Yes, the choice varies quite a bit depending where you are.
Price difference between 128GB vs. 128GB Pro:
- U.S. = 14%
- Canada = 17%
- Germany = 21%
- China = 25%
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Other Why would anyone get the iPhone 12 over the iPhone 12 Pro?
- Thread starter Rogifan
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yes, the choice varies quite a bit depending where you are.
Price difference between 128GB vs. 128GB Pro:
Funny you should say that... I find an ultra-wide lens basically useless in real-world applications but could not do without a telephoto lens anymore after using it extensively on my iPhone X for the past almost three years.
What do you use that ultra-wide angle lens for? I'm genuinely curious as I have not once in the last three years wished for a shorter focal length.
Not that people are doing much of it right now but the wide angle is a legitimate game changer for travel photography.
I asked my wife if she gave a damn about the extra lens and she said she just wanted extra memory.. she’s on a XS Max so I saved some money and got a 12 256GB
I suppose. Just seems like their iPhone lineup is messy and could be cleaner.
Coming back to OP's comparison, I think it's better to use the base prices of the two phones; those are the minimum introductory costs outside of our control.
Using the 128gb 12 in the comparison tricks your mind a bit with thinking the difference isn't that much. But it's a sizable jump if you were only considering the 64gb initially.
Go Pro, or Go Home 
There I’m the first to say it. Truly just buy what you need for the term you think you have the phone.
There I’m the first to say it. Truly just buy what you need for the term you think you have the phone.
Seems to me Apple’s product designs these days revolve around 2 things: hitting price points and upselling. Lineup is messy because they’re trying to hit all these price points and then with the 12 in some ways the features/price is designed to upsell you to the Pro. I wish Apple would make people’s choice simple: what screen size do you want. Instead they over complicate things.
That difference can buy you a new HomePod Mini and the charger you’re going to need.
In all seriousness, some people may be going for the savings and/or the colors. The RAM and camera differences aren’t that important to them.
In all seriousness, some people may be going for the savings and/or the colors. The RAM and camera differences aren’t that important to them.
I suspect most iPhone 12 purchases will be 128GB, from a practical and marketing perspective. For people who don't know anything about storage size, they're more likely to choose the middle storage option as a safe bet.
Same here. I'm getting the Max for the camera and screen size, but if I wasn't looking for those two features then I'd get the 12 for the color options alone. I've always wanted a Product RED phone.
Judging by the last few releases... the 128GB model is not only more storage but also faster storage. Probably not enough to where people notice but for things like installs, video processing, file transfer... etc.
There’s the weight issue. Can’t wait to get rid of a stainless steel chassis and move back to aluminum.
Thanks, @Cookie18 and @zipster for the clarifications. I did briefly consider both both travel photography as well the amount of information you can capture indoors with an ultra-wide angle but still couldn't fathom why I could possibly personally prefer an ultra-wide angle over a telephoto lens. Back in 2016 when my wife and I quit our jobs to travel the world I was able to capture stunning landscape sceneries using my iPhone 6+'s main lens in software panorama mode so I guess I never really missed that feature in the first place. It probably boils down to personal preference and the way you use your smartphone camera. I value close-ups rich in detail with naturally blurred backgrounds much more than admittedly impressive landscape photos where you have to point out that those seven white pixels next to the four green ones are actually grandma
I use mine mainly for two things: to bring somewhat distant objects closer without losing any detail and macro-lens photography of small or tiny objects. Case in point: the following photo was shot using my iPhone X's 2x telephoto lens without applying any digital zoom:
At 128 or 256 GB, the price difference is minimal, especially if SIM-free, but so is the feature difference. Most users are not going to see any real world difference except the extra telephoto lens, and maybe the extra RAM if you keep it a few years and 4 GB begins to feel cramped. If you are heavily into photography then that's different, and the Pro becomes a clearer choice. The Pro is also 15% heavier (25g), which is a negative in my book.
I can see lots of people going for the $799 version of the iPhone 12.
I can see lots of people going for the $799 version of the iPhone 12.
