet
Mass Transit, especially trains. Wish we had trains equal speed or better than planes instead of half your vacation in travel time.
It will be a while before most places get a train the same speed as a plane, an average airliner goes between 460 and 575 mph where as an average train goes at top speed around 124mph but few do because of the number of stops they need to make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.