Thanks, @Cookie18 and @zipster for the clarifications. I did briefly consider both both travel photography as well the amount of information you can capture indoors with an ultra-wide angle but still couldn't fathom why I could possibly personally prefer an ultra-wide angle over a telephoto lens. Back in 2016 when my wife and I quit our jobs to travel the world I was able to capture stunning landscape sceneries using my iPhone 6+'s main lens in software panorama mode so I guess I never really missed that feature in the first place. It probably boils down to personal preference and the way you use your smartphone camera. I value close-ups rich in detail with naturally blurred backgrounds much more than admittedly impressive landscape photos where you have to point out that those seven white pixels next to the four green ones are actually grandma
I use mine mainly for two things: to bring somewhat distant objects closer without losing any detail and macro-lens photography of small or tiny objects. Case in point: the following photo was shot using my iPhone X's 2x telephoto lens without applying any digital zoom:
View attachment 967034
I thought the exact same as you before trying out the wide angle. I’ve taken some truly amazing shots with the wide angle on my iPhone 11. I appreciate the telephoto on my XS but not as much as I really thought. I did consider getting an 11 Pro instead of a 12 for the extra camera but I decided I’d prefer the better quality main and wide angle along with some of the other features.
Here are a few photos I’ve taken on my iPhone 11 with wide angle to illustrate what I mean. I suppose at the end of the day though, it really comes down to the type of photos you want to take.
Attachments
I'm getting a Pro Max for me because I like the larger screen. My wife will get the normal 12, as the 12 Pro doesn't sell itself enough to justify the $120 price increase. My military discount essentially knocks $100 off any of them, so I could get the 12 Pro for the same price as most people pay for the 12, but I still don't see any value in Dolby 60fps vs. Dolby 30fps, or a telephoto lens that will probably never get used to its full potential.
6GB RAM vs. 4GB RAM could be a debate, but by the time that actually makes any difference on iOS we'd likely be ready to upgrade phones again anyway.
6GB RAM vs. 4GB RAM could be a debate, but by the time that actually makes any difference on iOS we'd likely be ready to upgrade phones again anyway.
Damn you, op!
I was committed to getting a 128gb 12 but now you made me look at the numbers again.
Over 30 months, which is what I’d be committing to anyway due to the AT&T credit, the difference is only $5/month.
I couldn’t care less about the camera but if I have it I’ll obviously use it.
The brighter screen will be nice.
The LIDAR could be cool.
The stainless steel would be reassuring given bendgate.
All for the price of a venti Starbucks.
I just wish the blues were the same shade. Oh well.... there’s always graphite.
I was committed to getting a 128gb 12 but now you made me look at the numbers again.
Over 30 months, which is what I’d be committing to anyway due to the AT&T credit, the difference is only $5/month.
I couldn’t care less about the camera but if I have it I’ll obviously use it.
The brighter screen will be nice.
The LIDAR could be cool.
The stainless steel would be reassuring given bendgate.
All for the price of a venti Starbucks.
I just wish the blues were the same shade. Oh well.... there’s always graphite.
Average consumers won't notice or care about the brighter screen. Better cameras may be a selling point but they're close enough that it won't justify the purchase for most average consumers. Default storage being higher is mixed, but probably not worth the jump.
MacRumors users may be more "power users" so people on here may be more likely to spring for the Pro, but for most consumers they see how similar they look and will go for the cheaper one. Of course, the 5.4" size is another draw for the regular 12, there are a number of people (me included) who like the small sized phone.
MacRumors users may be more "power users" so people on here may be more likely to spring for the Pro, but for most consumers they see how similar they look and will go for the cheaper one. Of course, the 5.4" size is another draw for the regular 12, there are a number of people (me included) who like the small sized phone.
The 12 pro is not worth it and people who are buying it, are just getting it for the name (not everyone I know but trying to get a point across).
The 12 is a better value, the 12 pro has last year's cameras and a lidar sensor that isn't too useful. I would just get the 12, only the max is the pro with value (new hardware). All devices are OLED, very good choice on apple's part.
The 12 is a better value, the 12 pro has last year's cameras and a lidar sensor that isn't too useful. I would just get the 12, only the max is the pro with value (new hardware). All devices are OLED, very good choice on apple's part.